Journal of Forest and Environmental Science

Institute of Forest Science, kangwon National University (강원대학교 산림과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tree Species Diversity and Its Population and Regeneration Status in Homegardens of Upper Assam, Northeast India

  • Saikia, P. (Centre for Environmental Sciences, Central University of Jharkhand) ;
  • Khan, M.L. (Department of Botany, Dr. Hari Singh Gour Central University)
  • Received : 2015.09.01
  • Accepted : 2016.01.13
  • Published : 2016.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Study was conducted to investigate tree diversity and its population and regeneration status in homegardens of upper Assam, Northeast India through field study by quadrat method. A total of 154 tree species have been recorded from 135 studied homegardens under 109 genera 53 families. Most of these species (79%) are indigenous to our country, while the rest (21%) arealiens (naturalized and cultivated exotics) by origin. Tree species richness per homegarden varies greatly in different homegardens and is ranged from 5 to 52 tree species with a mean of 22 ($SE{\pm}0.58$). A. malaccensis is the most dominant tree species in the studied homegardens contributed 34% of the total tree density of the documented trees. The tree density is much higher with 4,259 individuals $ha^{-1}$ but, basal area ($36.32m^2ha^{-1}$) is very less. Based on the number of individuals present, very rare species is accounted for 10%, rare species 39%, common species 19%, dominants 14% and predominant species 18% in the present study. The population density of 154 tree species is 4,259 (individuals $ha^{-1}$) for adults (>3.18 cm DBH), 5,902 (individuals $ha^{-1}$) for saplings and 38,164 (individuals $ha^{-1}$) for seedlings. The density of seedlings>saplings>adults represents good regeneration status of tree species in studied homegardens. The population structure study showed that about 8% tree species have good regeneration status, 9% have fair regeneration status, 48% have poor regeneration status and 34% tree species have no regeneration. Study suggests that research and development action is needed to stimulate regeneration of those tree species which having high importance value indices but showing poor or no regeneration. Based on present observation, it can be conclude that homegarden can emerge as an effective means for both economic well-being and biodiversity conservation in upper Assam, Northeast India.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdoellah OS, Hadikusumah HY, Takeuchi K, Okubo S, Parikesit. 2006. Commercialization of home gardens in an Indonesian village: vegetation composition and functional changes. Agrofor Syst 68: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-7475-x
  2. Akinnifesi FK, Sileshi G, Ajayi OC, Akinnifesi AI, de Moura EG, Linhares JFP, Rodrigues I. 2010. Biodiversity of the urban homegardens of Sao Luis city, Northeastern Brazil. Urban Ecosyst 13: 129-146.
  3. Akinnifesi FK, Sileshi G, Joselene da Costa, de Moura EG, da Silva RF, Ajayi OC, Linhares JFP, Akinnifesi AI, de Araujo M, Rodrigues MAI. 2010. Floristic composition and canopy structure of homegardens in Sao Luis city, Maranhao State, Brazil. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 2: 72-86.
  4. Ali AMS. 2005. Homegardens in smallholder farming systems: examples from Bangladesh. Human Ecol 33: 245-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-005-2434-8
  5. Behera SK, Mishra AK, Sahu N, Kumar A, Singh N, Kumar A, Bajpai O, Chaudhary LB, Khare PB, Tuli R. 2012. The study of microclimate in response to different plant community association in tropical moist deciduous forest from northern India. Biodiversity Conservation 21: 1159-1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0230-5
  6. Borthakur SK, Sarma TR, Nath KK, Deka P. 1998. The house gardens of Assam: a traditional Indian experience of management and conservation of biodiversity- I. Ethnobotany 10: 32-37.
  7. Census of India. 2011. Census report. Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India.
  8. Curtis JT, Cottam G. 1956. Plant ecology work book. Laboratory field reference manual. Burgess Pub. Co., Minneapolis, MN.
  9. Das T, Das AK. 2005. Inventorying plant biodiversity in homegardens: A case study in Barak Valley, Assam, North East India. Current Science 89: 155-163.
  10. Devi NL, Das AK. 2010. Plant species diversity in the traditional homegardens of Meitei community: a case study from Barak Valley, Assam. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 48: 45-48.
  11. George SJ, Kumar BM, Rajiv GR. 1993. Nature of secondary succession in the abandoned Eucalyptus plantations of Neyyar (Kerala) in the peninsular India. Trop For Sci 5: 372-386.
  12. Guedje NM, Lejoly J, Nkongmeneck BA, Jonkers WBJ. 2003. Population dynamics of Garcinialucida (Clusiaceae) in Cameroonian Atlantic forests. Forest Ecology and Management 177: 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00444-9
  13. Hazarika P, Biswas SC, Kalita RK. 2014. A Case Study on People’s Choice Conservation of Biodiversity in Homesteads of Assam, India. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3: 89-94.
  14. Hodgkin T. 2001. Home gardens and the maintenance of genetic diversity. In: Proceeding of the second International Home Garden Workshop (Watson JW, Eyzaguirre PB, eds). Biodiversity International, Rome, Italy, pp 14-18.
