DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preferences and Acceptance of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Thailand

  • Saengow, Udomsak (Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University) ;
  • Chongsuwiwatvong, Virasakdi (Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University) ;
  • Geater, Alan (Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University) ;
  • Birch, Stephen (Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University)
  • Published : 2015.04.03

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is now common in Thailand with an increase in incidence over time. Health authorities are planning to implement a nationwide CRC screening program using fecal immunochemical test (FIT) as a primary screening tool. This study aimed to estimate preferences and acceptance of FIT and colonoscopy, explore factors influencing the acceptance, and investigate reasons behind choosing and rejecting to screen before the program was implemented. Patients aged 50-69, visiting the primary care unit during the study period, were invited to join this study. Patients with a history of cancer or past CRC screening were excluded. Face-to-face interviews were conducted. Subjects were informed about CRC and the screening tests: FIT and colonoscopy. Then, they were asked for their opinions regarding the screening. The total number of subjects was 437 (86.7% response rate). Fifty-eight percent were females. The median age was 58 years. FIT was accepted by 74.1% of subjects compared to 55.6% for colonoscopy. The acceptance of colonoscopy was associated with perceived susceptibility to CRC and family history of cancer. No symptoms, unwilling to screen, healthy, too busy and anxious about diagnosis were reasons for refusing to screen. FIT was preferred for its simplicity and non-invasiveness compared with colonoscopy. Those rejecting FIT expressed a strong preference for colonoscopy. Subjects chose colonoscopy because of its accuracy; it was refused for the process and complications. If the screening program is implemented for the entire target population in Thailand, we estimate that 106,546 will have a positive FIT, between 8,618 and 12,749 identified with advanced adenoma and between 2,645 and 3,912 identified with CRC in the first round of the program.

Keywords

References

  1. Barouni M, Larizadeh MH, Sabermahani A, et al (2012). Markov's modeling for screening strategies for colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 5125-9. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.10.5125
  2. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al (2007). Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology, 132, 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.027
  3. Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E (2009). International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 18, 1688-94. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0090
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality--United States, 2002-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 60, 884-9.
  5. Choi KS, Jun JK, Lee HY, et al (2010). Increasing uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Korea: a population-based study. BMC Public Health, 10, 265. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-265
  6. Choi KS, Lee HY, Jun JK, et al (2012). Adherence to follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test in an organized colorectal cancer screening program in Korea, 2004-2008. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27, 1070-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06944.x
  7. Cole SR, Tucker GR, Osborne JM, et al (2013). Shift to earlier stage at diagnosis as a consequence of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Med J Aust, 198, 327-30. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11357
  8. Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, et al (2013). Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med, 173, 1725-32.
  9. Hanvoravongchai P (2013). Health financing reform in Thailand: toward universal coverage under fiscal constraints.
  10. Hfocus (2013). Cabinet considering integration of 3 healthcare schemes for cancer treatments [Online]. Available: http://www.hfocus.org/content/2013/12/5734.
  11. Hilmi I, Hartono JL, Goh K (2010). Negative perception in those at highest risk--potential challenges in colorectal cancer screening in an urban Asian population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, 815-22.
  12. Hol L, van Leerdam ME, van Ballegooijen M, et al (2010). Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut, 59, 62-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.177089
  13. Honda K (2004). Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among the US urban Japanese population. Am J Public Health, 94, 815-22. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.5.815
  14. Hong NS, Kam S (2014). Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for gastric and colorectal cancer in Korea. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 9147-51. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.21.9147
  15. International Cancer Screening Network (2014). Inventory of colorectal cancer screening activities in ICSN countries, May 2008 [Online]. Available: http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/icsn/colorectal/screening.html [Accessed 9 January 2015].
  16. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, et al (2010). Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 19, 1893-907. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437
  17. Khuhaprema T, Sangrajrang S, Lalitwongsa S, et al (2014). Organised colorectal cancer screening in Lampang Province, Thailand: preliminary results from a pilot implementation programme. BMJ Open, 4, 003671.
  18. Levi Z, Rozen P, Hazazi R, et al (2007). A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med, 146, 244-55. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00003
  19. Lisi D, Hassan C, Crespi M, et al (2010). Participation in colorectal cancer screening with FOBT and colonoscopy: an Italian, multicentre, randomized population study. Dig Liver Dis, 42, 371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2009.07.019
  20. Major D, Bryant H, Delaney M, et al (2013). Colorectal cancer screening in Canada: results from the first round of screening for five provincial programs. Curr Oncol, 20, 252-7. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1646
  21. Miller A (2007). Cancer control: knowledge into action: WHO guide for effective programmes: Module 3 Geneva, World Health Organization.
  22. Misra T, Lalor E, Fedorak RN (2004). Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital. Can J Gastroenterol, 18, 221-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2004/505970
  23. Moss SM, Campbell C, Melia J, et al (2012). Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot. Gut, 61, 101-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.236430
  24. Nakama H, Zhang B, Zhang X (2001). Evaluation of the optimum cut-off point in immunochemical occult blood testing in screening for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer, 37, 398-401.
  25. National Cancer Institute (2012). Cancer in Thailand: volume 6, 2004-2006, Bangkok.
  26. National Cancer Institute (2013). National cancer control programmes (2013-2017), Bangkok, National Cancer Institute.
  27. National Health Security Office (2014). Health insurance information service center [Online]. Available: http://eis.nhso.go.th/FrontEnd/Linkcontent.aspx?menu=530000001&pid=540000025 [Accessed 30/05 2014].
  28. Nnoaham KE, Frater A, Roderick P, et al (2010). Do geodemographic typologies explain variations in uptake in colorectal cancer screening? An assessment using routine screening data in the south of England. J Public Health (Oxf), 32, 572-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq025
  29. Norwati D, Harmy MY, Norhayati MN, et al (2014). Colorectal cancer screening practices of primary care providers: results of a national survey in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 2901-4. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.6.2901
  30. Parente F, Boemo C, Ardizzoia A, et al (2013). Outcomes and cost evaluation of the first two rounds of a colorectal cancer screening program based on immunochemical fecal occult blood test in northern Italy. Endoscopy, 45, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1326105
  31. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al (2003). Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med, 349, 2191-200. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031618
  32. Popkin BM (1994). The nutrition transition in low-income countries: an emerging crisis. Nutr Rev, 52, 285-98.
  33. Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L, et al (2012). Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med, 366, 697-706. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1108895
  34. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al (1997). Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology, 112, 24-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70214-2
  35. Shim JI, Kim Y, Han MA, et al (2010). Results of colorectal cancer screening of the national cancer screening program in Korea, 2008. Cancer Res Treat, 42, 191-8. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2010.42.4.191
  36. Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, et al (2013). Cancer screening in Korea, 2012: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 6459-63. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.11.6459
  37. Sun WY, Basch CE, Wolf RL, et al (2004). Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among Chinese-Americans. Prev Med, 39, 323-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.029
  38. Tastan S, Andsoy, II, Iyigun E (2013). Evaluation of the knowledge, behavior and health beliefs of individuals over 50 regarding colorectal cancer screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 5157-63. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5157
  39. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008). Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 149, 627-37. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243
  40. Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S (1992). Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol, 15, 347-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-199212000-00018
  41. Wong MC, John GK, Hirai HW, et al (2012). Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys. Cancer Causes Control, 23, 1541-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-0031-x
  42. Wong RK, Wong ML, Chan YH, et al (2013). Gender differences in predictors of colorectal cancer screening uptake: a national cross sectional study based on the health belief model. BMC Public Health, 13, 677. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-677
  43. Yusoff HM, Daud N, Noor NM, et al (2012). Participation and barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 3983-7. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.8.3983
  44. Zhang J, Dhakal IB, Zhao Z, et al (2012). Trends in mortality from cancers of the breast, colon, prostate, esophagus, and stomach in East Asia: role of nutrition transition. Eur J Cancer Prev, 21, 480-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328351c732

Cited by

  1. HUMAN DNA QUANTIFICATION IN THE STOOLS OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER vol.52, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032015000400008
  2. High prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the Thai population: a prospective screening colonoscopy of 1,404 cases vol.16, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0526-0
  3. Patients' Preferences for Primary Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Survey of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea vol.11, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl17025
  4. National and Subnational Population-Based Incidence of Cancer in Thailand: Assessing Cancers with the Highest Burdens vol.9, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9080108
  5. Cancer incidence in northern Thailand: Results from six population-based cancer registries 1993-2012 vol.142, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31203