Journal of ILASS-Korea (한국분무공학회지)

Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems-Korea (한국분무공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison on Exhaust Gas of Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks; THC and CO Emission Affected by NOx Control Devices (EGR, SCR)

대형 경유트럭의 NOx 저감장치에 따른 배출가스 특성비교

  • Received : 2015.08.15
  • Accepted : 2015.09.22
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With increasing of GDP, the registration number of passenger cars has exceeded 20 million last year in Korea. Especially, the registration number of the diesel engine vehicles has been increasing. However, the WHO(World Health Organization) IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) has reported that diesel engine exhaust gas is an one of HAPs, which has carcinogenic for human, and they have designated it to Group 1. To solve this problem, exhaust gas from diesel engines has to be controlled. Thus, it has been controlling by European regulatory standard in Korea. On the other hand, in order to meet the enhanced emission regulations, all manufacturing company applied $NO_x$ control device to vehicles such as EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation), SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) and so on. However, these devices (EGR, SCR) were operated by difference reaction mechanism respectively, and the composition of exhaust gas would be differenced from that of them. In this study, it was conducted to evaluate variety characteristics on changing of exhaust gas composition by each $NO_x$ control device, and the heavy duty diesel trucks were chosen as experimental vehicles. From the result, it revealed that vehicles (with EGR) were discharged higher THC as 52.5% than that of others (with SCR). However, it did not followed that trend, in the case of CO; it was discharged as 57.2% lower than that of others (with SCR). In the future, these data would be used to apply to efficient $NO_x$ control device for meeting to EURO 6.

Keywords

References

  1. NIER, "National air pollutants emissions statistics", 2012.
  2. MOLIT, "The number of vehicle registration, press released", 2014.
  3. MEST, "Status of technology development on diesel engine for low emission air pollutant", 2009.
  4. SK ENERGY, "Gasoline engine vs diesel engine", 2015.
  5. NIER, "Capss emissions", 2011.
  6. IARC, "Diesel engine exhaust carcinogenic, press release", N213, 21-4, 2012.
  7. Clean air conservation act, "Emission standard for vehicles", 2014.
  8. Buslife, "EGR vs SCR", Buslife hompage, 2015.
  9. J. Zhang, "Diesel emission technology - part II of automotive aftertreatment system", Bowmannz hompage, 2010.
  10. Jose Maria Lopez, Felipe Jimenez, Francisco Aparicio and Nuria Flores, "On-road emissions from urban buses with SCR + Urea and EGR + DPF systems using diesel and biodiesel", Transportation Research, 14, 2009, pp. 1-5.
  11. J. D. Herner, S. Hu, W. H. Robertson, T. Huai, J. F. Collins, H. Dwye and A. Ayala, "Effect of advanced aftertreatment for PM and $NO_x$ control on heavy-duty diesel truck emissions", Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 2009, pp. 5928-5933. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9008294
  12. T. Huai, S. D. Shah, J. Wayne Miller, T. Younglove, D. J. Chernich and A. Ayala, "Analysis of heavy-duty diesel truck activity and emissions data", Atmospheric Environment, 40, 2006, pp. 2333-2344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.006
  13. C. Chen, C. Huang, Q. Jing, H. Wang, H. Pan, L. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Dai, H. Huang, L. Schipper and D. G. Streets, "On-road emission characteristics of heavy-duty diesel vehicles in Shanghai", Atmospheric Environment, 41, 2007, pp. 5334-5344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.02.037
  14. L. Pelkmans, P. Debal, "Comparison of on-road emissions with emissions measured on chassis dynamometer test cycles", Transportation Research Part D, 11, 2006, pp. 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2006.04.001
  15. NIER, "A study on the establishment test method and emission standard for heavy duty chassis dynamometer", 2006.
  16. J. H. Seo, "A numerical study for development of urea SCR model to predict De-NOX performance under diesel engine exhaust gas composition", Kookmin University, 2012.
  17. K. Hong, K. Choi, H. Lee, S. Park and C. Lee, "Experimental investigation of urea dosing control unit in urea SCR system on injection characteristics and control strategy for $NO_x$ reduction", KSAE, 08-S0088, 2008, pp. 540-545.
  18. Z. Gerald liu, D. R. Berg, T. A. Swor and J. J. Schauer, "Comparative analysis on the effects of diesel particulate filter and selective catalytic reduction systems on a wide spectrum of chemical species emissions", Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 2008, pp. 6080-6085. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8004046
  19. Ministry of trade, industry & energy, "Regulation on energy consumption efficiency of vehicle and label of level", 2015.
  20. S. Lee, J. H. Chang, Y. Lee, S. Oh, Y. Kim and D. Kim, "Effect of Intake Pressure on Emissions and Performance in low temperature combustion operation of a diesel engine", Transactions of KSAE, 20(1), 2012, pp. 88-94.
  21. S. Cho, K. C. Oh and C. B. Lee, "Characteristics of low temperature combustion in sing cylinder engine by high EGR rate", Transactions of KSAE, 7(4), 2009 pp. 79-85.
  22. Z. Gerald liu and D. R. Berg, "Effects of a zeoliteselective catalytic reduction system on comprehensive emissions from heavy-duty diesel engine", Air Waste Management Association, 58, 2008, pp. 1258-1265. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.58.10.1258