  15. Holl KD, Loik ME, Lin EH, Samuels I. 2000. Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: Overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restoration Ecology 8: 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80049.x
  16. Hoogerbrugge ID, Fresco LO. 1993. Homegarden systems: agricultural characteristics and challenges. Gatekeeper, Series no. 39. International institute for environment and development, London, UK.
  17. Hubbell SP. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203: 1299-1309. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.203.4387.1299
  18. Kadavul K, Parthasarathy N. 1999. Plant biodiversity and conservation of tropical semi-evergreen forest in the Shervarayan hills of Eastern Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 421-439.
  19. Karyono. 1990. Homegardens in Java: their structure and functions. In: Tropical Homegardens (Landauer K, Brazil M, eds). United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan, pp 138-146.
  20. Kumar BM, George SJ, Chinnamani S. 1994. Diversity, structure and standing stock of wood in the homegardens of Kerala in peninsular India. Agrofor Syst 25: 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00707463
  21. Kumar BM, Nair PKR. 2004. The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst 61: 135-152.
  22. Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 145-146.
  23. Misra R. 1968. Ecology workbook. Oxford & IBH Publishing Company, Calcutta.
  24. Muhammed N, Masum MFH, Hossain MM, Chakma S, Oesten G, Detten R von. 2011. Floral composition and biodiversity conservation in homestead forests in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 7: 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.629211
  25. Mustafa MM, Hall JB, Teklehaimanot Z. 2000. Indigenous management techniques in Bangladesh homegardens. Int Tree Crop J 10: 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01435698.2000.9753008
  26. Odum HT. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. W.B. Saunders and Co, Philadelphia, pp 574.
  27. Sahoo UK. 2009. Traditional home gardens and livelihood security in North-East India. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 7: 665-670.
  28. Sahoo UK, Rocky P, Vanlalhriatpuia K, Upadhyaya K. 2010. Structural diversity and functional dynamism of traditional home gardens of North-East India. The Bioscan 1: 159-171.
  29. Saikia P, Choudhury BI, Khan ML. 2012. Floristic composition and plant utilization pattern in homegardens of Upper Assam, India. Tropical Ecology 53: 105-118.
  30. Saikia P, Khan ML. 2013. Population structure and regeneration status of Aquilaria malaccensis Lam. in homegardens of upper Assam, NE India. Tropical Ecology 54: 1-13.
  31. Saikia P, Khan ML. 2014. Homegardens of upper Assam, northeast India: a typical example of on farm conservation of Agarwood (Aquilariamalaccensis Lam.). International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 10: 262-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.973449
  32. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, pp 117.
  33. Shastri CM, Bhat DM, Nagaraja BC, Murali KS, Ravindranath NH. 2002. Tree species diversity in a village ecosystem in Uttara Kannada district in Western Ghats, Karnataka. Current Science 82: 1080-1084.
  34. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  35. Smith RM, Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Warren PH, Gaston KJ. 2006. Urban domestic gardens (IX): composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biol Conserv 129: 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.045
  36. Soemarwoto O, Soemarwoto I, Karyono, et al. 1975. The Javanese home garden as an integrated ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the International congress on the human environment. Science council of Japan, Kyoto, Japan, pp 193-197.
  37. Sommers P. 1978. Traditional home gardens of selected Philippine households and their potential for improving human nutrition. MS thesis. University of the Philippines, Los Banos, The Philippines.
  38. Stoler A. 1975. Garden use and household consumption pattern in a Javanese village. PhD thesis. Department of anthropology, Columbia University, New York.
  39. Swamy PS, Sundarapandian SM, Chandrasekar P, Chandrasekaran S. 2000. Plant species diversity and tree population structure of a humid tropical forest in Tamil Nadu, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1643-1669. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026511812878
  40. Tangjang S, Arunachalam A. 2009. Role of traditional homegarden systems in northeast India. IJTK 8: 47-50.
  41. Trinh LN, Watson JW, Hue NN, De NN, Minh NV, Chu P, Sthapit BR, Eyzaguirre PB. 2003. Agrobiodiversity conservation and development in Vietnamese home gardens. Agric Ecosyst Environ 97: 317-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00228-1
  42. Tynsong H, Tiwari BK. 2010. Plant Diversity in the Homegardens and their Significance in the Livelihoods of War Khasi Community of Meghalaya, North-east India. J Biodiversity 1: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766901.2010.11884713
  43. Uma Shankar. 2001. A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorearobusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Curr Sci 81: 776-786.
  44. Vogl CR, Vogl-Lukasser B. 2003. Tradition, dynamics and sustainability of plant species composition and management in homegardens on organic and nonorganic small scale farms in Alpine Eastern Tyrol, Austria. Biol Agric Hortic 21: 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2003.9755278
  45. Whitford PB. 1949. Distribution of woodland plants in relation to succession and clonal growth. Ecology 30: 199-208. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931186
  46. Whitmore TC. 1975. Tropical rain forest of the Far East. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
  47. Zimik L, Saikia P, Khan ML. 2012. Comparative study on homegardens of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh in terms of species diversity and plant utilization pattern. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences (An International Journal) 3: 611-618.