DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Windbreak Planting on Crop Productivity for Agroforestry Practices in a Semi-Arid Region

  • Jo, Hyun-Kil (Department of Ecological Landscape Architecture Design, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Hye-Mi (Department of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2017.10.25
  • Accepted : 2017.11.16
  • Published : 2017.11.30

Abstract

Agroforestry has been practiced in arid and semi-arid regions for the purposes of preventing desertification and to increase income for locals. However, the intended effects of such practices have been limited due to strong winds and aridity. This study undertook multi-year monitoring of the productivity of income crops associated with windbreak planting in a semi-arid region of Mongolia, and explored strategies of windbreak planning to enhance the multi-purpose effects of agroforestry practices. The tree crown density of windbreak planting was on average 40% in one year after planting and 65% 2-3 years after, and thereby windspeeds were reduced by about 30% and 54%, respectively. Average windspeed reductions at leeward distances from the windbreak planting were approximately 60% within 3H (H=tree height), 50% at 5H, and 42% at 7-9H, presenting a pattern in which the farther the distance the less the reduction in windspeeds. The windbreak planting increased crop productivity by up to 6.8 times, compared to the productivity absent of windbreaks. Increases in the crown density as stated above resulted in increases of crop productivity by up to 3.6 times. Based on such results, this study proposed a model of windbreak planning as a typical land-use system of border windbreak planting or alternate windbreak planting of combining trees and income crops. The model also included tree planting with a crown density of 60% and allocation of income crops within a leeward distance of 5 times the height of the trees to reduce windspeeds by about 50%. The results from this study are applicable to practicing agroforestry not only at the study site but also in other regions worldwide where strong winds and aridity are problematic.

Keywords

References

  1. Campi A, Palumbo AD, Mastrorilli M. 2009. Effects of tree windbreak on microclimate and wheat productivity in a Mediterranean environment. Eur J Agron 30: 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.10.004
  2. Finch SJ. 1988. Field windbreaks: design criteria. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22-23: 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90020-5
  3. Grey GW, Deneke FJ. 1986. Urban Forestry. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  4. KEI (Korea Environment Institute). 2003. Analyzing Northeast Asian Dust and Sandstorm Damages and Regional Cooperation Strategies I. Seoul. (in Korean)
  5. KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute). 2004. Cause and Mitigation of Desertification in Northeast Asian Regions. Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul. (in Korean)
  6. Kort J. 1988. Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22-23: 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90017-5
  7. Lee KG, Lee MH, Cho H. 2012. Development of sea buckthorn beer using Mongolian sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) fruit. Food Eng Prog 16: 129-133. (in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Miller RW. 2015. Urban Forestry. 3th ed. Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.
  9. MOE (Ministry of Environment). 2008. A Study on Current Status and Mitigation Measures of Yellow Dust Outbreak in Mongolia. Ministry of Environment, Seoul. (in Korean)
  10. MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs). 2011. Overview of Mongolia. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Seoul. (in Korean)
  11. Park KH, Ding GD, Fang GL, Kim CB, Wu B, Bao YF, Gao GL, Jung SC, Moon KM. 2012. Comparative analysis of windbreak effect and installation cost of sand barrier with different height and porosity on sand land in China. J Korean Env Res Technol 15: 29-41. (in Korean with English abstract)
  12. Reynolds JF. 2013. Desertification. In: Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (Levin SA, ed). Academic press, San Diego, pp 479-494.
  13. Robinette GO. 1972. Plants, People and Environmental Quality. USDI National Park Service, Washington, D.C.
  14. Shapo H, Adam H. 2008. Modification of microclimate and associated food crop productivity in an alley-cropping system in Northern Sudan. In: Toward Agroforestry Design: An Ecological Approach (Jose S, Gordon AM, eds). Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, pp 97-109.
  15. Tungalag R, Jamsran T, Boldgiv B, Lkhagvasuren D. 2012. A Field Guide to the Trees and Shrubs of Mongolia. Munkhiin Useg, Ulaanbaatar.
  16. Ulziijargal D. 2011. Survival rate and growth characteristics of plantation species by planting methods of desertified-area in Mongolia. MS thesis. Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. (in Korean)
  17. UNCCD (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification). 2012. Desertification: A Visual Synthesis. Zoi Environment Network, Bresson.
  18. UNDDD (United Nations Decade for Deserts and the Fight Against Desertification). Desertification. 2010.
  19. USDA NAC (USDA National Agroforestry Center). 2002. Windbreaks: An Agroforestry Practice. Lincoln, Nebraska.