DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sustainable Meal Practices of Middle Aged Women at Home According to Their Lifestyles

중년 여성의 라이프스타일에 따른 가정내 지속가능한 식생활 실천

  • Chang, Hye-Ja (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University)
  • 장혜자 (단국대학교 자연과학대학 식품영양학과)
  • Accepted : 2018.02.21
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

Sustainable meal management at home will be affected by the lifestyle of the housewife. This study examined the lifestyle of middle aged women and identified their practice levels of sustainable meal management at home. A total of 438 women, aged 35 to 59, managing the family's dietary life at home and living in Seoul, Gyeonggi Province, Daejeon, and Chonnan area participated in the survey. The middle aged women showed a higher performance level of hygiene-oriented (4.15) and health-oriented dietary life (3.59), but a less convenience-oriented dietary life (2.57). Based on their lifestyle, 3 clusters were extracted: Low-interest dietary life meal manager, health and quality pursuit meal manager, and convenience and eating-out pursuit active meal manager. Among them, the cluster of health and quality pursuit meal manager showed the highest sustainable practices in 7 dimensions of sustainable practices in the home except for the saving practices (p<0.001). The criteria suggested from the study can be applicable to the guidelines of sustainable meal management at home. The study can also be helpful for educators to identify the education themes for improving housewife's sustainable meal practices, having different lifestyle and sustainable meal practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Barr S, Gile A. 2006. Sustainable lifestyles: Framing environmental action in and around the home. Geoforum, 37(2006):906-920 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.05.002
  2. BrunsK, Grunert KG. 1995. Development and testing of a crossculturally valid instrument: Food-related lifestyle. Adv Consum Res, 22:475-480
  3. Campbell-Arval V. 2015. Food-related environmental beliefs and behaviors among university undergraduates: A mixedmethods study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(3):279-295 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0071
  4. Chang H, Jeong D, Matilla A. 2016. Criteria for sustainable practices of restaurants: suggestion through review of related certification system at home and abroad. J. of Foodservice Management, 19:347-365
  5. Chang H. 2013. Development of well-being menu for the elderly generation in middle class and its commercialization strategies. Yulchon Foundation. Seoul: Republic of Korea, pp 213-327
  6. Cho SH, An HM. 2013. The effect of purchase motivation and selection attribute of home meal replacement of long-term orientation upon food-related lifestyle. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 15:370-391
  7. Ferrand C, Feart C, Martinent G, Albinet C, Andre N, Audiffren M. 2018. Dietary patterns in french home-living older adults: Results from the PRAUSE study. Archinves of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 74(2018):88-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.09.003
  8. Gregorie MB. 2010. Foodservice Organizations: A Managerial and Systems Approach. 7th ed. Pearson Education Inc., NJ, USA, pp 22-24
  9. Han DY, Lee JM. 2016. An effect of the eco-friendly consciousness of the undergraduate by the lifestyle on the purchase intention of the eco-friendly products. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(7):83-91 https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.7.83
  10. Huang E, Gregorie MB, Tangney C, Stone MK. 2011. Sustainability in hospital foodservice. J of Foodservice Business Research, 14(3):241-255 https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2011.594386
  11. Ju S, Chang H. 2016. Consumer perceptions on sustainable practices implemented in foodservice organizations in Korea. Nutrition Research and Practices, 10(1):108-114 https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2016.10.1.108
  12. Kesic T, Pri-Raih S. 2003. Market segmentation on the basis of food-related lifestyles of Croatian families. Br Food J, 105:162-174 https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700310477112
  13. Kim H, Kim J, Chang H. 2018. Suggestion of an evaluation tool for sustainable practices in school foodservices and analysis of performance: focus on Gyeonggi province. J Korean Diet Assoc, 24(1):1-18 https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2018.24.1.1
  14. Lee HY, Park JY. 2016. Marketing for restaurant and foodservice industry. 3th ed., Chungram Publisher, Seoul.
  15. Namkung Y, Jang S. 2013. Effects of restaurant green practices on brand equity formation: do green practice really matter? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33(1):85-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.06.006
  16. Robertson M. Sustainability principles and practice. Routledge, New York
  17. Ryu K, Chang H, Cha M, Kim H, Yi N. 2017. Sustainable Meal Management. 1st ed., Powerbook, Seoul
  18. Sharma A, Motta V. 2016. Benefits and transaction costs of purchasing local foods in school districts. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2016(5):81-87
  19. Srihadi TF, Hartoyo, Sukandar D. Soehadi AW. 2016. Segmentation of the tourism market for Jakarta: Classification of foreign visitors' lifestyle typologies. Tourism Management Perspectives, 19(2016):32-39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.03.005
  20. Thogersen, J. 2017. Sustainable food consumption in the nexus between national context and private lifestyle: A multilevel study. Food Quality and Preference, 55:16-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.006
  21. Yi NY, Choi BR, Chnag HJ. 2016. Opinion of commercialization of ready-to-eat foods by food-related lifestyle segments in Korean and Non-Koreans. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr, 45(4):602-612 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.4.602
  22. Yi N. 2017. Development of the contents of the guideline for dietitians' knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) for sustainable management at school foodservice. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 32(6):513-526 https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2017.32.6.513
  23. Zanteson L. 2014. Top 5 sustainable food. Environmental Nutrition, 2014(7):15 Accessed on Jan 2017. http://www.environmentalnutrition.com/issues/37_7/features/152630-1.html