DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility Study of Environmental Impact Assessment as Instrument for Alternative Dispute Resolutions - Case Study: Environmental Conflicts of Mungjangdae Hot Spring Resort Development -

대체적 분쟁해결 방안으로서 환경영향평가 적용가능성 - 문장대 온천 조성사업 환경갈등 사례연구 -

  • Hong, Sang-Pyo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Cheongju University)
  • 홍상표 (청주대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2017.09.01
  • Accepted : 2017.11.15
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The regional environmental conflicts of 'Mungjangdae Hot Spring Development Project' have still now continued from 1985. As a case study, the limitation of environmental litigation and the feasibility of EIA as Alternative Dispute Resolutions (ADR) for solving the conflict of 'Mungjangdae Hot Spring Development Project' was analysed. In order to mitigate environmental and social conflicts, the scope and time of public participation in EIA process which is democratic procedure based on scientific prediction of environmental impact need to be diversified to the extent 'Aarhus Convention', and the burden of environmental litigation need to be alleviated by the 'EIA consultation' from environmental authorities. In decision-making process related with large scale development plan and project which have enormous impact, the effectiveness of the EIA as ADR can be enhanced by applying citizen involvement in environmental governance and the various aspects of sustainability. The effective utilization of EIA public participation such as public hearing to pursue social equity can be a ESSD scheme for the implementation of SDG at regional dimension in Korea.

