DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects on G2/M Phase Cell Cycle Distribution and Aneuploidy Formation of Exposure to a 60 Hz Electromagnetic Field in Combination with Ionizing Radiation or Hydrogen Peroxide in L132 Nontumorigenic Human Lung Epithelial Cells

  • Jin, Hee (Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Yoon, Hye Eun (Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Seon (Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Kyung (Advanced Radiation Technology Institute, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Myung, Sung Ho (Power Systems Research Division, Electrical Environment Team, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Yun-Sil (Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2014.10.28
  • Accepted : 2015.01.29
  • Published : 2015.03.30

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess whether exposure to the combination of an extremely low frequency magnetic field (ELF-MF; 60 Hz, 1 mT or 2 mT) with a stress factor, such as ionizing radiation (IR) or $H_2O_2$, results in genomic instability in non-tumorigenic human lung epithelial L132 cells. To this end, the percentages of G2/M-arrested cells and aneuploid cells were examined. Exposure to 0.5 Gy IR or 0.05 mM $H_2O_2$ for 9 h resulted in the highest levels of aneuploidy; however, no cells were observed in the subG1 phase, which indicated the absence of apoptotic cell death. Exposure to an ELF-MF alone (1 mT or 2 mT) did not affect the percentages of G2/M-arrested cells, aneuploid cells, or the populations of cells in the subG1 phase. Moreover, when cells were exposed to a 1 mT or 2 mT ELF-MF in combination with IR (0.5 Gy) or $H_2O_2$ (0.05 mM), the ELF-MF did not further increase the percentages of G2/M-arrested cells or aneuploid cells. These results suggest that ELF-MFs alone do not induce either G2/M arrest or aneuploidy, even when administered in combination with different stressors.

