DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Occupational Exposure to Steady Magnetic Fields and its Effect on Workers Blood Indices at an Electrolysis Unit

  • Ravandi, Mohammad Reza Ghotbi (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Science) ;
  • Mardi, Hossein (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Science) ;
  • Khanjani, Narges (Environmental Health Engineering Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Barkhordari, Abolfazl (Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science)
  • Received : 2015.10.13
  • Accepted : 2016.04.05
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

The health effects of environmental and occupational exposure to steady magnetic fields is a matter of concern. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hematologic effects of exposure to steady magnetic fields at the electrolysis unit of a Copper complex. The population under study was the workers of the electrolysis unit of the copper refinery. The average steady magnetic field in the exposure group was 2.5 mT. The blood indices of workers exposure to steady magnetic fields after adjusting for confounders showed decreased white blood cells (except neutrophils) and increase in the number and volume of platelets. Red blood cells did not show any significant difference. Exposure to steady magnetic fields even in proposed safe limits may have hematologic effects on humans. There is a necessity for more research about the safe doses of exposure to magnetic fields.

Keywords

References

  1. International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), Health Phys. 96 (2009).
  2. M. Elferchichi, H. Abdelmelek and M. Sakly, Turk. J. Hematol. 24 (2007).
  3. M. S. Zaghloul, J. Am. Sci. 7, 8 (2011).
  4. World Health Organization, Static fields Geneva: World Health Organization (2006).
  5. A. J. Swerdlow, Report of independent Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation.static magnetic fields. London: Health Protection Agency (2008).
  6. M. Feychting, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 87, 2 (2005).
  7. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati (2011).
  8. R. Hokmabadi and M. Esmaelzadeh Kavaki, Radiation Safety and its Complications. Tehran: Arvij Iranian Publications (2013) pp. 45-56.
  9. S. Derahkshan and M. H. Bagherzadeh, Oncology and Hematology, Hematopoietic Disorders. In: Harrison TR, editor. Principles of Internal Medicine (Translated). Tehran: Hayan (2012) pp. 35-60.
  10. J. L. Marsh and T. J. Armstrong, Am. Indust. Hyg. Asso. J. 43, 6 (1982).
  11. A. Vyalov, Springfield, Virginia: National Technical Information Service Report No JPRS 63033 (1974).
  12. A. Choobineh and F. Amirzadeh, Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med. 9, 2 (2005).
  13. A. Fani, A. Moeini, M. Haidari Bateni, I. Fani, A. Chehrei, and P. Fani, Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences 7, 4 (2005).
  14. A. Salem, A. Hafedh, A. Rached, S. Mohsen, and B. R. Khemais, Pharmacol. Rep. 57 (2005).
  15. D. M. Djordjevich, S. R. De Luka, I. D. Milovanovich, S. Jankovic, S. Stefanovic, S. Veskovic-Moracanin, S. Cirkovic, A. Z. Ilic, J. L. Ristic-Djurovic, and A. M. Trbovich, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 81 (2012).
  16. C. Sihem, A. Hafedh, S. Mohsen, P. J. Marc, and B. R. Khmais, Turk. J. Hematol. 23 (2006).