DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The meat quality, muscle fiber characteristics and fatty acid profile in Jinjiang and F1 Simmental×Jinjiang yellow cattle

  • Zheng, Yue (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Shizhi (Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Yan, Peishi (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2017.04.26
  • Accepted : 2017.07.28
  • Published : 2018.02.01

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the meat quality, muscle fiber characteristics, and fatty acids between Jinjiang yellow cattle (JJ) and F1 Simmental${\times}$Jinjiang yellow cattle (SJ) which were offered the same diet. Methods: Six JJ and six SJ individuals were reared and fattened from 10 to 26 months of age. After feeding, the highrib (HR), ribeye (RB), and tenderloin (TL) samples were taken from the carcass for meat quality evaluations. Results: The results showed that growth performance of SJ was higher than that of JJ (higher live weight and average daily gain), and the hot carcass weight of SJ was higher than that of JJ (p<0.05). pH of JJ was higher than that of SJ in TL (p<0.05); the color of $a^{\ast}$ of SJ was higher than that of JJ in TL and RB (p<0.05); the cooking loss of SJ was significantly lower than that of JJ in TL and RB (p<0.05); the shear force value was significantly lower in SJ compared to JJ (p<0.05); the muscle fiber diameter was higher and the fiber density was lower in SJ compared to JJ in HR and TL (p<0.05); compared to SJ, the muscles of JJ had higher saturated fatty acid (SFA) composition; the sum of monounsaturated fatty acid and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) were lower in the muscle of JJ; the mRNA expressions of myosin heavy chain-I (MyHC-I) and MyHC-IIa were higher in SJ compared to JJ in muscle of HR and RB; the mRNA expressions of MyHC-IIx and MyHC-IIb were lower in SJ compared to JJ in HR and RB (p<0.05). Conclusion: Meat quality and fatty acid profile differed between SJ and JJ; the muscle of SJ had higher $a^{\ast}$ and SFA; SJ had lower cooking loss, shear force and PUFA compared to the muscle of JJ. In addition, the type and development characteristics of the muscle fiber had some difference between SJ and JJ; these might be factors which caused the differences in meat quality and fatty acid profile between SJ and JJ.

