DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Femoro-Supragenicular Popliteal Bypass with a Bridging Stent Graft in a Diffusely Diseased Distal Target Popliteal Artery: Alternative to Below-Knee Popliteal Polytetrafluoroethylene Bypass

  • Byun, Joung Hun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Tae Gyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Yun Gyu (Department of Radiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.01.02
  • Accepted : 2017.05.09
  • Published : 2017.10.05

Abstract

Background: Lesions in distal target arteries hinder surgical bypass procedures in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Methods: Between April 2012 and October 2015, 16 patients (18 limbs) with lifestyle-limiting claudication (n=12) or chronic critical limb ischemia (n=6) underwent femoral-above-knee (AK) polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass grafts with a bridging stent graft placement between the distal target popliteal artery and the PTFE graft. Ring-supported PTFE grafts were used in all patients with no available vein for graft material. Follow-up evaluations assessed clinical symptoms, the ankle-brachial index, ultrasonographic imaging and/or computed tomography angiography, the primary patency rate, and complications. Results: All procedures were successful. The mean follow-up was 12.6 months (range, 11 to 14 months), and there were no major complications. The median baseline ankle-brachial index of 0.4 (range, 0.2 to 0.55) significantly increased to 0.8 (range, 0.5 to 1.0) at 12 months (p<0.01). The primary patency rate at 12 months was 83.3%. The presenting symptoms resolved within 2 weeks. Conclusion: In AK bypasses with a diffusely diseased distal target popliteal artery or when below-knee (BK) bypass surgery is impossible, this procedure could be clinically effective and safe when used as an alternative to femoral-BK bypass surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Brewster DC, LaSalle AJ, Darling RC. Comparison of above-knee and below-knee anastomosis in femoropopliteal bypass grafts. Arch Surg 1981;116:1013-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380200023004
  2. Klinkert P, Post PN, Breslau PJ, van Bockel JH. Saphenous vein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass: a review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;27:357-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.027
  3. Kim HY, Kim JS, Kim MY, Hwang SW, Yoo BH. Comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts for above the knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;43:127-32. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2010.43.2.127
  4. Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Prego AA, Ucelay-Gomez R, et al. Long-term results of infrainguinal revascularization with polytetrafluoroethylene: a ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:209-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(92)90109-L
  5. Baumann F, Do DD, Willenberg T, Baumgartner I, Diehm N. Treatment for long-segment femoro-popliteal obstructions: initial experience with a 4-F compatible self-expanding nitinol stent and review of the literature. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2012;53:475-80.
  6. Szendro G, Greenberg G, Leytzin A, Mayzler O, Ginzburg V. A new minimally invasive hybrid technique for femoro-above knee popliteal bypass. Int Angiol 2011;30:522-6.
  7. Greenberg G, Szendro G, Mayzler O, Ginzburg V, Leytzin A. Use of ViaBahn open revascularisation technique for above-knee femoro-popliteal anastomosis: a technical note. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;42:202-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.03.024
  8. Ferretto L, Piazza M, Bonvini S, Battocchio P, Grego F, Ricotta JJ. ViPS (Viabahn Padova Sutureless) technique: preliminary results in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2012;26:34-9.
  9. Albers M, Battistella VM, Romiti M, Rodrigues AA, Pereira CA. Meta-analysis of polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts to infrapopliteal arteries. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:1263-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(02)75332-9
  10. Pereira CE, Albers M, Romiti M, Brochado-Neto FC, Pereira CA. Meta-analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity arterial insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:510-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.054
  11. Ranke C, Rieder M, Creutzig A, Alexander K. A nomogram of duplex ultrasound quantification of peripheral arterial stenoses: studies of the cardiovascular model and in angiography patients. Med Klin (Munich) 1995;90:72-7.
  12. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:517-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4
  13. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Verbist J, et al. Heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft for femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypass grafting: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:313-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.037
  14. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:104-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(86)90073-X
  15. Goltz JP, Ritter CO, Kellersmann R, Klein D, Hahn D, Kickuth R. Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery segments P1 and P2 in patients with critical limb ischemia: initial experience using a helical nitinol stent with increased radial force. J Endovasc Ther 2012;19:450-6. https://doi.org/10.1583/11-3591MR.1
  16. Kroger K, Santosa F, Goyen M. Biomechanical incompatibility of popliteal stent placement. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11:686-94. https://doi.org/10.1583/04-127.1
  17. Ruckert RI, Tsilimparis N, Lobenstein B, Witte J, Seip G, Storck M. Midterm results of a precuffed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft for above knee femoropopliteal bypass in a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:1203-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.097
  18. Solakovic E, Totic D, Solakovic S. Femoro-popliteal bypass above knee with saphenous vein vs synthetic graft. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2008;8:367-72. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2008.2899
  19. Davies MG, Saad WE, Peden EK, Mohiuddin IT, Naoum JJ, Lumsden AB. Impact of runoff on superficial femoral artery endoluminal interventions for rest pain and tissue loss. J Vasc Surg 2008;48:619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.013
  20. Toursarkissian B, D'Ayala M, Stefanidis D, et al. Angiographic scoring of vascular occlusive disease in the diabetic foot: relevance to bypass graft patency and limb salvage. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:494-500. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.120046