DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Pulsatile Versus Nonpulsatile Blood Flow on Viscoelasticity and Red Blood Cell Aggregation in Extracorporeal Circulation

  • Ahn, Chi Bum (Department of Molecular Medicine, Gachon University Graduate School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Yang Jun (Department of Mechatronics, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Myoung Gon (Department of Mechatronics, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Yang, Sung (Department of Mechatronics, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lim, Choon Hak (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Son, Ho Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Ji Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, So Young (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Kuk Hui (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sun, Kyung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center)
  • Received : 2015.08.18
  • Accepted : 2015.09.30
  • Published : 2016.06.05

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) can induce alterations in blood viscoelasticity and cause red blood cell (RBC) aggregation. In this study, the authors evaluated the effects of pump flow pulsatility on blood viscoelasticity and RBC aggregation. Methods: Mongrel dogs were randomly assigned to two groups: a nonpulsatile pump group (n=6) or a pulsatile pump group (n=6). After ECC was started at a pump flow rate of 80 mL/kg/min, cardiac fibrillation was induced. Blood sampling was performed before and at 1, 2, and 3 hours after ECC commencement. To eliminate bias induced by hematocrit and plasma, all blood samples were adjusted to a hematocrit of 45% using baseline plasma. Blood viscoelasticity, plasma viscosity, hematocrit, arterial blood gas analysis, central venous $O_2$ saturation, and lactate were measured. Results: The blood viscosity and aggregation index decreased abruptly 1 hour after ECC and then remained low during ECC in both groups, but blood elasticity did not change during ECC. Blood viscosity, blood elasticity, plasma viscosity, and the aggregation index were not significantly different in the groups at any time. Hematocrit decreased abruptly 1 hour after ECC in both groups due to dilution by the priming solution used. Conclusion: After ECC, blood viscoelasticity and RBC aggregation were not different in the pulsatile and nonpulsatile groups in the adult dog model. Furthermore, pulsatile flow did not have a more harmful effect on blood viscoelasticity or RBC aggregation than nonpulsatile flow.