1985년에 온천관광지 조성계획이 추진되었으나 2017년 현재까지도 지역간 환경갈등이 지속되고 있는 '문장대 온천 관광지 조성사업' EIA의 사례연구를 통하여 환경소송의 한계와 ADR로서 EIA 제도의 적용가능성에 대하여 고찰하였다. 환경영향의 과학적 사전예측으로 사회갈등 환경갈등을 예방하기 위한 민주적 절차인 EIA 제도를 통하여 지역주민 의견수렴 및 'EIA 협의의견'을 환경 거버넌스 차원에서 의사결정 과정에 반영하면 환경소송의 폐해를 미연에 방지하게 되어 ADR로 기능할 수 있다. 우리나라에서도 EIA 주민참여 범위를 'Aarhus 협약' 수준으로 확대된 공중의견 수렴제도를 점진적으로 도입하여 실질적인 ADR 기능을 강화시킬 수 있다. 막대한 영향을 미치는 개발계획 및 개발사업에 관련된 의사결정 과정에 공청회 등의 거버넌스를 통하여 사회적 형평성 및 환경적 지속가능성을 핵심으로 하는 EIA 제도는 궁극적으로는 우리나라의 지역차원에서 SDG를 구현시킬 수 있는 적합한 ESSD 수단이 될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho HS. 2006. Economics of Alternative Dispute Resolution : Focused on the Assessment of Environmental Dispute Adjustment. Comparative Private Law. 13(1): 90. [Korean Literature]
  2. Constitutional Court of Korea. 2008. Constitutional Appeal on Article2 in Hot Spring Act. 2004 Heon-Ba 44. [Korean Literature]
  3. Daegu High Court. 2003. Case 2001 Nu 1759 Revocation of Enforcement Sanction on Hot Spring Tourism District Development Project. [Korean Literature]
  4. Daegu High Court. 2009. Case 2006 Nu 2092 Revocation of Enforcement Sanction on Hot Spring Tourism District Development Project. [Korean Literature]
  5. Hammond E, Markell DL. 2013. Administrative Proxies for Judicial Review : Building Legitimacy from the Inside-out. Harvard Environmental Law Review. 37: 313-320.
  6. Han AR. 2016. A Study on Environmental Conflict and Environmental Impact Assessment : Yesan New Material General Industrial Complex, Donghwa Incinerator. Master Dissertation. Graduate School of Public Administration. Seoul National University; p.2. [Korean Literature]
  7. Hong JH. 2010. Legal Issues in Administrative Litigations on Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea. Administrative Law Research. Korea Administrative Law Institute. 28 : 209-230. [Korean Literature]
  8. Hong JH. 2013. Special Lectures on Environmental Laws. Pakyoungsa; p.20-21. [Korean Literature]
  9. Hong SP. 2011. A Study on the Implication of Sustainability and Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 20(3) : 269-279. [Korean Literature]
  10. Hong SP. 2016. Implication Measures between Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development Indicators. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25(1): 63-76. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.1.63
  11. Jeong HS. 2008. Environmental Change, Human Civilization and Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Studies. Graduate School of Environmental Studies. Seoul National University. 47: 19-20. [Korean Literature]
  12. Kang SR. 1997. A Study on Implementation of Korean Environmental Impact Assessment. Ph.D. Dissertation. Kyunghee University; p.135-145. [Korean Literature]
  13. Kim BM. 2016. A Study on the Operation Mechanism of Environmental Impact Assessment System : with a Focus on the Effects of Conflict Prevention and Management. Master Dissertation. Sungkyunkwan University; p.43 [Korean Literature]
  14. Kim EJ. 2015. The Role of the Judiciary in Settlement of Environmental Disputes : Focused on the Legal Analysis of the Significant Supreme Court Cases. Dispute Resolution Studies Review. Dankook Center for Dispute Resolution. 13(3): 5-28. [Korean Literature]
  15. Kim SC. 2010. The Civil Remedies for the Environmental Invasions. Ph.D. Dissertation. Andong National University; p. 119-121. [Korean Literature]
  16. Kim SW. 2012. Meta-evaluation on Environmental Impact Assessment. National Assembly of Budget Office; p. 54. [Korean Literature]
  17. Kim TH, Shin YG. 2000. Comparative Studies on the Physico-chemical Characteristics and Structure of Phytoplankton and Periphyton Communities in the Shinwol Stream and the Seokmoondong Stream. Environmental Science Review. Sangji University. 6(1) : 1-12. [Korean Literature]
  18. Kwon KT. 2012. A Study on the Groundwater Use and Development from a International Legal Point of View. Master Dissertation. Korea University; p.101-102. [Korean Literature]
  19. Lawrence DP. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment : Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems. John Wiley & Sons; p.355-364.
  20. Lee JU. 2006. A Study on the Resolution of Environmental Conflicts. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dongguk University; p.226. [Korean Literature]
  21. Lee YJ, Moon NK, Ha JS, Lee MJ, Kim KH, Park JH. 2017. Korea's Environmental Assessment Strategies for Sustainable Society. Korea Environment Institute; p.15. [Korean Literature]
  22. Lee YS, Choi JK, Cho GJ, Han SW, Lee YS. 2012. Improvement of Environmental Impact Assessment Regime to Reduce Environmental Conflict-Approach through Lawsuit Case Analysis. Korea Environment Institute; p.91. [Korean Literature]
  23. Lee YS, Lee YS. 2012. Major Issues and Improvement Direction of Administrative Litigations Related with Environmental Impact Assessment. Environment Forum.; Korea Environment Institute. 16(5): 1-12. [Korean Literature]
  24. Lim JH. 2016. A Study on the Causes and Characteristics of Environmental Conflicts in South Korea. Dispute Resolution Studies Review. Dankook Center for Dispute Resolution. Dankook University. 14(2): 109-136. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.16958/drsr.2016.14.2.109
  25. Lim SS. 1997. A Case Study of Regional Conflict: Focused on Mungjangdae.Yongwha Hot Spring Resort Development. Master Dissertation. Kookmin University. [Korean Literature]
  26. Park CS. 2013. A Study on the Advanced Prevention Program in Environmental Dispute-Focused on the Punitive Damages-. Hanyang Law Review. Hanyang Law Association. 24(2): 208. [Korean Literature]
  27. Promotion Committee for Deterrence on Mungjangdae.Yongwha Hot Spring Resort Development. 2003. A White Book (the Last Volume): Deterrence on Mungjangdae.Yongwha Hot Spring Resort Development; p.861-914. [Korean Literature]
  28. Ryu BR, Cho HK. 2013. A Study on the Role of Environmental Impact Assessment in Resolving Environmental Conflicts : With a Focus on Information Dynamics. Korean Public Administration. 25(3): 847-877. [Korean Literature]
  29. Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP. 2017. Reconceptualizing Public Participation in Environmental Assessment as EA Civics. Environmental Impact Assesment Review. 62: 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.009
  30. Song JB. 2013. A Study on the Expansion of Standing in Environmental Administrative Lawsuits and introduction of Verbandsklage and Class Action. Master Dissertation. Yonsei University; p.42. [Korean Literature]
  31. Supreme Court. 2001. Declaration 99 Da 53001 Adjudication. Revocation of Enforcement Sanction on Hot Spring Tourism District Development Project. [Korean Literature]
  32. Supreme Court. 2006. Declaration 2006 Du 330 Adjudication. Revocation of Enforcement Sanction on Hot Spring Tourism District Development Project. [Korean Literature]
  33. Supreme Court. 2009. Declaration 2009 Du 10673 Adjudication. Revocation of Enforcement Sanction on Hot Spring Tourism District Development Project. [Korean Literature]
  34. Tromans S. 2012. Environmental Impact Assessment. Bloomsbury Professional Ltd; p.29-33.
  35. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2016. Environmental Courts & Tribunals - A Guide for Policy Makers; p.47.
  36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2001. Stakeholder Involvement and Public Participation at the US EPA : Lessons Learned, Barriers and Innovative Approaches.
  37. Ye KH, Hong YH. 1997. The Control of Local Governments Conflicts in the Regional Development: Focused on Mungjangdae. Yonghwa Hot Spring Resort Development. 11(1): 131-159. [Korean Literature]
  38. Youn OS. 2004. A Study on Conflict Management in National Physical Development Process : Focusing on 4th National Comprehensive Territorial Plan. Ph.D. Dissertation. Kyungwon University; p. 240-243. [Korean Literature]
  39. Yun SJ. 2004. Suggestions for the Improvement of Environmental Impact Assessment to Prevent, Mitigate and Resolve Environmental Conflicts: Focused on the Institutionalization of Citizen-Involved Social Impact Assessment. Korean Society and Public Administration. Seoul Association for Public Administration. 15(1): 283-311. [Korean Literature]