East Asian Economic Review

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (대외경제정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Should TPP Be Formed? On the Potential Economic, Governance, and Conflict-Reducing Impacts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

  • Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. (University of Notre Dame)
  • Received : 2016.09.02
  • Accepted : 2016.09.29
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a free trade agreement among 12 Pacific Rim countries whose joint gross domestic products (GDPs) account for 36 percent of world GDP and whose mutual trade accounts for approximately 24 percent of world trade. As for most proposed free trade agreements (FTAs), trade economists have provided ex ante computable general equilibrium (CGE) estimates to predict the trade, employment, and real per capita income effects of this agreement, such as ITC (2016). This paper-intended to complement these studies-examines the potential impacts of TPP beyond such traditional CGE estimates, taking a broader economic, governance, and historical perspective. First, we contrast these traditional CGE trade and welfare estimates that treat all firms within an industry as homogeneous with more recent CGE analyses that allow firms' productivities to be heterogeneous. We show that the latter models' trade predictions are much more consistent with ex post empirical evidence of average trade effects of FTAs. Second, empirical evidence now strongly confirms the existence of FTA "contagion." We review this evidence and show that predictive models of the evolution of FTAs indicate that the TPP should be formed. With China now having formed 12 FTAs and negotiating five new ones (including a sixteen member Asia-Pacific FTA), the United States would likely face considerable trade diversion without the TPP. Third, we examine empirical evidence on the likely further economic growth implications of FTAs by reducing firms' uncertainty over trade relations and trade policies. Fourth, we examine empirical evidence on the additional impact of FTAs on consolidating democratic institutions in countries. The TPP would likely help consolidate some of the less mature democracies. Fifth, we examine empirical evidence on the reductions of conflicts (and enhanced peace) between countries owing to the formations of FTAs. We conclude the paper noting that the potential net benefits to member countries of the proposed TPP extend well beyond the real income gains to households based upon traditional CGE models.

