한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제17권9호
  • /
  • Pages.102-111
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지역혁신체제관점에서의 대전·충청지역 중소기업 혁신성과 결정요인에 관한 실증적 연구

An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Innovation Performance of SMEs in the Daejeon and Chungcheong Region

  • 김영진 (한국화학연구원 정책연구팀) ;
  • 김병근 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학부)
  • Kim, Young-Jin (Policy Research Team, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Kim, Byung-Keun (School of Industrial Mangement, Korea University of Technology and Education)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.13
  • 심사 : 2016.09.09
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 대전충청지역의 지역혁신체제의 특성 및 지역 내 기업 혁신성과 결정요인을 규명하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 분석의 대상지역인 대전충청지역은 대학, 연구소와 같은 연구기반과 대규모의 하이테크 산업단지, 이들 지원하는 혁신지원네트워크를 잘 갖추고 있다. 기존의 지역혁신체제 연구의 한계점을 보완하기 위해서, 기업의 내부적 요인인 내부역량과 외부적 요인으로서 지역혁신역량을 모두 고려하여, 이들이 기업의 혁신성과에 미치는 영향에 대해 분석한다. 기업의 연구개발역량, 마케팅역량, 기업가지향성과 지역혁신역량이 혁신성과에 영향을 미치는 지와 지역혁신역량이 내부역량들과 기업가지향성과 혁신성과의 관계를 조절하는 가를 분석하였다. 실증분석 위해 대전 충청지역 중소기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 시행하여 120개의 설문을 회수 하였으나 부실응답 56개를 제외한 64개의 설문지가 연구 데이터로 사용되었다. 요인분석과 위계적 회귀분석을 활용하여 실증 분석한 결과 기업의 연구개발역량, 마케팅역량, 기업가 지향성으로 측정한 내부역량이 기술혁신성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 기업의 내부역량이 혁신의 가장 중요한 요인임을 주장한 기존의 연구결과를 지지하는 것이다. 그런데 기업가지향성은 혁신적이고 진취적인 기업가 지향성만이 혁신성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 위험감수적 기업가지향성은 혁신성과 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 확인되었다. 지역혁신역량도 기업 혁신성과에 통계적으로 유의하게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 지역혁신역량은 위험감수적 기업가지향성과 혁신성과의 관계를 조절하는 것으로 확인되었다.

This study aims to identify the characteristics of the regional innovation system(RIS) and the determinants of innovation performance of SMEs. Data were collected from a questionnaire survey on 64 SMEs in the Daejeon and Chungcheong regions to uncover the relationship between capabilities, regional innovation capacities and innovation performance. The moderating effects of regional innovation capacities on the relationship between firms' innovation capabilities and performance were also tested. Empirical results revealed that R&D, marketing and entrepreneurial orientation had positive effects. The moderating effect of regional innovation capabilities on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (risk taking) and performance was also confirmed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. P. Cooke, M. G. Uranga, and G. Etxebarria, "Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions", Research Policy, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 475-491, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
  2. P. Cooke, S. Roper, and P. Wylie, "Developing a regional innovation strategy for Northern Ireland", Belfast, Northern Ireland Economic Council, 2002.
  3. M. S. Moon, "Philip Cooke's theory of Regional innovation system", Planning and Policy, pp. 95-103, 2000.
  4. J. D. Kim, "A Study on a regional innovation system by analyzing innovative activities of entrepreneurs", Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 87-110, 2011.
  5. T. K. Sung, "The comparison analysis and policy implication of Innovation system theories", Policy Report, STEPI, pp. 1-101,2005.
  6. M. Buesa, J. Heijs, M. Martinez Pellitero and T. Baumert, "Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case", Technovation, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 463-472, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.007
  7. M. Buesa, J. Heijs and T. Baumert, "The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach", Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 722-735, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.016
  8. J. Heijs, "Sistemas nacionales y regionals de innovacion y politica tecnologica: una aproximacion teorica", 2001.
  9. J. H. Kim, "An Empirical Analysis between Regional Innovative Capabilities and Regional Industrial Performances in Korea", The Korean Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 99-121, 2003.
  10. K. K. Chun, C. S. Suh and J. J. Lee, "A Study on the Empirical Analysis of Regional Innovation Structure and the Construction of Regional Innovation System of Daegu-Gyeongbuk Region", Journal of Korea Planning Association, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 131-146, 2003.
  11. Y. S. Oh, J. S. Choi and J. S. Kim, "An Empirical Study on the Regional Innovation Capacity in Korea", The Korea Local Administration Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 127-152, 2005.
  12. I. S. Jang, "Economic effects of Regional innovation system". Seoul Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19-39, 2007.
  13. B. K. Kim, K. Y. Om and H. Y. Ryu, "Regional Innovation Capabilities and Firms-Technological Innovation Activities in Chungnam Province of South Korea", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 265-289, 2009.
  14. P. Cooke, M. G., Uranga and G. Etxebarria, "Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective". Environment and Planning, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1563-1584, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a301563
  15. T. K., Das and Teng, B. S., "Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances", Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 491-512, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259291
  16. R. Yam, J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun and E. P Tang, "An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing", China, Research Policy, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1123-1140, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  17. V. Souitaris. "Firm-specific competencies determining technological innovation : A survey in Greece", R&D Management, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 61-77, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00239
  18. L. A. Hall and S. Bagchi-Sen, "A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry", Technovation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 231-244, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00016-5
  19. D. W. Vorhies and N. A. Morgan, "Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage", Journal of Marketing, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 80-94, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.1.80.55505
  20. S. A. Zahra and D. M., Garvis, "International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility", Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 469-492, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00036-1
  21. C. Lee, K. Lee and J. M. Pennings, "Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 67, pp. 615-640, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.181
  22. J. Wiklund, and D. Shepherd, "Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach", Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71-91, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
  23. T. Tura and V. Harmaakorpi, "Social capital in building regional innovative capability", Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1111-1125, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400500328255
  24. K. C. Yoon, "A Study on the Factors Influenced on the Performance of Korean Ventures-Focusing on International Entrepreneurship and Firm's Capabilities", Journal of International Area Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 445-474, 2009.
  25. D. S. Yoon and K. Y. Hwang, "The Antecedents of R&D Capability and Performance on Venture Firms". Advancing Small Enterprise Innovation Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55-77, 2007.
  26. C. K. Prahalad, and G. Hamel, "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard Business Review, Vol1990 no. May-June, pp. 235-256, 1990.
  27. J. Weerawardena, "Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy", European Journal of Marketing Vol 37. no. 3/4, pp. 407-429, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560310459023
  28. J. G. Covin and D. P Slevin, "Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments", Strategic Management journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75-87, 1989. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
  29. H. D. Yoon and R. B. Seo, "A Study of the Core Factors Affecting the Performance of Technology Management of Inno-Biz SMEs", Journal of Technology Innovation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 111-144, 2011.
  30. K. Laursen and A. Salter, "Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 131-150, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  31. J. M. Na, "Empirical Analysis between Regional Innovation Capabilities and Technology Development Performances: The Case of Manufacturing Industries", The Journal of Regional Development Studies, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 51-67, 2006.
  32. R. R. Nelson and N. Rosenberg, "Technical Innovation and National Systems", R. R. Nelson (ed.), National Systems of Innovation-Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  33. Y. J. Kim, "A Study on the Determinants of Innovation Performance of Korean SMEs in the Daejeon and Chungcheong Provinces", The 52 thautumn conference, Seoul:KOSIME, 2015.