DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시간-비용 최적관계 분석용 정확해 추정기법

Exact Solution Computation Model for Time-Cost Tradeoff Analysis

  • 이동은 (경북대학교 건축.토목공학부) ;
  • 곽한성 (경북대학교 건설환경에너지공학부 대학원) ;
  • 이창용 (경북대학교 건설환경에너지공학부 대학원)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.03
  • 심사 : 2014.12.09
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28

초록

This paper presents a computational method that computes exact solution for activity overlapping involved in project time-cost tradeoff analysis. The method introduces a concept of rework cost-slope and identifies optimal overlap rate between preceding and succeeding critical activities. The mathematical concepts relative to the exact method are clearly defined and the procedures to formulate the variables are explained in detail. The method identifies the activities and their exact overlapping rates to meet a job site specific needs exactly. It maximizes usability of schedule data obtained from commercial CPM softwares(e.g., P3, SureTrak). Decision makers(i.e., project manager etc.) may make the appropriate decision in accordance with the site-specific conditions involved in the overlapping rates among critical activities. Case studies verify the usability and the validity of the system.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국연구재단

참고문헌

  1. Adeli, H. (2000), Keynote lecture: concurrent engineering in the construction industry, in Proceedings of the 7th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, P. Ghodous and D. Vandorpe (eds.), Lyon, France, 17-20 July, 2000, 578-85.
  2. Adeli, H. & Karim, A. (1997), Scheduling/cost optimization and neural dynamics model for construction, Journal of Construction Management and Engineering, ASCE, 123(4), 450-58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(450)
  3. Adeli, H. &Wu, M. (1998), Regularization neural network for construction cost estimation, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 124(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:1(18)
  4. Al-Bazi, A. & Dawood, N. (2010), Developing crew allocation system for the precast industry using genetic algorithms, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25(8), 581-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00666.x
  5. Bogus, S. M. (2005), Concurrent engineering approach to reducing design delivery time, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 131(11), 1179-85 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1179)
  6. Cheng, T.-M. & Yan, R.-Z. (2009), Integrating messy genetic algorithms and simulation to optimize resource utilization, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(6), 401-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00588.x
  7. Deshpande, V. P., Damnjanovic, I. D. & Gardoni, P. (2010), Reliability-based optimization models for scheduling pavement rehabilitation, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25(4), 227-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00636.x
  8. Hegagy, T. (2002), Computer-Based Construction Project Management, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  9. Hegazy, T., Said, M. & Kassab, M. (2011), Incorporating rework into construction schedule analysis, Automation in Construction, 20, 1051-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.006
  10. Hegazy, T., Elhakeem, A., Ahluwalia, S. S. & Attalla, M. (2012), MOST-FIT: support techniques for inspection and life cycle optimization in building asset management, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(2), 130-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00729.x
  11. Hsiao, F. Y., Wang, S. S., Wang, W. C., Wen, C. P. & Yu, W. D. (2012), Neuro-fuzzy cost estimation model enhanced by fast messy genetic algorithms for semiconductor hookup construction, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(10), 764-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00786.x
  12. Jaafari, A. (1997), Concurrent construction and life cycle project management, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 123(4), 427-36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(427)
  13. Jaafari, A. & Manivong, K. (2000), Synthesis of a model for life-cycle project management, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00168
  14. Karim, A. & Adeli, H. (1999b), CONSCOM: an OO construction scheduling and change management system, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5), 368-76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(368)
  15. Krishnan, V. (1997), A model-based framework to overlap product development activities, Management Science, 43(4), 437-45. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.437
  16. Roemer, T. A., Ahmadi, R. & Wang, R. H. (2000), Time-cost tradeoffs in overlapped product development, Operation Research, 48(6), 858-65. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.48.6.858.12396
  17. Senouci, A. B. & Adeli, H. (2001), Resource scheduling using neural dynamics model of Adeli and Park, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:1(28)
  18. Shang, H., Anumba, C. J., Bouchlaghem, D. M., Miles, J. C., Cen, M. & Taylor, M. (2005), An intelligent risk assessment system for distributed construction teams, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 12(4), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980510608839
  19. Smith, R. P. (1997), The historical roots of concurrent engineering fundamentals, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.552809
  20. Srour, I. M., Abdul-Malak, M.-A. U., Yassine, A. A. & Ramadan, M. (2013), A methodology for scheduling overlapped design activities based on dependency information, Automation in Construction, 29, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.08.001
  21. Zhang, H., Tam, C. M. & Li, H. (2006), Multimode project scheduling based on particle swarm optimization, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 21(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00420.x