DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Potential Economic Impacts of the Vietnam-Korea Free Trade Agreement on Vietnam

  • Published : 2016.03.31

Abstract

This paper provides an assessment of the potential economic impacts of the Vietnam-Korea free trade agreement on Vietnam, by using general equilibrium modeling. The results show that Vietnam-Korea FTA will increase aggregate welfare for both countries in the long run. The most important gains accrue from better allocation of resources consequent to trade liberalization. All the sectoral differences and changes are consistent with the trade profiles of the two countries, and the long-run results are more pronounced than those of the short-run. In comparison with other ASEAN countries, the CGE analysis suggests that Vietnam's agriculture exports to Korea would especially rise in the long run. However, there will be strong competition in this sector among ASEAN members. Thus, an earlier conclusion of a comprehensive FTA with Korea is expected to be a good strategy for Vietnam, so as to avoid the direct competition with ASEAN members in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. ADB. 2010. Methods for Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Free Trade Agreements. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015)
  2. ADB. 2011. Methodology for Impact Assessment of Free Trade Agreements. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015)
  3. Adams, P. D., Huff, K. M., McDougall, R., Pearson, R. and A. A. Powell. 1997. "Mediumand Long-Run Consequences for Australia of an APEC Free Trade Area: CGE Analyses Using the GTAP and Monash Models," Asia-Pacific Economic Review, vol. 3, no.1, pp. 19-42.
  4. Ahmed, S. 2010. India-Korea CEPA: Potentials and Realities. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015)
  5. Armington, P. 1969. "A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production," IMF Staff Papers, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 159-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866403
  6. ASEAN Secretariat. 2013. Southeast Asia: A Free Trade Area. Official website (accessed Nov. 21, 2015)
  7. ASEAN-KOREA FTA-Home page: (accessed Nov. 21, 2015)
  8. Balassa, B. 1965. "Trade Liberalization and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage," Manche ster School of Economic and Social Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 99-123.
  9. Baldwin, R. 1992. "Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1086/261811
  10. Baldwin, R. and A. J. Venables. 1995. Regional Economic Integration. In Grossman, G. M. and K. Rogoff (eds.). Handbook of International Economics. Vol. III. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  11. Batra, A. 2007. "Asian Economic Integration: ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE24-2A
  12. Bchir, M. H. and M. Fouquin. 2006. Economic Integration in Asia: Bilateral Free Trade Agreements Versus Asian Single Market. CEPII Working Paper No. 2006-15. CEPII Research Center.
  13. Bhagwati, J. 1968. Trade Liberalization Among LDCs, Trade Theory and GATT Rules. In Hicks, J. and J. N. Wolfe (eds.). Value, Capital and Growth: papers in honour of Sir John Hicks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
  14. Boyer, I. and A. Schuschny. 2010. Quantitative Assessment of a Free Trade Agreement between MERCOSUR and the European Union, CEPAL, Statistics and Economic Projections Div., Natural Resources and Infrastructure Div.
  15. Cheong, I. 2005. Estimation of Economic Effects of FTAs in East Asia-CGE Approach, In Ahn, C. Y., Baldwin, R., Cheong, I. (eds.), East Asian Economic Regionalism: Feasibilities and Challenges. Netherlands: Springer.
  16. Cheong, I. 2012. "Korea-Vietnam Bilateral FTA: Issues and Economic Impacts," Journal of International Trade and Industry Studies, vol.17, no.2, pp. 1-23. (in Korean)
  17. Cororaton, C. 2004. Philippine-Japan Bilateral Agreements: Analysis of Possible Effects on Unemployment, Distribution and Poverty in the Philippines Using CGE Microsimulation Approach. Discussion Paper Series no. 2004-01. Philippines Institute for Development Studies.
  18. Dimaranan, B., Duc, L. T. and W. Martin. 2005. Potential Economic Impacts of Merchandise Trade Liberalization under Viet Nam's Accession to the WTO, GTAP Resource # 1777, GTAP Resource Centre, Purdue University.
  19. Francois, J. F. and B. J. McDonald. 1996. Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 7. Purdue University.
  20. Frankel, J., Stein. E., Wei, S. J. 1995. "Trading Blocs And The Americas: The Natural, The Unnatural, And The Super-Natural," Journal of Development Economics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 61-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(95)00005-4
  21. General Statistics Office of Vietnam. 2013. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015)
  22. Hanslow, K. 2001. A General Welfare Decomposition for CGE Models. GTAP Technical Paper No. 19. Purdue University.
  23. Hertel, T. W. and M. E. Tsigas. 1997. Structure of GTAP. In Hertel, T. W. (ed.). Global Trade Analysis Modeling and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 13-73.
  24. Hertel, T., Hummels, D., Ivanic, M. and R. Keeney. 2007. "How Confident Can We Be in CGE-Based Assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 611-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.12.002
  25. Huff, K. and T. Hertel. 2001. Decomposing Welfare Changes in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 5. Purdue University.
  26. Park, I. 2003. "A CGE Analysis of a Korea-China-Japan Free Trade Area," Economic Papers, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 151-186.
  27. Kawasaki, K. 2003. The Impact of Free Trade Agreements in Asia. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 03-E-18, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.
  28. Korea International Trade Association (KITA) Statistics 2013. (accessed Nov. 21, 2015)
  29. Siriwardana. M. and J. Yang, 2008, "GTAP Model Analysis of the Economic Effects of an Australia-China FTA: Welfare and Sectoral Aspects," Global Economic Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265080802273315
  30. Malcolm, G. 1998. Adjusting Tax Rates in the GTAP Data Base. GTAP Technical Paper 12, Purdue University.
  31. MUTRAP. 2010. Impact assessment of ASEAN-Korea FTA on Vietnam Economy. European Trade Policy and Investment Support Project (EU-MUTRAP) Report.
  32. United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD), 2016. United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database.
  33. Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VCCI), 2016, Vietnam-Korea towards Shared Peace and Prosperity. (accessed Jan. 15, 2016)
  34. WTO. 2012. Chapter 3. Analyzing Bilateral Trade Using the Gravity Equation. A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. WTO Publication. pp. 103-135.