Keywords

References

  1. Wertheimer N, Leeper E. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109:273-284. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112681
  2. Fernie KJ, Reynolds SJ. The effects of electromagnetic fields from power lines on avian reproductive biology and physiology: a review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2005;8:127-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400590909022
  3. Winker R, Ivancsits S, Pilger A, Adlkofer F, Rudiger HW. Chromosomal damage in human diploid fibroblasts by intermittent exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Mutat Res. 2005;585:43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.04.013
  4. Ivancsits S, Pilger A, Diem E, Jahn O, Rudiger HW. Cell type-specific genotoxic effects of intermittent extremely lowfrequency electromagnetic fields. Mutat Res. 2005;583:184-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.03.011
  5. Miller AB, To T, Agnew DA, Wall C, Green LM. Leukemia following occupational exposure to 60-Hz electric and magnetic fields among Ontario electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:150-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008902
  6. Juutilainen J, Lang S, Rytomaa T. Possible cocarcinogenic effects of ELF electromagnetic fields may require repeated long-term interaction with known carcinogenic factors. Bioelectromagnetics. 2000;21:122-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(200002)21:2<122::AID-BEM7>3.0.CO;2-D
  7. McCann J, Dietrich F, Rafferty C. The genotoxic potential of electric and magnetic fields: an update. Mutat Res. 1998;411: 45-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5742(98)00006-4
  8. Harris PA, Lamb J, Heaton B, Wheatley DN. Possible attenuation of the G2 DNA damage cell cycle checkpoint in HeLa cells by extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. Cancer Cell Int. 2002;2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-2-3
  9. Lange S, Richard D, Viergutz T, Kriehuber R, Weiss DG, Simko M. Alterations in the cell cycle and in the protein level of cyclin D1, p21CIP1, and p16INK4a after exposure to 50 Hz MF in human cells. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2002;41:131-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-002-0145-8
  10. Lange S, Viergutz T, Simko M. Modifications in cell cycle kinetics and in expression of G1 phase-regulating proteins in human amniotic cells after exposure to electromagnetic fields and ionizing radiation. Cell Prolif. 2004;37:337-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.2004.00317.x
  11. Verheyen GR, Pauwels G, Verschaeve L, Schoeters G. Effect of coexposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields and an aneugen on human lymphocytes, determined by the cytokinesis block micronucleus assay. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24:160-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10100
  12. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys. 1998;74:494-522.
  13. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 2010;99:818-836.
  14. Grassi C, D'Ascenzo M, Torsello A, Martinotti G, Wolf F, Cittadini A, Azzena GB. Effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on voltage-gated $Ca^{2+}$ channels and their role in modulation of neuroendocrine cell proliferation and death. Cell Calcium. 2004;35:307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2003.09.001
  15. Eleuteri AM, Amici M, Bonfili L, Cecarini V, Cuccioloni M, Grimaldi S, Giuliani L, Angeletti M, Fioretti E. 50 Hz extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance protein carbonyl groups content in cancer cells: effects on proteasomal systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:834239.
  16. Tofani S, Barone D, Cintorino M, de Santi MM, Ferrara A, Orlassino R, Ossola P, Peroglio F, Rolfo K, Ronchetto F. Static and ELF magnetic fields induce tumor growth inhibition and apoptosis. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001;22:419-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.69
  17. Pirozzoli MC, Marino C, Lovisolo GA, Laconi C, Mosiello L, Negroni A. Effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic field exposure on apoptosis and differentiation in a neuroblastoma cell line. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24:510-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10130
  18. Yoshizawa H, Tsuchiya T, Mizoe H, Ozeki H, Kanao S, Yomori H, Sakane C, Hasebe S, Motomura T, Yamakawa T, Mizuno F, Hirose H, Otaka Y. No effect of extremely low-frequency magnetic field observed on cell growth or initial response of cell proliferation in human cancer cell lines. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23:355-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10006
  19. Santini MT, Rainaldi G, Indovina PL. Cellular effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85:294-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000902781097
  20. World Health Organization. Environmental Health Criteria 238: Extremely low frequency fields. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
  21. Lee HJ, Jin YB, Lee JS, Choi JI, Lee JW, Myung SH, Lee YS. Combined effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic field exposure with various stress factors on cellular transformation in NIH3T3 cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012;33:207-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20700
  22. Jin YB, Kang GY, Lee JS, Choi JI, Lee JW, Hong SC, Myung SH, Lee YS. Effects on micronuclei formation of 60-Hz electromagnetic field exposure with ionizing radiation, hydrogen peroxide, or c-Myc overexpression. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012;88: 374-380. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2012.652724
  23. Yoon HE, Lee JS, Myung SH, Lee YS. Increased γ-H2AX by exposure to a 60-Hz magnetic fields combined with ionizing radiation, but not hydrogen peroxide, in non-tumorigenic human cell lines. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90:291-298. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2014.887866
  24. Kaplan MI, Limoli CL, Morgan WF. Perpetuating radiationinduced chromosomal instability. Radiat Oncol Investig. 1997; 5:124-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1997)5:3<124::AID-ROI8>3.0.CO;2-#
