Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of available energy and total tract digestibility of acid-hydrolyzed ether extract of cottonseed oil for growing pigs by the difference and regression methods

  • Zhao, Jinbiao (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, Zhongchao (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Lyu, Mingbin (New Hope Liuhe Co., Ltd) ;
  • Liu, Ling (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Piao, Xiangshu (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, Defa (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2016.07.16
  • Accepted : 2016.09.18
  • Published : 2017.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of inclusion level on the digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and total tract digestibility of acid-hydrolyzed ether extract (AEE) of cottonseed oil when fed to growing pigs. Methods: Forty-two barrows (initial body weight = $35.51{\pm}2.01kg$) were randomly allotted to a completely randomized design with a corn-soybean meal basal diet, five levels of cottonseed oil (2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%) and a 10% soybean oil diet. Each diet was replicated six times with one pig per replicate. The experiment lasted 19 days, 7 d for cage adaptation, 7 d for diets adaptation and last 5 d for feces and urine collection. The energy values and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of cottonseed oil and soybean oil were calculated by the difference method, and regression equations were established to predict the energy values of cottonseed oil. The apparent digested fat of the entire intestinal tract was also regressed against dietary fat intake to determine the true total tract digestibility (TTTD) and endogenous loss of fat for cottonseed oil. Results: The results showed that the DE and ME contents of cottonseed oil were not different as the inclusion level increased. The DE and ME values determined by the regression equation were 36.28 MJ/kg and 34.96 MJ/kg, respectively, and the values were similar to the mean DE and ME values calculated by the difference method (36.18 and 35.56 MJ/kg, respectively). The ATTD of cottonseed oil was also not affected by the inclusion level of cottonseed oil, and the TTTD and EFL determined by the regression method were 92.40% and 13.83 g/kg of dry matter intake for corn-soybean basal diet. The DE, ME, and ATTD of AEE in soybean oil determined by the difference method were 35.70 MJ/kg, 35.20 MJ/kg and 92.31%, respectively. There were no differences in the DE, ME, and ATTD between cottonseed oil and soybean oil, although the ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids for soybean oil was higher than for cottonseed oil. Conclusion: The DE, ME, and ATTD values of cottonseed oil were not affected by its dietary inclusion level. The energy values of cottonseed oil determined by the difference and regression methods were similar. Furthermore, the ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acid for oils was not the decisive factor to influence the energy values and ATTD of oils.

Keywords

References

  1. Jones DB, Hancock JD, Harmon DL. Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources on nutrient digestibility, serum lipids, and growth performance in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 1992;70:3473-82. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113473x
  2. Powles J, Wiseman J, Cole DJA, Jagger S. Prediction of the apparent digestible energy value of fats given to pigs. Anim Sci 1995;61:149-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800013631
  3. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
  4. Su YB, Liu L, Piao XS, Li DF. The effect of inclusion level and basal diet on the determination of the digestible and metabolizable energy content of soybean oil and its digestibility when fed to growing pigs. Anim Prod Sci 2016;56:1167-73. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14638
  5. Li S, Sauer WC. The effect of dietary fat content on amino acid digestibility in young pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:1737-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7271737x
  6. Jorgensen H, Fernandez JA. Chemical composition and energy value of different fat sources for growing pigs. Acta Agric Scand Section A, Anim Sci 2000;50:129-36.
  7. Albin DM, Smiricky MR, Wubben JE, Gabert VM. The effect of dietary level of soybean oil and palm oil on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and postprandial flow patterns of chromic oxide and amino acid in pigs. Can J Anim Sci 2001;81:495-503. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-104
  8. Cervantes-Pahm SK, Stein HH. Effect of dietary soybean oil and soybean protein concentration on the concentration of digestible amino acids in soybean products fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2008;86:2382-92.
  9. Wiseman J, Cole D, Hardy B. The dietary energy values of soyabean oil, tallow and their blends for growing/finishing. Anim Prod 1990;50:573-82.
  10. Powles J, Wiseman J, Cole DJA, Hardy B. Effect of chemical structure of fats upon their apparent digestible energy value when given to growing/finishing pigs. Anim Prod 1993; 57:137-46.
  11. Baidoo SK, Clowes EJ, Aherne FX. The digestible energy value of canola oil for growing pigs as measured by level of inclusion. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996; 62:111-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(96)00994-7
  12. Villamide MJ. Methods of energy evaluation of feed ingredients for rabbits and their accuracy. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;57:211-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00855-1
  13. Kil DY, Sauber TE, Jones DB, Stein HH. Effect of the form of dietary fat and the concentration of dietary NDF on ileal and total tract endogenous losses and apparent and true digestibility of fat by growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2010;88:2959-67. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2216
  14. Kim BG, Kil DY, Stein HH. In growing pigs, the true ileal and total tract digestibility of acid hydrolyzed ether extraction in extracted corn oil is greater than in intact sources of corn oil or soybean oil. J Anim Sci 2013;91:755-63. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4777
  15. Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:917-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02
  16. Adeola O. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In Swine Nutrition. 2nd. New York: CRC Press; 2001. p. 903-16.
  17. Widmer MR, MoGinnis LM, Stein HH. Energy, phosphorus, and amino acid digestibility of high-protein distillers dried grains and corn germ fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2007;85:2994-3003. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-840
  18. Adeola O, Mahan DC, Azain MJ. Dietary lipid sources and levels for weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:4216-25. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6297
  19. Wiseman J, Cole D. The digestible and metabolizable energy of two fat blends for growing pigs as influenced by level of inclusion. Anim Prod 1987;50:573-82.
  20. Noblet J, Perez JM. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. J Anim Sci 1993;71:3389-98. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x
  21. Adams KL, Jensen AH. Comparative utilization of in-seed fats and the respective extracted fats by the young pig. J Anim Sci 1984;59:1557-66. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5961557x
  22. Jorgensen H, Jakobsen K, Eggum BO. Determination of endogenous fat and fatty acids at the terminal ileum and on faeces in growing pigs. Acta Agric Scand Section A, Anim Sci 1993;43:101-6.
  23. Bach KK, Hansen I. Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions. Microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Br J Nutr 1991;65:233-48. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19910083
  24. Yan H, Potu R, Lu H. Dietary fat content and fiber type modulate hindgut microbial community and metabolic markers in the pig. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e59581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059581
  25. Freeman CP, Holme DW, Annison EF. The determination of the true digestibilities of interesterified fats in young pigs. Br J Nutr 1968;22:651-60. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19680076
  26. Juste C, Demarne Y, Corring T. Response of bile flow, biliary lipids and bile acid pool in the pig to quantitative variations in dietary fat. J Nutr 1983;113:1691-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/113.9.1691
  27. Kil DY, Ji F, Stewart LL, et al. Net energy of soybean oil and choice white grease in diets fed to growing and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2011;89:448-59. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3233
  28. Lauridsen C, Christensen TB, Halekoh U. Alternative fat sources to animal fat for pigs. Lipid Technol 2007;19:156-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lite.200700051
  29. Mateos GG. Sell JL, Eastwood JA. Rate of food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat. Poult Sci 1982;61:94-100. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0610094
  30. Kerr BJ, Weber TE, Dozier III WA, Kidd MT. Digestible and metabolizable energy content of crude glycerin originating from different sources in nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 2009;87:4042-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1676

Cited by

  1. Effects of dietary fiber content and different fiber-rich ingredients on endogenous loss of fat and fatty acids in growing pigs vol.10, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0348-3