DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative analysis of the microbial communities in raw milk produced in different regions of Korea

  • Kim, In Seon (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hur, Yoo Kyung (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Ji (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ahn, Young-Tae (R&BD Center, Korea Yakult Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Jong Geun (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Yun-Jaie (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Huh, Chul Sung (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.17
  • 심사 : 2017.09.19
  • 발행 : 2017.11.01

초록

Objective: The control of psychrotrophic bacteria causing milk spoilage and illness due to toxic compounds is an important issue in the dairy industry. In South Korea, Gangwon-do province is one of the coldest terrains in which eighty percent of the area is mountainous regions, and mainly plays an important role in the agriculture and dairy industries. The purposes of this study were to analyze the indigenous microbiota of raw milk in Gangwon-do and accurately investigate a putative microbial group causing deterioration in milk quality. Methods: We collected raw milk from the bulk tank of 18 dairy farms in the Hoengseong and Pyeongchang regions of Gangwon-do. Milk components were analyzed and the number of viable bacteria was confirmed. The V3 and V4 regions of 16S rRNA gene were amplified and sequenced on an Illumina Miseq platform. Sequences were then assigned to operational taxonomic units, followed by the selection of representative sequences using the QIIME software package. Results: The milk samples from Pyeongchang were higher in fat, protein, lactose, total solid, and solid non-fat, and bacterial cell counts were observed only for the Hoengseong samples. The phylum Proteobacteria was detected most frequently in both the Hoengseong and Pyeongchang samples, followed by the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Notably, Corynebacterium, Pediococcus, Macrococcus, and Acinetobacter were significantly different from two regions. Conclusion: Although the predominant phylum in raw milk is same, the abundances of major genera in milk samples were different between Hoengseong and Pyeongchang. We assumed that these differences are caused by regional dissimilar farming environments such as soil, forage, and dairy farming equipment so that the quality of milk raw milk from Pyeongchang is higher than that of Hoengseong. These results could provide the crucial information for identifying the microbiota in raw milk of South Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. von Neubeck M, Baur C, Krewinkel M, et al. Biodiversity of refrigerated raw milk microbiota and their enzymatic spoilage potential. Int J Food Microbiol 2015;211:57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.001
  2. Quigley L, O'Sullivan O, Stanton C, et al. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2013;37:664-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12030
  3. Wouters JTM, Ayad EHE, Hugenholtz J, Smit G. Microbes from raw milk for fermented dairy products. Int Dairy J 2002;12:91-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00151-0
  4. Debarry J, Garn H, Hanuszkiewicz A, et al. Acinetobacter lwoffii and Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from farm cowsheds possess strong allergy-protective properties. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;119:1514-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.03.023
  5. Hantsis-Zacharov E, Halpern M. Chryseobacterium haifense sp. nov., a psychrotolerant bacterium isolated from raw milk. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57:2344-8. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65115-0
  6. Deeth HC. Lipoprotein lipase and lipolysis in milk. Int Dairy J 2006;16:555-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.08.011
  7. de Oliveira GB, Favarin L, Luchese RH, Mclntosh D. Psychrotrophic bacteria in milk: How much do we really know? Braz J Microbiol 2015:46:313-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838246220130963
  8. 2016 Annual Report Dairy and Products Annual Korea. Seoul, Korea: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service; 2016.
  9. Rodrigues MX, Lima SF, Canniatti-Brazaca SG, Bicalho RC. The microbiome of bulk tank milk: Characterization and associations with somatic cell count and bacterial count. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:2536-52. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11540
  10. O'Connell A, Kelly AL, Tobin J, Ruegg PL, Gleeson D. The effect of storage conditions on the composition and functional properties of blended bulk tank milk. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:991-1003. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11314
  11. Kable ME, Srisengfa Y, Laird M, et al. The core and seasonal microbiota of raw bovine milk in tanker trucks and the impact of transfer to a milk processing facility. MBio 2016;7:e00836-16.
  12. Caporaso JG, Jesse Stombaugh JK, Bittinger K, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 2010;7:335-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
  13. Birkelo CP, Johnson DE, Phetteplace HP. Maintenance requirements of beef cattle as affected by season on different planes of nutrition. J Anim Sci 1991;69:1214-22. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6931214x
  14. Bohmanova J, Misztal I, Cole JB. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:1947-56. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-513
  15. Piao MY, Baik M. Seasonal variation in carcass characteristics of korean cattle steers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:442-50. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0650
  16. Delbes C, Ali-Mandjee L, Montel MC. Monitoring bacterial communities in raw milk and cheese by culture-dependent and -independent 16S rRNA gene-based analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:1882-91. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01716-06
  17. Liu W, Zheng Y, Kwok LY, et al. High-throughput sequencing for the detection of the bacterial and fungal diversity in Mongolian naturally fermented cow's milk in Russia. BMC Microbiol 2015;15:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0385-9
  18. Zhang R, Huo W, Zhu W, Mao S. Characterization of bacterial community of raw milk from dairy cows during subacute ruminal acidosis challenge by high-throughput sequencing. J Sci Food Agric 2015;95:1072-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6800
  19. Doyle CJ, Gleeson D, O'Toole PW, Cotter PD. Impacts of seasonal housing and teat preparation on raw milk microbiota: a high-throughput sequencing study. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017;83:e02694-16.
  20. Fretin M, Ferlay A, Verdier-Metz I, et al. The effects of low-input grazing systems and milk pasteurisation on the chemical composition, microbial communities, and sensory properties of uncooked pressed cheeses. Int Dairy J 2017;64:56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.09.007
  21. Masoud W, Vogensen FK, Lillevang S, et al. The fate of indigenous microbiota, starter cultures, Escherichia coli, Listeria innocua and Staphylococcus aureus in Danish raw milk and cheeses determined by pyrosequencing and quantitative real time (qRT)-PCR. Int J Food Microbiol 2012;153:192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.014
  22. Raats D, Offek M, Minz D, Halpern M. Molecular analysis of bacterial communities in raw cow milk and the impact of refrigeration on its structure and dynamics. Food Microbiol 2011;28:465-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.009
  23. Ribeiro Junior JC, Beloti V, Massi FP, Fungaro MHP. Thermoduric psychrotrophic proteolytic microbiota from refrigerated raw milk. Semi Cienc Agrar 2017;38:267-72. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n1p267
  24. Verdier-Metz I, Gagne G, Bornes S, et al. Cow teat skin, a potential source of diverse microbial populations for cheese production. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:326-33. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06229-11
  25. Piao Z, Yang L, Zhao L, Yin S. Actinobacterial community structure in soils receiving long-term organic and inorganic amendments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:526-30. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00843-07

피인용 문헌

  1. Insights into Psychrotrophic Bacteria in Raw Milk: A Review vol.82, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-19-032
  2. Robustness and efficacy of an inhibitory consortium against E. coli O26:H11 in raw milk cheeses vol.115, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107282