대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

  • 제34권1호
  • /
  • Pages.3-14
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-9093(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-177X(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공동주택 녹색건축인증기준의 외부공간 환경성능 평가지표 보완방안 - 기후변화 대응 측면을 중심으로 -

Complementary measures for Environmental Performance Evaluation Index of External Space of Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design for Apartment Complex - Focused on the Respect of Response to Climate Change -

  • 예태곤 (서울대학교 협동과정 도시설계학전공) ;
  • 김광현 (서울대학교 건축학과) ;
  • 권영상 (서울대학교 건설환경공학부 도시설계전공)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.07
  • 심사 : 2017.12.11
  • 발행 : 2018.01.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

An apartment complex is a building use with great potential to contribute to solving problems related to urban ecological environment and climate change. The first goal of this study is to grasp the current situation of application and limitations of the ecological area rate, which is a representative evaluation index used to evaluate the environmental performance of the external space of an apartment complex in Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED). The second goal is to propose a prototype of the evaluation index for evaluating greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction performance in order to supplement the evaluation index for the environmental performance of the external space in terms of response to climate change. We analyzed 43 cases of apartment complexes certified according to G-SEED, which was enforced since July 1, 2010, and found application characteristics of each space type and the limitations of ecological area rate. We analyzed overseas green building certification systems such as LEED and BREEAM that derived implications for supplementing the limitations of ecological area rate, which is focused on the evaluation of soil and water circulation function, and set up a development direction of complementary measures. Through analysis of previous studies, relevant regulations and standards, and technical documents of the manufacturer, the heat island mitigation performance of the pavement and roof surfaces of the apartment complex and the carbon uptake performance of the trees in the apartment complex was selected as parameters to yield the GHG reduction performance of the external space of the apartment complex. Finally, a quantitative evaluation method for each parameter and a prototype of the evaluation index for the GHG reduction performance were proposed. As a result of applying the prototype to an apartment complex case, the possibility of adoption and applicability as an evaluation index of G-SEED were proved.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 서울대학교

참고문헌

  1. Akbari, H., Pomerantz, M., & Taha, H. (2001). Cool Surfaces and Shade Trees to Reduce Energy Use and Improve Air Quality In Urban Areas, Solar Energy, 70(3), pp. 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
  2. Akbari, H., Rosenfeld, A., & Menon, S. (2009). Global cooling: Increasing world-wide urban albedos to offset $CO_2$, Climatic Change, 94(3-4), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9515-9
  3. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). (2011). ANSI/ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Standard 189.1-2011 Standard for the Design of High-Performance Green Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, ASHRAE, 15-16.
  4. Bae, W., & Song, D. (2011). Urban Design Elements for the Mitigation of Urban Heat Island Effect according to Urban Spatial Hierarchy, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 27(6), 195-204.
  5. Bae, W., & Yoon, K. (2012). A Design Guideline of the Apartment House Complex for Mitigation of Heat Island Effect - For the planning agenda constructed and elected in 2005-2010, Journal of The Urban Design Insitute of Korea, 13(2), 47-60.
  6. Building Research Establishment(BRE). (2014). BREEAM International 2013 for New Construction Technical Manual, BRE Global Ltd., 279-286. Retrieved August. 29, 2015 from http://www.breeam.com/new-construction.
  7. Jang, D., & Kim, H. (2004). A Study on the Classification of Surface Type and It's Weight in Biotope-Surface-Factor, Proceeding of Spring annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 24(1), 519-522.
  8. Jang, D., & Kim, H. (2008). A Study on Improvement of Biotops Area Ratio Calculation in the Housing Perfomance Grading Indication System, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 24(6), 35-42.
  9. Jo, H., & Ahn, T. (2001). Annal $CO_2$ Uptake and Atmospheric Purification by Urban Coniferous Trees, Journal of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology, 15(2), 118-124.
  10. Jo, H., & Ahn, T. (2012). Carbon Storage and Uptake by Deciduous Tree Species for Urban Landscape, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 40(5), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.5.160
  11. Jo, H., & Cho, D. (1998). Annual $CO_2$ Uptake by Urban Popular Landscape Tree Species, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 26(2), 38-53.
  12. Jo, H., Kim, J., & Park, H. (2013). Carbon Storage and Uptake by Evergreen Trees for Urban Landscape - For Pinus densiflora and Pinus koraiensis, Journal of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology, 27(5), 571-578. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2013.27.5.571
  13. Jo, H., Kim, J., & Park, H. (2014). Carbon Reduction Effects of Urban Landscape Trees and Development of Quantitative Models - For Five Native Species, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 42(5), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.5.013
  14. Kim, H., Moon, S., Jang, D., & Lee, K. (2006). A Study on the Classification of Surface Type and It's Weight in Biotope-Area-Factor, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 22(5), 175-182.
  15. Kim, J., Kim, H., Kim, J., & Tae, C. (2014). A Study on Improvement of Ecological Environment Certification Criteria in the G-SEED, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 30(11), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.11.195
  16. Korea Forest Research Institute(KFRI). (2010). Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Urban Green Areas - in Case of Seoul Metropolis. Research Report, KFRI, 11-16.
  17. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology(KICT). (1999). A Study on the Development of the Fundamental Technology for Ecocity (III), KICT, 182-184.
  18. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology(KICT). (2002). A Study on the Development of the Core Technology for Ecocity (III), KICT, 34-35.
  19. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology(KICT). (2004). Application of Biotope Space Factor in Planning System, KICT, 19-37.
  20. Lee, G. (2003). Sustainability indicators of greenspace in apartment sites, Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  21. Lee, K., & Hong, W. (2008). A Study on the Urban Heat Environment Pattern Analysis and Alleviation Plan, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 24(9), 253-260.
  22. McPherson, E. (1998). Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento's urban forest, Journal of Arboriculture, 24(4), 215-223.
  23. Mok J., & Kim D. (2005). A Simulation of Biotope Area Factor(BAF) for Application of District Unit Plan in Seoul, Journal of the Korea Planning Association, 40(5), 87-100.
  24. Nowak, D., & Crane, D. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the United States, Environmental Pollution, 116, 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7
  25. Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI). (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4. Chapter 8 Settlements, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC).
  26. U.S. Green Building Council(USGBC). (2013). LEED Reference Guide for Building Design and Construction. 2013 Edition, Washington, USGBC, 163-206.