DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Patterns and Prognostic Significance of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis and the Efficacy of Cervical Node Dissection in Esophageal Cancer

  • Kang, Yoonjin (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hwang, Yoohwa (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Ju (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, In Kyu (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young Tae (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Chang Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.12.21
  • Accepted : 2017.06.26
  • Published : 2017.10.05

Abstract

Background: The clinical value of 3-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to identify the patterns and prognostic significance of cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in ESCC. Methods: A retrospective review of 77 patients with E SCC who underwent esophagectomy and 3FLND between 2002 and 2016 was conducted. For each cervical node level, the efficacy index (EI), overall survival, recurrence rate, and complication rate were compared. Results: CLNM was identified in 34 patients (44.2%) who underwent 3FLND. Patients with CLNM had a significantly lower overall survival rate (22.7% vs. 58.2%) and a higher recurrence rate (45.9% vs. 16.3%) than patients without CLNM. CLNM was an independent predictor of recurrence in ESCC patients. Moreover, in patients with pathologic N3 tumors, the odds ratio of CLNM was 10.8 (95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 57.5; p=0.005). Level IV dissection had the highest EI, and level IV metastasis was significantly correlated with overall survival (p=0.012) and recurrence (p=0.001). Conclusion: CLNM was a significant prognostic factor for ESCC patients and was more common among patients with advanced nodal stages. Level IV exhibited the highest risk of metastasis, and dissection at level IV may be crucial when performing 3FLND, especially in advanced nodal stage disease.

Keywords

References

  1. Daly JM, Karnell LH, Menck HR. National Cancer Data Base report on esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 1996;78:1820-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961015)78:8<1820::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-Z
  2. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Dhar DK, Nagasue N. Extended esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. Arch Surg 2003;138:1383-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1383
  3. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1994;220:364-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199409000-00012
  4. Ma GW, Situ DR, Ma QL, et al. Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a metaanalysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:18022-30. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022
  5. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, et al. Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer: comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 1995;222:654-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199511000-00008
  6. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, et al. Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 2005;189:98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.10.001
  7. Ye T, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Chen H. Three-field or two-field resection for thoracic esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1933-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.050
  8. Tabira Y, Yasunaga M, Tanaka M, et al. Recurrent nerve nodal involvement is associated with cervical nodal metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:232-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00348-3
  9. Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, et al. Efficacy of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus 2016;13:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-015-0515-3
  10. Udagawa H, Ueno M, Shinohara H, et al. The importance of grouping of lymph node stations and rationale of three-field lymphoadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2012;106:742-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23122
  11. Jang HJ, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, Zo JI. Patterns of lymph node metastasis and survival for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1091-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.093
  12. Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1112088
  13. Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1995;82:346-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820321
  14. Gockel I, Sgourakis G, Lyros O, Hansen T, Lang H. Dissection of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011;11:571-8. https://doi.org/10.1586/era.10.157
  15. Robbins KT, Shaha AR, Medina JE, et al. Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:536-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.5.536
  16. Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K. Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 1991;48:411-20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000226971
  17. Okuma T, Kaneko H, Yoshioka M, Torigoe Y, Miyauchi Y. Prognosis in esophageal carcinoma with cervical lymph node metastases. Surgery 1993;114:513-8.
  18. Sato F, Shimada Y, Li Z, et al. Paratracheal lymph node metastasis is associated with cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1245/aso.2002.9.1.65
  19. Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 2002;236:177-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200208000-00005
  20. Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 2004;240:962-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000145925.70409.d7
  21. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, et al. Lymph node metastasis and recurrence in patients with a carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field dissection. World J Surg 1994;18:266-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294412
  22. Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H. Improved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection. Ann Surg 2004;239:483-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000118562.97742.29
  23. Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, et al. Lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1991;48:106-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930480207
  24. Kato H, Tachimori Y, Watanabe H, Igaki H, Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A. Recurrent esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection. J Surg Oncol 1996;61:267-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199604)61:4<267::AID-JSO6>3.0.CO;2-8
  25. Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Makino T, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 2015;112:60-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23965
  26. Ferlito A, Robbins KT, Shah JP, et al. Proposal for a rational classification of neck dissections. Head Neck 2011;33:445-50.
  27. Shiozaki H, Yano M, Tsujinaka T, et al. Lymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2001;14:191-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00206.x
  28. Takeuchi H. Sentinel node navigation for esophageal cancer. Kyobu Geka 2007;60(8 Suppl):776-81.
  29. Yoshioka S, Fujiwara Y, Sugita Y, et al. Real-time rapid reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for intraoperative diagnosis of lymph node micrometastasis: clinical application for cervical lymph node dissection in esophageal cancers. Surgery 2002;132:34-40. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2002.125306
  30. Baba M, Aikou T, Yoshinaka H, et al. Long-term results of subtotal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1994;219:310-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199403000-00012
  31. Baba M, Natsugoe S, Shimada M, et al. Does hoarseness of voice from recurrent nerve paralysis after esophagectomy for carcinoma influence patient quality of life? J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:231-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00295-6
  32. Kinugasa S, Tachibana M, Yoshimura H, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse shortand long-term outcomes after extended esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol 2004;88:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20137
  33. Derogar M, Sadr-Azodi O, Johar A, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Hospital and surgeon volume in relation to survival after esophageal cancer surgery in a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:551-7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.46.1517
  34. Dimick JB, Goodney PP, Orringer MB, Birkmeyer JD. Specialty training and mortality after esophageal cancer resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:282-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.01.044

Cited by

  1. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS vol.30, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy498