DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modeling of a Dual Stator Induction Generator with and Without Cross Magnetic Saturation

  • Slimene, Marwa Ben (University of Tunis, National School of Engineering of Tunis ENSIT) ;
  • Khlifi, Mohamed Arbi (University of Hail, College of Engineering Hail Research Laboratory SIME, ENSIT. Team: ETEC (Conversion and Treatment of Electrical Energy)) ;
  • Fredj, Mouldi Ben (University of Tunis, National School of Engineering of Tunis ENSIT) ;
  • Rehaoulia, Habib (University of Tunis, National School of Engineering of Tunis ENSIT)
  • 투고 : 2015.04.03
  • 심사 : 2015.06.17
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30

초록

This paper discusses general methods of modelling magnetic saturation in steady-state, two-axis (d & q) frame models of dual stator induction generators (DSIG). In particular, the important role of the magnetic coupling between the d-q axes (cross-magnetizing phenomenon) is demonstrated, with and without cross-saturation. For that purpose, two distinct models of DSIGs, with and without cross-saturation, are specified. These two models are verified by an application that is sensitive to the presence of cross-saturation, to prove the validity of these final methods and the equivalence between all developed models. Advantages of some of the models over the existing ones and their applicability are discussed. In addition, an alternative is given to evaluate all saturation factors (static and dynamic) by just calculating the static magnetizing inductance which is simply the magnitude of the ratio of the magnetizing flux to the current. The comparison between the simulation results of the proposed model with experimental results gives a good correspondence, especially at startup.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. Ben Slimene, M. A. Khlifi, M. Benfredj, and H. Rehaoulia, Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers 24, 1450169 (2015).
  2. M. Archana, S. Nanoty, and A. R. Chudasama, IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium (ESTS) 42, 283 (2011).
  3. T. A. Lipo, International Conference on Electrical Machines, Athens, Greece 860 (1980).
  4. R. Bojoi, M. Lazzari, F. Profumo, and A. Tenconi, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 39, 752 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2003.811790
  5. E. Levi, IEEE Trans. Indus. Electronics 55, 1893 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.918488
  6. A. Tessarolo, 5th IET Int. Conf. on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD). 1 (2010).
  7. O. Olorunfemi and W. Zhiqiao, IEEE Trans. Indus. Applications 44, 1099 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2008.926058
  8. R. N. Andriamalala, H. Razik, and G. Didier, IEEE Industrial Application Society Annual Meeting-IAS, Tampa, Florida, USA (2006).
  9. M. A. Khlifi and H. Rehaoulia, Int. J. Phys. Sci. 6, 4928 (2011).
  10. E. Levi, IEEE Trans. Energy Conver 12, 211 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/60.629705
  11. K. Idjdarene, D. Rekiou, T. Rekioua, and A. Tounzi, Energy Conversion and Management 49, 2609 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.05.014
  12. S. Nandi, IEEE Trans. on Ind. Applic. 40, 1302 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2004.834101
  13. D. Joshi and K. S. Sandhu, International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 3, 68 (2009).
  14. H. Amimeur, D. Aouzellag, R. Abdessemed, and K. Ghedamsi, Electrical Power and Energy Systems 42, 60 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.024
  15. G. K. Singh, A. Senthil, and R. P. Saini, European Transactions on Electrical Power 20, 884 (2010).