Keywords

References

  1. Benedetti M, De Caterina R, Bionda A, et al. Blood-artificial surface interactions during cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparative study of four oxygenators. Int J Artif Organs 1990;13:488-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/039139889001300808
  2. Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Graaff R, Rijnsburger AA, Mungroop H, van Oeveren W. Pressure drop, shear stress, and activation of leukocytes during cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between hollow fiber and flat sheet membrane oxygenators. Artif Organs 2000;24:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06351.x
  3. Milam JD, Austin SF, Martin RF, Keats AS, Cooley DA. Alteration of coagulation and selected clinical chemistry parameters in patients undergoing open heart surgery without transfusions. Am J Clin Pathol 1981;76:155-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/76.2.155
  4. Hickey PR, Buckley MJ, Philbin DM. Pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass: review of a counterproductive controversy. Ann Thorac Surg 1983;36:720-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60286-X
  5. Thurston GB. Viscoelasticity of human blood. Biophys J 1972;12:1205-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86156-3
  6. Thurston GB. Viscoelastic properties of blood and blood analogs. In: How TV, editor. Advances in hemodynamics and hemorheology. New York (NY): JAI Press; 1996. p. 1-30.
  7. Kasser U, Heimburge P, Walitza E. Viscoelasticity of whole blood and its dependence on laboratory parameters. Clin Hemorheol Micro 1989;9:307-12.
  8. Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ. Blood rheology and hemodynamics. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003;29:435-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-44551
  9. Gu YJ, Graaff R, de Hoog E, et al. Influence of hemodilution of plasma proteins on erythrocyte aggregability: an in vivo study in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2005;33:95-107.
  10. Morariu AM, Gu YJ, Huet RC, Siemons WA, Rakhorst G, Oeveren WV. Red blood cell aggregation during cardiopulmonary bypass: a pathogenic cofactor in endothelial cell activation? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:939-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.06.010
  11. Qian KX, Zeng P, Ru WM, Yuan HY, Feng ZG, Li I. How to produce a pulsatile flow with low haemolysis? J Med Eng Technol 2000;24:227-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091900050204278
  12. Hardeman MR, Goedhart PT, Dobbe JG, Lettinga KP. Laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA): a new instrument for measurement of various structural hemorheological parameters. Clin Hemorheol 1994;14:605-18.
  13. Kameneva MV, Antaki JF, Borovetz HS, et al. Mechanisms of red blood cell trauma in assisted circulation: rheologic similarities of red blood cell transformations due to natural aging and mechanical stress. ASAIO J 1995;41:M457-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002480-199507000-00051
  14. Undar A, Henderson N, Thurston GB, et al. The effects of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion on blood viscoelasticity before and after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in a neonatal piglet model. Artif Organs 1999;23:717-21. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06408.x
  15. Linderkamp O. Blood rheology in the newborn infant. Baillieres Clin Haematol 1987;1:801-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3536(87)80025-2
  16. Alkan T, Akcevin A, Undar A, Turkoglu H, Paker T, Aytac A. Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery in pediatric heart surgery: a pilot clinical study. ASAIO J 2006;52:530-5.
  17. Brecher G, Bessis M. Present status of spiculed red cells and their relationship to the discocyte-echinocyte transformation: a critical review. Blood 1972;40:333-44.
  18. Reinhart WH, Chien S. Echinocyte-stomatocyte transformation and shape control of human red blood cells: morphological aspects. Am J Hematol 1987;24:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.2830240102
  19. Agroyannis B, Dalamangas A, Tzanatos H, et al. Alterations in echinocyte transformation and erythrocyte sedimentation rate during hemodialysis. Artif Organs 1997;21:327-30.
  20. Saltman P. Oxidative stress: a radical view. Semin Hematol 1989;26:249-56.
  21. Snyder LM, Fortier NL, Trainor J, et al. Effect of hydrogen peroxide exposure on normal human erythrocyte deformability, morphology, surface characteristics, and spectrin-hemoglobin cross-linking. J Clin Invest 1985;76:1971-7. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112196
  22. Hashimoto H, Mio T, Sumino K. Lipid abnormalities of erythrocyte membranes in hemodialysis patients with chronic renal failure. Clin Chim Acta 1996;252:137-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(96)06317-6
  23. Luciak M, Trznadel K. Free oxygen species metabolism during haemodialysis with different membranes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1991;6 Suppl 3:66-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/6.1.66

Cited by

  1. Continuous and simultaneous measurement of the biophysical properties of blood in a microfluidic environment vol.141, pp.24, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6an01593j
  2. Microfluidic-Based Measurement Method of Red Blood Cell Aggregation under Hematocrit Variations vol.17, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092037
  3. Microfluidic-based measurement of RBC aggregation and the ESR using a driving syringe system vol.10, pp.16, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ay02719b
  4. In vitroandex vivomeasurement of the biophysical properties of blood using microfluidic platforms and animal models vol.143, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8an00231b
  5. Periodic and simultaneous quantification of blood viscosity and red blood cell aggregation using a microfluidic platform underin-vitroclosed-loop circulation vol.12, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017052
  6. Microfluidic-Based Technique for Measuring RBC Aggregation and Blood Viscosity in a Continuous and Simultaneous Fashion vol.9, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9090467
  7. SELECTION OF THE MODE OF CARDIOPULMONAY BYPASS IN AGED AND GERIATRIC PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING vol.2019, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2019-1-2-149-142-146
  8. Microfluidic-Based Biosensor for Sequential Measurement of Blood Pressure and RBC Aggregation Over Continuously Varying Blood Flows vol.10, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090577
  9. Microfluidic-based effective monitoring of bloods by measuring RBC aggregation and blood viscosity under stepwise varying shear rates vol.32, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13367-020-0003-8
  10. Simultaneous measurement method of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and erythrocyte deformability in resource-limited settings vol.41, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ab71f3
  11. Ultrasound Standing Wave-Based Cell-to-liquid Separation for Measuring Viscosity and Aggregation of Blood Sample vol.20, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082284
  12. Use of a Virtual Mock Loop model to evaluate a new left ventricular assist device for transapical insertion vol.43, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/0391398820907104
  13. Quantitative Monitoring of Dynamic Blood Flows Using Coflowing Laminar Streams in a Sensorless Approach vol.11, pp.16, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167260