Journal of Chest Surgery

The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (대한심장혈관흉부외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study of Cryostripping and Endovenous Laser Therapy for Varicose Veins: Mid-Term Results

  • Lee, Kwang Hyoung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Jae Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kwang Taik (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sung Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Ho Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Jae Seung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hee Jung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seung Hun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.09.22
  • Accepted : 2014.11.08
  • Published : 2015.10.05
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Conventional stripping is considered to be the standard procedure for great saphenous vein (GSV) varicosities, but many other alternative treatments such as cryostripping, endovenous laser therapy (EVLT), radiofrequency ablation, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy have been developed. Among them, both cryostripping and laser therapy have been reported to be less traumatic, with lower rates of complications and recurrences when compared to conventional stripping. To compare the efficacy of these treatments, we have analyzed and compared the mid-term clinical outcomes of cryostripping and EVLT. Methods: Patients diagnosed with varicose veins of the GSV and treated with cryostripping or laser therapy between September 2008 and April 2013 were enrolled in this study. Duplex ultrasonography was used for the diagnosis and evaluation of varicosity and reflux, and the clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology classification was used to measure the clinical severity. The symptoms, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), recurrence rates, and complication rates of the cryostripping and laser therapy groups were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. 32 patients were treated with cryostripping, and 36 patients were treated with laser therapy. The median follow-up period was 29.6 months. Recurrence was noted in three patients from the cryostripping group and in two patients from the EVLT group. There was no difference in the VCSS score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, and complication rate between the cryostripping group and the EVLT group. Conclusion: The mid-term clinical outcomes of cryostripping were not inferior to those of EVLT. Further, considering its cost-effectiveness, cryostripping seems to be a safe and feasible method for the treatment of varicose veins.

Keywords

References

  1. Khilnani NM, Winokur RS, Butler DF, Miller JJ, de la Torre JI. Varicose vein treatment with endovenous laser therapy [Internet]. New York (NY): Medscape; 2014 [cited 2014 Apr 10]. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1815850-overview.
  2. Menyhei G, Gyevnar Z, Arato E, Kelemen O, Kollar L. Conventional stripping versus cryostripping: a prospective randomised trial to compare improvement in quality of life and complications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;35:218-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.08.017
  3. Min RJ, Khilnani N, Zimmet SE. Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:991-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000082864.05622.E4
  4. Fischer R, Linde N, Duff C, Jeanneret C, Chandler JG, Seeber P. Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:236-40. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.115802
  5. Disselhoff BC, Buskens E, Kelder JC, der Kinderen DJ, Moll FL. Randomised comparison of costs and cost-effectiveness of cryostripping and endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins: 2-year results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37:357-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.11.013
  6. Eklof B, Rutherford RB, Bergan JJ, et al. Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:1248-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.027
  7. Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Zumaeta-Garcia M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatments of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2011;53(5 Suppl):49S-65S.
  8. Darwood RJ, Theivacumar N, Dellagrammaticas D, Mavor AI, Gough MJ. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2008;95: 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6101
  9. Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Hedayati M, et al. Endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) for the saphenous reflux and varicose veins: a follow-up study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2013;57:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02457.x
  10. Mozafar M, Atqiaee K, Haghighatkhah H, Taheri MS, Tabatabaey A, Lotfollahzadeh S. Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein versus high ligation: long-term results. Lasers Med Sci 2014;29:765-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1389-z
  11. Sybrandy JE, Wittens CH. Initial experiences in endovenous treatment of saphenous vein reflux. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:1207-12. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.128936
  12. Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC, Moll FL. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011;98:1107-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7542
  13. Ravi R, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, Trayler EA, Barrett DA, Ramaiah V, Diethrich EB. Endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins: a large single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:244-8. https://doi.org/10.1583/05-1760R.1
  14. Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC, Moll FL. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2008;95:1232-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6351
  15. Van Rij AM, Jones GT, Hill GB, Jiang P. Neovascularization and recurrent varicose veins: more histologic and ultrasound evidence. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.04.031

Cited by

  1. Comparison of endovenous laser treatment and high ligation in treatment of limb varicosity: A meta‐analysis vol.16, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13083
  2. Draft Revision of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Varicose Veins -Treatment- vol.18, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.37923/phle.2020.18.2.29