Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Occupational advice for adults who do stutter and the associated factors

말더듬 성인에 대한 직업 추천 양상과 관련 요인 분석

  • 박홍주 (충남대학교 대학원 언어병리학과) ;
  • 박선영 (충남대학교 대학원 언어병리학과) ;
  • 장혜경 (충남대학교 대학원 언어병리학과) ;
  • 박진 (나사렛대학교)
  • Received : 2016.08.10
  • Accepted : 2016.09.20
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was mainly aimed to investigate on the perceptions of occupational suitability for speakers who stutter and the associated factors. 90 college students who do not stutter participated in this study and asked to hear one of three audio recordings(i.e., fluent version, mildly-stuttered version, and severely-stuttered version) of a male speaker who stuttered. Then, the participants were asked to rate the speaker's communicative functioning, personal attributes, and suitability for 31 occupations, along with perceptions of the occupations' speaking demands and educational requirements. Results show that speakers who stuttered (i.e., mildly-stuttered and severely-stuttered version) received lower suitability ratings for high speaking demand occupations than for low speaking demand occupations. In addition, it has been shown that perceived speaking demand strongly affected occupational suitability ratings at both levels of stuttering severity. However, it has been shown that occupational suitability ratings were not associated with ratings of the speaker's personal attributes and perceived educational requirements. From these findings it can be argued that adults who stutter may face occupational stereotyping and/or role entrapment in work settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. B. (2014). A Comparative study of the Perception of School-age Students Who Stutter between Special Education Teachers and General Education Teachers. Journal of Speech-Language & Hearing Disorders, 23(2), 99-107. (안종복 (2014). 말더듬 학생에 대한 특수교사와 일반교사의 ----인식비교 연구. 언어치료연구, 23(2), 99-107.) https://doi.org/10.15724/jslhd.2014.23.2.009
  2. Bloodstein, O. & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2008). A handbook on stuttering (6th edition). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Craig, A., Blumgart, E., & Tran, Y. (2009). The impact of stuttering on the quality of life in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 34, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.05.002
  5. Davidow, J. H., Bothe, A. K., & Bramlett, R. B. (2006). The stuttering treatment research evaluation and assessment tool (STREAT): Evaluating treatment research as part of evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/013)
  6. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
  7. Gabel, R. M., Hughes, S., & Daniels, D. (2008). Effects of stuttering severity and therapy involvement on role entrapment of people who stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.08.001
  8. Ingham, R. J., Warner, A., Byrd, A., & Cotton, J. (2006) Speech effort measurement and stuttering: investigating the chorus reading effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 9(3), 660-670.
  9. Hayhow, R., Cray, A. M., & Enderby, P. (2002). Stammering and therapy views of people who stammer. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(01)00102-4
  10. Hurst, M. I. & Cooper, E. B. (1983a). Employer attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 8, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(83)90017-7
  11. Hurst, M. I. & Cooper, E. B. (1983b). Vocational rehabilitation counselors' attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 8, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(83)90018-9
  12. Kent, R. D. & Read, W. C. (2002). The acoustic analysis of speech (2nd edition). San Diego, CA: Singular.
  13. Kim, H. H. (1996). Perceptual, Acoustical, and Physiological Tools in Ataxic Dysarthria Management: A case report. Proceedings on the 2nd Conference in The Korean Society of Phonetic Sciences and Speech Technology (pp. 9-22). (김향희 (1996). 운동실조형 마비성 구음장애에 적용되는 지각적, 음향학적, 생리학적 도구에 관하여: 환자사례를 중심으로. 제2회 음성학 학술대회자료집, 9-22.)
  14. Kim, J. S., Chung, H. C., Kim, Y. S., & Cho, Y. R. (2015). A Study on Application of NCS Recruiting Systems in Public Organization: Based on NCS Recruiting Performance During the First Half Year in 2015. Journal of Skills and Qualifications, 4(1), 65-84. (김진실.정형철.김연식.조양래 (2015). NCS를 활용한 채용시스템 운영실태에 관한 연구: 2015년 상반기 공공기관 NCS 채용 성과를 중심으로. 직업과 자격연구, 4(1), 65-84.)
  15. Klein, J. F. & Hood, S. B. (2004). The impact of stuttering on employment opportunities and job performance. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 29, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.08.001
  16. Lee, S. W. (2010). Fluency Disorders. Seoul: Sigma Press. (이승환 (2010). 유창성장애. 서울: 시그마프레스.)
  17. Logan, K. & O'Connor, E. M. (2012). Factors affecting occupational advice for speakers who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37, 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.11.005
  18. Manning, W. H. (1996). Clinical Decisions Making in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Fluency Disorders. Albany, NY: Delmar Publication.
  19. Na, E. M. (2015). NCS Professional Basic Skills and Communication Skills Education at Universities. Proceedings on the 2nd Conference in the Korean Association of General Education (pp. 119-133). (나은미 (2015). NCS의 직업기초능력과 대학에서의 의사소통교육. 한국교양교육학회 학술대회 자료집, 119-133.)
  20. Owens, R. (1996). Language Development: An Introduction (5th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  21. Park, J. & Park, H. Y. (2015). Perceptions of Speech Language Pathologists-in-training Before and After Pseudo-stuttering Experience: Face-to-face Conversation versus Conversation over Telephone. Korean Journal of Education Methodology Studies, 27(4), 535-554. (박진.박희영 (2015). 대면대화상황과 전화대화 상황에 따른 언어치료학 전공학생들의 가짜말더듬효과 비교. 교육방법연구, 27(4), 535-554.)
  22. Park, J., Oh, S., Jun, J. P., & K, J. S. (2015). Effects of background noises on speech-related variables of adults who stutter, Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 7(1), 27-37. (박진.오선영.전제표.강진석 (2015). 배경소음상황에 따른 성인 말더듬화자의 발화 관련 변수 비교. 말소리와 음성과학, 7(1), 27-37.) https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.1.027
  23. Rami, M. K., Kalinowski, J., Rastatter, M. P., Holbert, D., & Allen, M. (2005), "Choral reading with filtered speech: effect on stuttering," Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 421-431. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.100.2.421-431
  24. Riley, G. (1994). The stuttering severity instrument for adults and children (SSI-3) (3rd edition). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
  25. Schlagheck, A., Gabel, R., & Hughes, S. (2009). A mixed methods study of stereotypes of people who stutter. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 36, 108-117.
  26. Shim, H. S. (2000). A study on stereotypes of the Korean male adults who stutter. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders, 5(1), 192-208. (심현섭 (2000), 한국 말더듬 성인에 대한 고정관념 연구. 언어청각장애연구, 5(1), 192-208.)
  27. Shim, H. S., Shin, M. J., & Lee, E. J. (2010). Paradise Fluency Assessment II (P-FA-II). Seoul: Paradise Welfare Foundation. (심현섭.신문자.이은주 (2010). 파라다이스 유창성 검사 II (P-FA-II). 서울: 파라다이스복지재단.)
  28. Swartz, E., Gabel, R., & Irani, F. (2009). Speech-language pathologists' attitudes toward people who stutter. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 33, 99-105.
  29. van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering (2nd edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  30. Woods, C. L. & Williams, D. E. (1976). Traits attributed to stuttering and normally fluent males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19, 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1902.267
  31. Yaruss, J. S. & Quesal, R. W. (2004). Stuttering and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): An update. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00052-2