Keywords

References

  1. Aitken, N. D. 1973. "The Effect of EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis," American Economic Review, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 881-892.
  2. Anderson, J. 1979. "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation," American Economic Review, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 106-116.
  3. Anderson, J., Bergstrand, J., Egger, P. and J. Francois. 2008. "Non-Tariff Barrier Study Methodology," manuscript.
  4. Anderson, J. E. and E. van Wincoop. 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 170-192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
  5. Arkolakis, C., Costinot, A. and A. Rodriguez-Clare. 2012. "New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?," American Economic Review, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 94-130. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.94
  6. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand. 2004. "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements," Journal of International Economics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 29-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00079-5
  7. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand. 2007. "Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade?," Journal of International Economics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp.72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
  8. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand. 2009. "Estimating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics," Journal of International Economics, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.09.006
  9. Baier, S. L, Bergstrand, J. H. and M. W. Clance. 2015a. Heterogeneous Economic Integration Agreement Effects. CESifo Working Paper, no. 5488. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and the Ifo Institute.
  10. Baier, S. L, Bergstrand, J. H. and M. W. Clance. 2015b. Preliminary Examination of Heterogeneous Effects on International Trade of Economic Integration Agreements. In Dur, A. and M. Elsig. (eds.) Trade Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 355-373.
  11. Baier, S. L, Bergstrand, J. H. and M. W. Clance. 2016. Endogenous Trade-Cost Elasticities, Gravity, and Welfare. Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.
  12. Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., Egger, P. and P. A. McLaughlin. 2008. "Do Economic Integration Agreements Actually Work? Issues in Understanding the Causes and Consequences of the Growth of Regionalism," World Economy, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 461-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01092.x
  13. Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H. and M. Feng. 2014. "Economic Integration Agreements and the Margins of International Trade," Journal of International Economics, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.03.005
  14. Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H. and R. Mariutto. 2014. "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements Revisited: Distinguishing Sources of Interdependence," Review of International Economics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12095
  15. Baldwin, R. E. 1995. A Domino Theory of Regionalism. In Baldwin, R. E., Haaparanta, P., Kiander. (eds.) Expanding Membership in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Baldwin, R. E. 1997. "The Causes of Regionalism," World Economy, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 865-888. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00107
  17. Baldwin, R. and D. Jaimovich. 2012. "Are Free Trade Agreements Contagious?," Journal of International Economics, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.03.009
  18. Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen. 1997. Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion? Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and EFTA. In Ito, T. and A. O. Krueger. (eds.) Regionalism versus Multilateral Arrangements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  19. Berden, K., Francois, J., Tamminen, S., Thelle, M. and P. Wymenga. 2009. Non-Tariff Measures in EU-US Trade and Investment: An Economic Analysis. Rotterdam: Ecorys.
  20. Bergstrand, J. H.1985. "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence," Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 474-481. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976
  21. Bergstrand, J. H. 1989. "The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor Proportions Theory in International Trade," Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 143-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928061
  22. Bergstrand, J. H. 1990. "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-industry Trade," Economic Journal, vol. 100, no. 403, pp. 1216-1229. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233969
  23. Bergstrand, J., Egger, P. and M. Larch. 2016. "Economic Determinants of the Timing of Preferential Trade Agreement Formations and Enlargements," Economic Inquiry, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12241
  24. Chen, M. X. and S. Joshi. 2010. "Third-Country Effects on the Formation of Free Trade Agreements," Journal of International Economics, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.06.003
  25. Ciuriak, D. 2016. The Economics of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Understanding the Alternative Estimates. Policy Brief, Ciuriak Consulting Inc.
  26. Costinot, A. and A. Rodriguez-Clare. 2014. Trade Theory with Numbers. In Gopinath, G., Helpman, E. and K. Rogoff. (eds.) Handbook of International Economics. Volume 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  27. Deardorff, A. V. and R. M. Stern. 1974. "Partial Equilibrium Estimation of the Effects of Trade Liberalization," presented at the Winter Meeting of the Econometric Society, San Francisco, December.
  28. Eaton, J. and S. Kortum. 2002. "Technology, Geography and Trade," Econometrica, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1741-1779. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00352
  29. Egger, P. and M. Larch. 2008. "Interdependent Preferential Trade Agreement Memberships: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of International Economics, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 384-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.08.003
  30. Frankel, J. A. 1997. Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  31. Handley, K. 2014. "Exporting under Trade Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Evidence," Journal of International Economics, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.05.005
  32. Handley, K. and N. Limao. 2013. Policy Uncertainty, Trade and Welfare. NBER Working Paper, no. 19376.
  33. Handley, K. and N. Limao. 2015. "Trade and Investment under Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Firm Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 189-222. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140068
  34. Head, K. and T. Mayer. 2014. Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook. in Gopinath, G., Helpman, E. and K. Rogoff. (eds.) Handbook of International Economics. Volume 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  35. Helpman, E. and P. Krugman. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  36. ITC. 2016. Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission.
  37. Kehoe, T. 2005. An Evaluation of the Performance of Applied General Equilibrium Models of the Impact of NAFTA. In Kehoe, T., Srinivasan, T. N. and J. Whalley. (eds.) Frontiers of Applied General Equilibrium Modeling: In Honor of Herbert Scarf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 341-377.
  38. Kehoe, T. J. and K. J. Ruhl. 2013. "How Important is the New Goods Margin in International Trade?," Journal of Political Economy, vol.121, no. 2, pp. 358-392.
  39. Kim, S. and S. Shikher. 2015. "Long-Run Effects of the Korea-China Free-Trade Agreement," Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 117-142. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2015.19.2.293
  40. Limao, N. 2016. Preferential Trade Agreements. In Bagwell, J. and R. Staiger. (eds.) Handbook of Commercial Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  41. Linnemann, H. 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
  42. Liu, X. and E. Ornelas. 2014. "Free Trade Agreements and the Consolidation of Democracy," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 29-70.
  43. Mansfield, E. D., Milner., H. V. and B. P. Rosendorff. 2000. "Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade," American Political Science Review, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 305-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586014
  44. Martin, P., Mayer, T. and M. Thoenig. 2008a. "Civil Wars and International Trade," Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 6, no.2-3, pp. 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.2-3.541
  45. Martin, P., Mayer, T. and M. Thoenig. 2008b. "Make Trade Not War?," Review of Economic Studies, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 865-900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00492.x
  46. Mayer, T. and M. Thoenig. 2016. Regional Trade Agreements and the Pacification of Eastern Africa. Working Paper. London: International Growth Centre.
  47. Melitz, M. J. 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
  48. Melitz, M. and S. Redding. 2014. Heterogeneous Firms and Trade. In Gopinath, G., Helpman, E. and K. Rogoff. (eds.) Handbook of International Economics.Volume 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  49. Petri, P. and M. Plummer. 2016. The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates. Working Paper 16-2. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  50. Petri, P., Plummer, M. and F. Zhai. 2011. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration. East-West Center Working Papers, Economic Series, no. 119. Honolulu, Hawaii.
  51. Sapir, A. 1981. "Trade Benefits under the EEC Generalized System of Preferences," European Economic Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(81)80006-2
  52. Shoven, J. B. and J. Whalley. 1974. "On the Computation of Competitive Equilibrium," Journal of International Economics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(74)90015-4
  53. Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.
  54. U.S. Congressional Budget Office. 2016. How Preferential Trade Agreements Affect the U.S. Economy, Publication Number 51924.
  55. Zhai, F. 2008. "Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade," Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 575-604. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2008.23.3.575