Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Plastic design of seismic resistant reinforced concrete frame

  • Received : 2014.06.17
  • Accepted : 2014.10.27
  • Published : 2015.01.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A new method for designing moment resisting concrete frames failing in a global mode is presented in this paper. Starting from the analysis of the typical collapse mechanisms of frames subjected to horizontal forces, the method is based on the application of the kinematic theorem of plastic collapse. The beam section properties are assumed to be known quantities, because they are designed to resist vertical loads. As a consequence, the unknowns of the design problem are the column sections. They are determined by means of design conditions expressing that the kinematically admissible multiplier of the horizontal forces corresponding to the global mechanism has to be the smallest among all kinematically admissible multipliers. In addition, the proposed design method includes the influence of second-order effects. In particular, second-order effects can play an important role in the seismic design and can be accounted for by means of the mechanism equilibrium curves of the analysed collapse mechanism. The practical application of the proposed methodology is herein presented with reference to the design of a multi-storey frame whose pattern of yielding is validated by means of push-over analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Akiyama, H. (1985), "Earthquake resistant limit state design for building" University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
  2. Bertero, V.V. and Popov, E.P. (1977), "Seismic behaviour of ductile moment-resisting reinforced concrete frames", in Reinforced Concrete Structures in Seismic Zones, ACI Publication SP-53, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp. 247-291.
  3. Bruneau, M., Uang, C.M. and Sabelli, R.S.E. (2011), "Ductile design of steel structures", McGraw-Hill.
  4. CSI 2007. SAP 2000: Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, Analysis Reference. Computer and Structure Inc, University of California, Berkeley.
  5. EN 1998-1 (2004), "Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings", CEN.
  6. Giugliano, M.T., Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2010), "Failure mode control of MRF-CB-Frames with reduced section solution for bracin members", J. Costruct. Steel Res.
  7. Kappos, A.J. (1986), "Evaluation of the inelastic seismic behaviour of multistorey reinforced concrete buildings", PhD Thesis (in Greek), Scientific Annual of the Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
  8. Lee H.S. (1996), "Revised rule for concept of strong-column weak-girder design", J. struct. Eng. ASCE, 122, 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:4(359)
  9. Longo A., Montuori R. and Piluso V. (2012a), "Theory of plastic mechanism control of dissipative truss moment frames", Eng. Strucut., 37, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.046
  10. Longo A., Montuori R. and Piluso V. (2012b), "Failure mode control and seismic response of dissipative truss moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 138, 1388-1397, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000569
  11. Mastrandrea L., Montuori R. and Piluso V. (2003), "Failure mode control of seismic resistant EB-frames", Stessa, 4th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas.
  12. Mazzolani F.M. and Piluso V. (1997), "Plastic design of seismic resistant steel frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26, pp. 167-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199702)26:2<167::AID-EQE630>3.0.CO;2-2
  13. Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2000), "Plastic design of steel frames with Dog-Bone Beam-to-Column joints", Third International Conference on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, STESSA 2000, Montreal, Canada, 21-24 August.
  14. Montuori, R., Nastri, E. and Piluso, V. (2014a), "Theory of plastic mechanism control for eccentrically braced frames with inverted Y-scheme", J.Construct. Steel Res., 93, 122-135.
  15. Montuori, R., Piluso, V. and Troisi, M. (2014b), "Innovative structural details in MR-frames for free from damage structures", Mech. Res. Commun., 58, 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.04.002
  16. Montuori R., Nastri E. and Piluso, V. (2014c), "Theory of plastic mechanism control for the seismic design of braced frames equipped with friction dampers", Mech. Res. Commun., 58, 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.10.020
  17. New Zealand Standard Code of Practice for the Design of Concrete Structures, NZS 3101: Part 1; Commentary NZS 3101: Part 2; Standard Association of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 1982.
  18. Panelis, G.G., Kappos, A.J. (1997), "Earthquake-resistant concrete structures", E&FN Spon, an imprint of Chapman & Hall.
  19. Park, R. (1986), "Ductile design approach for reinforced concrete frames", Earthq. Spectra, EERI, 2(3), pp. 565-619. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585398
  20. Paulay, T. (1977), "Seismic design of ductile moment resisting reinforced concrete frames, columns: evaluation of actions", Bull. New Zealand Natl. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 10, 85-94.
  21. Paulay, T. (1980), "Deterministic design procedure for ductile frames in seismic areas", ACI Publication SP-63, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp. 357-381.
  22. SEAOC. (1995), Vision 2000-A Framework for Performance Based Design, I, II, III. Structural Engineers Association of California, Vision 2000 Committee. Sacramento, California.

Cited by

  1. Influence of the strength reduction factor on the seismic reliability of structures with FPS considering intermediate PGA/PGV ratios vol.115, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.072
  2. Theory of Plastic Mechanism Control for MRF–EBF dual systems: Closed form solution vol.118, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.050
  3. Smart and simple design of seismic resistant reinforced concrete frame vol.115, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.050
  4. A general design procedure for failure mechanism control of reinforced concrete frames vol.118, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.043
  5. The Use of TPMC for Designing MRFs Equipped with FREEDAM Connections: A Case Study vol.763, pp.1662-9795, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.1041
  6. Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted R.C. precast industrial building vol.12, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.013
  7. The use of steel rbs to increase ductility of wooden beams vol.169, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.024
  8. Design of circular steel flange plates subjected to tension loads - yield line approach vol.187, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106995
  9. Experimental and theoretical analyses of the progressive collapse resistance of NSM strengthening RC frames after the failure of a corner column vol.47, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103805