Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

  • 제17권9호
  • /
  • Pages.4463-4467
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1513-7368(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2476-762X(eISSN)
아시아태평양암예방학회 (Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines

  • 발행 : 2016.09.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: To review the impact of using intra-operative ultrasound guided breast conserving surgery with frozen sections on final pathological margin outcome with the current guidelines set forth by the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) and the American Society of Surgical Oncology (ASTRO). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review including all cases of intra-operative ultrasound guided breast conserving surgery was performed at the National Cancer Institute Thailand between 2013 and 2016. Patient demographics, tumor variables, intraoperative frozen section and final pathological margin outcomes were collected. Factors for positive or close margins were analyzed. Results: A total of 86 patients aged between 27 and 75 years with intra-operative ultrasound guided breast conserving surgery were included. Three cases (3.5%) of positive margin were detected by intra-operative frozen section and 4 cases (4.7%) by final pathology reports. There were 18 cases (20.9%) with a close margin (<1 mm). Factors affecting this result comprised multi-foci, presence of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) combined with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Conclusions: With the current SSO/ASTRO for adequate margin guidelines, using intra-operative ultrasound to locate the boundary for resection with breast conserving surgery provided a high success rate in obtaining final pathology free margin outcomes and minimizing re-operation risks especially when combined with intra-operative frozen section assessment. The chance of finding positive or close margins appears higher in cases of IDC combined with DCIS, ILC and with multi-foci cancers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, Contesso G (1996). Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. institut gustave- roussy breast cancer group. J Clin Oncol, 14, 1558-64. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1996.14.5.1558
  2. Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al (2006). The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J, 12, 331-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00271.x
  3. Bani MR, Lux MP, Wenkel HE, et al (2009). Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. EJSO, 35, 32-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008
  4. Bodilsen A, Bjerre K, Offersen BV, et al (2016). Importance of margin width and reexcision in breast conserving treatment of early breast cancer. J Surg Oncol, 113, 609-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24224
  5. Bosma SC, van der Leij F, van Werkhoven E, et al (2016). Very low local recurrence rates after breast-conserving therapy:analysis of 88485 patients treated over a 28-year period. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 156, 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3732-0
  6. Dixon JM, Thomas J, Kerr GR, et al (2016). A study of margin width and local recurrence in breast conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer. EJSO, 42, 657-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.008
  7. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al (1989). Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 320, 822-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198903303201302
  8. Flemimg FJ, Hill ADK, McDermott EW, et al (2004). Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. EJSO, 30, 233-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2003.11.008
  9. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, Virnig BA, Al-Refaie WB, Tuttle TM (2010). Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol, 28, 3437-41. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6774
  10. Holland R, Veling SHJ, Mravunac M, et al (1985). Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer, 56, 979-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO;2-N
  11. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al (2014). The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 21, 717-30. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5
  12. Irwig L, Bennetts A (1997). Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg, 67, 750-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb04573.x
  13. Isaacs AJ, Gemignani ML, Pusic A, et al (2016). Association of breast conserving surgery for cancer with 90-day reoperation rates in New York State. JAMA Surg, 151, 648-55. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5535
  14. Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van deVelde CJ (1991). The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol, 9, 1059-70. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1991.9.6.1059
  15. Krekel NMA, Haloua MH, Cardozo AMFL, et al (2013). Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpablebreast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 14, 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70527-2
  16. Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth DN Jr, et al (1992). Mastectomy versus breast- conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol, 10, 976-83. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1992.10.6.976
  17. Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, et al (1999). Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol, 25, 461-9.
  18. Merrill AL, Coopey SB, Tang R, et al (2016). Implications of new lumpectomy margin guidelines for breast-conserving surgery: changes in reexcision rates and predicted rates of residual tumor. Ann Sug Oncol, 23, 729-34. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4916-2
  19. Mullenix PS, Cuadrado DG, Steele SR, et al (2004). Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg, 187, 643-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.003
  20. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS (1992). Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 326, 1102-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199204233261702
  21. Neslihan C, Kelly KH, Aysegul AS, et al (2005). Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann of Surg Oncol, 14, 1458-71.
  22. NIH consensus conference (1991). Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA, 2653, 391-5.
  23. Olsha O, Shemesh D, Carmon M, et al (2011). Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol, 18, 447-52. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1280-0
  24. Olson TP, Harter J , Munoz A, et al (2007). Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breastconserving surgery results in low rate of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol, 14, 2953-60. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9437-1
  25. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al (2000). Outcome at 8 years after breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol, 18, 1668-75. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1668
  26. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, et al (1994). The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer, 74, 1746-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1746::AID-CNCR2820740617>3.0.CO;2-Y
  27. Thomas AB, Mark RS, Jennifer JG, et al (2014). Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline. J Clin Oncol, 32, 1502-6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1572
  28. Veronesi U, Volterrani F, Luini A, et al (1990). Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer. Eur J Cancer, 26, 671-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379(90)90114-9