  25. Sen S. Aneuploidy and cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2000;12:82-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001622-200001000-00014
  26. Williams BR, Amon A. Aneuploidy: cancer's fatal flaw? Cancer Res. 2009;69:5289-5291. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0944
  27. Grimm D. Genetics. Disease backs cancer origin theory. Science. 2004;306:389.
  28. Bialy H. Aneuploidy and cancer--the vintage wine revisited. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:22-23. https://doi.org/10.1038/83463
  29. Thompson SL, Compton DA. Chromosomes and cancer cells. Chromosome Res. 2011;19:433-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-010-9179-y
  30. Serrano-Garcia L, Montero-Montoya R. Micronuclei and chromatid buds are the result of related genotoxic events. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2001;38:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.1048
  31. Morgan WF, Hartmann A, Limoli CL, Nagar S, Ponnaiya B. Bystander effects in radiation-induced genomic instability. Mutat Res. 2002;504:91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(02)00083-0
  32. Heim RA, Lench NJ, Swift M. Heterozygous manifestations in four autosomal recessive human cancer-prone syndromes: ataxia telangiectasia, xeroderma pigmentosum, Fanconi anemia, and Bloom syndrome. Mutat Res. 1992;284:25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(92)90022-T
  33. Kadhim MA, Macdonald DA, Goodhead DT, Lorimore SA, Marsden SJ, Wright EG. Transmission of chromosomal instability after plutonium alpha-particle irradiation. Nature. 1992; 355:738-740. https://doi.org/10.1038/355738a0
  34. Morgan WF, Day JP, Kaplan MI, McGhee EM, Limoli CL. Genomic instability induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 1996;146:247-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579454
  35. Lagroye I, Poncy JL. The effect of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on the formation of micronuclei in rodent cell lines exposed to gamma radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;72:249-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530097143473
  36. Mevissen M, Haussler M, Lerchl A, Loscher W. Acceleration of mammary tumorigenesis by exposure of 7,12-dimethylbenz [a]anthracene-treated female rats in a 50-Hz, 100-microT magnetic field: replication study. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 1998;53:401-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/009841098159259
  37. Baum A, Mevissen M, Kamino K, Mohr U, Loscher W. A histopathological study on alterations in DMBA-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rats with 50 Hz, 100 muT magnetic field exposure. Carcinogenesis. 1995;16:119-125. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/16.1.119
  38. Armstrong MJ, Gara JP, Gealy R 3rd, Greenwood SK, Hilliard CA, Laws GM, Galloway SM. Induction of chromosome aberrations in vitro by phenolphthalein: mechanistic studies. Mutat Res. 2000;457:15-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00119-6
  39. Eastmond DA, Pinkel D. Detection of aneuploidy and aneuploidyinducing agents in human lymphocytes using fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes. Mutat Res. 1990;234:303-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(90)90041-L
  40. Huang L, Snyder AR, Morgan WF. Radiation-induced genomic instability and its implications for radiation carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2003;22:5848-5854. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206697
  41. Krajcovic M, Johnson NB, Sun Q, Normand G, Hoover N, Yao E, Richardson AL, King RW, Cibas ES, Schnitt SJ, Brugge JS, Overholtzer M. A non-genetic route to aneuploidy in human cancers. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:324-330. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2174
  42. Lorimore SA, Wright EG. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects: related inflammatory-type responses to radiation-induced stress and injury? A review. Int J Radiat Biol. 2003;79:15-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0955300021000045664
  43. Kadhim MA, Lorimore SA, Hepburn MD, Goodhead DT, Buckle VJ, Wright EG. Alpha-particle-induced chromosomal instability in human bone marrow cells. Lancet. 1994;344:987-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91643-8
  44. Pampfer S, Streffer C. Increased chromosome aberration levels in cells from mouse fetuses after zygote X-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1989;55:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553008914550091
  45. Little MP. Risks associated with ionizing radiation. Br Med Bull. 2003;68:259-275. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg031
  46. Little JB, Gorgojo L, Vetrovs H. Delayed appearance of lethal and specific gene mutations in irradiated mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;19:1425-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(90)90354-M
  47. Goldstein BD, Witz G. Free radicals and carcinogenesis. Free Radic Res Commun. 1990;11:3-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769009109662
  48. Droge W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:47-95. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00018.2001
  49. Cho YH, Jeon HK, Chung HW. Effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on delayed chromosomal instability induced by bleomycin in normal human fibroblast cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007;70:1252-1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390701429281
  50. Jin YB, Choi SH, Lee JS, Kim JK, Lee JW, Hong SC, Myung SH, Lee YS. Absence of DNA damage after 60-Hz electromagnetic field exposure combined with ionizing radiation, hydrogen peroxide, or c-Myc overexpression. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014;53:93-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-013-0506-5

Cited by

  1. Effects of 60-Hz Magnetic Fields on DNA Damage Responses in HT22 Mouse Hippocampal Cell Lines vol.15, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5515/jkiees.2015.15.3.123
  2. RecQL4-Aurora B kinase axis is essential for cellular proliferation, cell cycle progression, and mitotic integrity vol.7, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-018-0080-4