Keywords

References

  1. Milicevic D, Vranic D, Masic Z, et al. The role of total fats, saturated/unsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol content in chicken meat as cardiovascular risk factors. Lipids Health Dis 2014;13:1.
  2. Picard B, Lefaucheur L, Berri C, Duclos MJ. Muscle fibre ontogenesis in farm animal species. Reprod Nutr Dev 2002;42:415-31. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2002035
  3. Pette D, Staron RS. Mammalian skeletal muscle fiber type transitions. Int Rev Cytol 1997;170:143-223.
  4. Pette D, Staron RS. Myosin isoforms, muscle fiber types, and transitions. Microsc Res Tech 2000;50:500-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0029(20000915)50:6<500::AID-JEMT7>3.0.CO;2-7
  5. Kim G-D, Jeong J-Y, Jung E-Y, et al. The influence of fiber size distribution of type IIB on carcass traits and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci 2013;94:267-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.02.001
  6. Herdmann A, Martin Jr, Nuernberg G, Dannenberger D, Nuernberg K. Effect of dietary n-3 and n-6 PUFA on lipid composition of different tissues of German Holstein bulls and the fate of bioactive fatty acids during processing. J Agr Food Chem 2010;58:8314-21. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf101145y
  7. Xie X, Meng Q, Cui Z, Ren L. Effect of cattle breed on meat quality, muscle fiber characteristics, lipid oxidation and fatty acids in China. Asian-Australasian J Anim 2012;25:824-31. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11462
  8. Zhou G, Liu L, Xiu X, et al. Productivity and carcass characteristics of pure and crossbred Chinese Yellow Cattle. Meat Sci 2001;58:359-62.
  9. Straadt IK, Rasmussen M, Andersen HJ, Bertram HC. Aging-induced changes in microstructure and water distribution in fresh and cooked pork in relation to water-holding capacity and cooking loss-A combined confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation study. Meat Sci 2007;75:687-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.09.019
  10. Xia X, Kong B, Liu J, Diao X, Liu Q. Influence of different thawing methods on physicochemical changes and protein oxidation of porcine longissimus muscle. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2012;46:280-6.
  11. Baublits R, Pohlman F, Brown A, Johnson Z. Effects of sodium chloride, phosphate type and concentration, and pump rate on beef biceps femoris quality and sensory characteristics. Meat Sci 2005;70:205-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.12.011
  12. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley G. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957;226:497-09.
  13. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the $2^{-{\Delta}{\Delta}CT}$ method. Meth 2001;25:402-8.
  14. Warriss P. Meat science: an introductory text (Cabi). Wallingford, UK: Oxfordshire; 2010.
  15. Joo S, Kim G, Hwang Y, Ryu Y. Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci 2013;95:828-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.044
  16. Jeleníková J, Pipek P, Staruch L. The influence of ante-mortem treatment on relationship between pH and tenderness of beef. Meat Sci 2008;80:870-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.04.004
  17. Mancini R, Hunt M. Current research in meat color. Meat Sci 2005;71:100-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.003
  18. Ryu Y, Kim B. Comparison of histochemical characteristics in various pork groups categorized by postmortem metabolic rate and pork quality. J Anim Sci 2006;84:894-901.
  19. Xi SZ, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Fatty acid and transcriptome profiling of longissimus dorsi muscles between pig breeds differing in meat quality. Int J Biol Sci 2013;9:108-18. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.5306
  20. Vahmani P, Mapiye C, Prieto N, et al. The scope for manipulating the polyunsaturated fatty acid content of beef: a review. J Anim Sci Biothechnol 2015;6:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0026-z
  21. Adeyemi KD, Sabow AB, Shittu RM, Karim R, Sazili AQ. Influence of dietary canola oil and palm oil blend and refrigerated storage on fatty acids, myofibrillar proteins, chemical composition, antioxidant profile and quality attributes of semimembranosus muscle in goats. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015;6:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0050-z
  22. Tintut Y, Demer LL. Effects of bioactive lipids and lipoproteins on bone. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2014;25:53-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2013.10.001
  23. Gurikar A, Lakshmanan V, Gadekar Y, Sharma B, Anjaneyulu A. Effect of meat chunk size, massaging time and cooking time on quality of restructured pork blocks. J Food Sci Technol 2014;51:1363-9.
  24. Siro I, Ven C, Balla C, Jonas G, Zeke I, Friedrich L. Application of an ultrasonic assisted curing technique for improving the diffusion of sodium chloride in porcine meat. J Food Eng 2009;91:353-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.09.015
  25. Srednicka-Tober D, Baranski M, Seal CJ, et al. Higher PUFA and n-3 PUFA, conjugated linoleic acid, ${\alpha}$-tocopherol and iron, but lower iodine and selenium concentrations in organic milk: a systematic literature review and meta-and redundancy analyses. Br J Nutr 2016;115:1043-60.
  26. Schmitz G, Ecker J. The opposing effects of n−3 and n−6 fatty acids. Prog Lipid Res 2008;47:147-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2007.12.004
  27. Hiller B, Angulo J, Olivera M, Nuernberg G, Nuernberg K. How selected tissues of lactating Holstein cows respond to dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation. Lipids 2013;48:357-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-012-3737-3
  28. Nogi T, Honda T, Mukai F, Okagaki T, Oyama K. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of fatty acid compositions in longissimus muscle lipid with carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle. J Anim Sci 2011;89:615-21. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2300
  29. Ryu Y, Kim B-C. Comparison of histochemical characteristics in various pork groups categorized by postmortem metabolic rate and pork quality. J Anim Sci 2006;84:894-901. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844894x
  30. Nam Y, Choi Y, Lee S, et al. Sensory evaluations of porcine longissimus dorsi muscle: Relationships with postmortem meat quality traits and muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci 2009;83:731-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.015

Cited by

  1. The alternative approach of low temperature-long time cooking on bovine semitendinosus meat quality vol.32, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0347
  2. RNA-Seq Analysis Identifies Differentially Expressed Genes in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in Qaidaford Cattle, Cattle-Yak, and Angus Cattle vol.9, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121077
  3. Fatty Acid Profile of Muscles from Crossbred Angus-Simmental, Wagyu-Simmental, and Chinese Simmental Cattles vol.40, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e33
  4. Comparative Study on Pale, Soft and Exudative (PSE) and Red, Firm and Non-Exudative (RFN) Pork: Protein Changes during Aging and the Differential Protein Expression of the Myofibrillar Fraction at 1 h vol.10, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040733
  5. Effects of prolonged photoperiod on growth performance, serum lipids and meat quality of Jinjiang cattle in winter vol.34, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0750
  6. Lipid Metabolism, Carcass Characteristics and Longissimus dorsi Muscle Fatty Acid Composition of Tropical Crossbred Beef Cattle in Response to Desmanthus spp. Forage Backgrounding vol.11, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120804