DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical investigation of the buckling behavior of thin ferrocement stiffened plates

  • Koukouselis, Apostolos (Laboratory of Structural Analysis and Design, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Thessaly) ;
  • Mistakidis, Euripidis (Laboratory of Structural Analysis and Design, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Thessaly)
  • Received : 2013.07.10
  • Accepted : 2014.12.27
  • Published : 2015.03.25

Abstract

One of the most common applications of ferrocement is the manufacturing of thin stiffened plates which are prone to buckling. This study focuses on the investigation of the behavior of a ferrocement plate, stiffened in both directions by means of an appropriate grid of ribs. In the present paper detailed three-dimensional numerical Finite Element models are formulated for the simulation of the behavior of the structure under study, which are able to take into account both the geometric and material non-linearities that are present in the subject at hand (plasticity, cracking, large displacements). The difference among the formulated models lies on the use of different types of finite elements. The numerical results obtained by each model are compared and the most efficient model is determined. Finally, this model is in the sequel used for the further investigation of the effect of different parameters on the ultimate load capacity, such as the initial out-of-plane imperfection of the plate and the interaction between the axial loads in both directions.

Keywords

References

  1. Computers and Structures, Inc. (2011), "SAP2000 analysis reference manual", Comput. Struct., Inc. Berkeley, California, USA.
  2. EN1992-1-2 (2005), Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, Brussels.
  3. EN1993-1-6 (2007), Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures Part 1-6: Strength and Stability of Shell Structures, Brussels.
  4. Amdahl, J. (2009), TMR4205 Buckling and Ultimate Strength of Marine Structures Chapter 3: Buckling of Stiffened Shells, MTS-2009.05.18.
  5. Bergan, P.G. and Holand, I. (1979), "Nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete structures", J Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Eng., 17-18, 443-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(79)90027-6
  6. Byklum, E., Steen, E. and Amdahl, J. (2004), "A semi-analytical model for global buckling and postbuckling analysis of stiffened panels", Thin-Walled Struct., 42, 701-717.
  7. ECCS TC8 TWG 8.4 (2008), Shells, Buckling of Steel Shells European Design Recommendations, ECCS, 5th Edition.
  8. Fujikubo, M., Harada, M., Yao, T., Khedmati, M.R. and Yanagihara, D. (2006), "Estimation of ultimate strength of continuous stiffened panel under combined transverse thrust and lateral pressure Part 2: Continuous stiffened panel", Marine Struct., 18, 411-427.
  9. Khedmati, M.R., Zareei, M.R. and Rigo, P. (2009), "Sensitivity analysis on the elastic buckling and ultimate strength of continuous stiffened aluminium shells under combined in-plane compression and lateral pressure", Thin-Walled Struct., 47, 1232-1245.
  10. Mittelstedt, C. (2007), "Closed-form analysis of the buckling loads of uniaxially loaded blade-stringerstiffened composite shells considering periodic boundary conditions", Thin-Walled Struct., 45, 371-382.
  11. Mittelstedt, C. (2009), "Explicit local buckling analysis of stiffened composite shells accounting for periodic boundary conditions and stiffener-shell interaction", Compos. Struct., 91, 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.021
  12. MSC Marc (2011), "MSC Marc, Volume A: Theory and user information", MSC Software Corporation, USA.
  13. Naaman, A.E. (2000), Ferrocement and Laminated Cementitious Composites, Techno Press 3000., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  14. Paik, J.K., Kim, B.J. and Seo, J.K. (2008), "Methods for ultimate limit state assessment of ships and shipshaped offshore structures: Part II stiffened panels", Ocean Eng., 35, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.08.007
  15. Paik, J.K. and Seo, J.K. (2009), "Nonlinear finite element method models for ultimate strength analysis of steel stiffened-shell structures under combined biaxial compression and Lateral pressure actions-PartII: Stiffened panels", Thin-Walled Struct., 47, 998-1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2008.08.006
  16. Stamatelos, D.G., Labeas, G.N. and Tserpes, K.I. (2011), "Analytical calculation of local buckling and postbuckling behavior of isotropic and orthotropic stiffened panels", Thin-Walled Struct., 49, 422-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2010.11.008
  17. Tvergaard V. (1973), "Imperfection-Sensitivity of a wide integrally stiffened panel under compression", Int. J. Solid Structures, 9, 117-192,
  18. Ueda, Y., Rashed, S.M.H. and Paik J.K. (1995), "Buckling and ultimate strength in shells and stiffened panels under combined in plane biaxial and shearing forces", Marine Struct., 8., 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8339(95)90663-F
  19. Ventsel, E. and Krauthammer, Th. (2001), Thin Shells and Shells Theory, Analysis, and Applications, Marcel Dekker INC., New York Basel.

Cited by

  1. The use of ferrocement in the construction of squat grain silos vol.18, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.18.1.053
  2. Buckling analysis of embedded concrete columns armed with carbon nanotubes vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.5.567
  3. Buckling capacity of radially compressed thin-walled reinforced cementitious spheres vol.157, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.063
  4. Camber calculation of prestressed concrete I-Girder considering geometric nonlinearity vol.19, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.1.001