대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

창의성 멘토링 프로그램에 의한 건축설계교수법 혁신방안 연구

Innovation Method Research for Architectural Design Education with the Creativity Mentoring Program

  • 투고 : 2015.10.01
  • 심사 : 2015.12.20
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the creativity mentoring program adopted for the architectural design studio. This method was based on the instructional scaffolding theory of Vygotsky's concept and several creativity programs such as SCAMPER, storytelling, pictogram, activity diagram, attribute listing, bug listing method are applied for the experiment group. The 37 first and second grade students were tested in two groups. TTCT(Torrance Test for Creative Thinking) and the expert evaluation were applied as a creativity measuring tool for the students. There were statistically significant improvements between the experimental group and the control group. There were 14.72% of improvement for the first-grade students and 5.80% for second-grade students for TTCT. The mentoring program adopted for architectural design studios was effective increasing the creativity among experimental group in every sub-factors of TTCT in comparison with controled group.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국연구재단

참고문헌

  1. Cha, Y. (2010). The Effects of a Problem-Finding Based Instruction on Creativity of the Engineering College Students, Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 20(01), 99-111.
  2. Choi, D. (2012). A Study on the Alternative Architectural Design Studio for the Creative Formative Education, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 28(12), 201-208.
  3. Choi, J. (2009). A Study on the Role of Diagrams as the Presentation Means of Design, Journal of Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 11(02), 21-29.
  4. Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: An Important teacher competency in online learning. TechTrends, 47(2), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763424
  5. Ellen Yi-Luen Do & Mark D. Gross (2001). Thinking with diagrams in architectural design, Artificial Intelligence Review, 15, 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006661524497
  6. Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life, In Rogoff, B & Lave. J .(Eds) Everyday Cognition :its devevopment in the social context, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
  7. Ham, Y. (2000). A study of strategy on Classroom Management Discourse. Master's Degree Thesis, In-Cheon University.
  8. Han, S. (1997). Parental Scaffolding in Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Elementary Education, 11(1), 115-134.
  9. Han, J., & Oh, J. (2003). Theoretical Review on Implementing Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) in the Virtual Reality Leaning Environments. Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 95-123.
  10. Jang, E. (1999). Conversation Strategy between a Teacher and a Students, Master's Degree Theses, Han-Yang University.
  11. Jo, S. (2007). Towards a Design Pedagogy through a Housing Design Studio in Berkeley, Columbia, and Georgia Tech, Journal of Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 09(04), 19-30.
  12. Kim, K. (2006). Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT), Creativity Research Journal, 18(01).
  13. Kim, Y. (2004). Case Studies on the Teaching Methods of Architectural Design Education in USA, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 20(10), 103-110.
  14. Kim, Y. (2005). Case Studies on the Teaching Methods of Architectural Design Education in UK, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 21(5), 135-142.
  15. Ku, B. (2011). A Study on the Architectural Design Education focused on Desk Crits and Open Crits, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 27(1), 29-38.
  16. Lee, S. (2006). A Study on the Extension of Creativity by Scaffolding Composed of Presented Words, Journal of Open Education, 14(1), 185-213.
  17. Passing, D. (2001). Future online teacher's scaffolding: What kind of advance technology innovations would teachers like to see future distance training projects. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4), 599-606.
  18. Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (2005). Instructional design(3rd Ed). Denvers: Wiley.
  19. Sung, E. (2004). Influences of creativity and academic achievements on the ability of architectural design, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 20(09), 41-48.
  20. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G, (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
  21. Yoon, H. (2010). A Study on the Architectural Form Generation by Application of Program and Diagram, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 26(02), 69-77.
  22. Yeom, S. (2012). Teaching Method of Using Form as a Stimulus to Enhance Architectural Creativity, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 28(11), 177-184.
  23. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329