DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Utilisation of Non Timber Forest Products in Botswana: The Case of Commercialisation of Mopane Worms (Imbraisia belina) in Central District, Botswana

  • Mogomotsi, Patricia Kefilwe (Okavango Research Institute, University of Botswana) ;
  • Mogomotsi, Goemeone E.J (Department of Legal Services, Office of the Vice Chancellor, University of Botswana) ;
  • Gondo, Reniko (Okavango Research Institute, University of Botswana)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.14
  • 심사 : 2018.01.30
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28

초록

In Botswana, mopane worms are widely harvested for household consumption. They are also traded for income generation. Urban based entrepreneurs' source mopane worms from rural areas to sell. The price of sourcing mopane worms from the harvesters has increased quite incredibly in villages. However, there is dearth of academic studies on the commercialisation of mopane worms in Botswana. This paper uses primary data collected from multiple sources to investigate the factors influencing the prices of mopane worms. Data collection involved administration of questionnaires to purposively selected harvesters in four campsites in the Central District, focus group discussions at each campsite and key informant interviews. The results show that there is declining population of mopane worms. The decline is attributable to such factors as over-harvesting and climate change which are the main factors influencing the price of mopane worms. In addition to physical scarcity of mopane worms, institutional weaknesses exist in the study area. The Agricultural Resources Conservation Act is ineffective and the majority of the harvesters are unaware of its existences. It is recommended that the regulations on the harvesting of mopane worms be reviewed. In order to benefit harvesters, mopane worms should be processed to add diversified economic value to rural communities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andrew NR, Hill SJ, Binns M, Bahar MH, Ridley EV, Jung MP, Fyfe C, Yates M, Khusro M. 2013. Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading? Peer J 1: e11. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11
  2. Baiyegunhi L, Oppong B, Senyolo G. 2016. Mopane worm (Imbrasia belina) and rural household food security in Limpopo province, South Africa. Food Secur 8: 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0536-8
  3. Brousseau E, Glachant JM. 2008. New institutional economics: a guidebook. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  4. DeMmotts R, Haller T, Hoon P, Saum R. 2009. Dynamics of common pool resource management in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Dev South Afr 26: 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350903181357
  5. Gardiner A. 2005. Farming Mopane Worms - a household guide. English version. Unpublished manuscript, Harare.
  6. Ghaly AE. 2009. The use of insects as human food in Zambia. OnLine J Biol Sci 9: 93-104. https://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2009.93.104
  7. Gondo T, Frost P, Kozanayi W, Stack J, Mushongahande M. 2010. Linking knowledge and practice: assessing options for sustainable use of Mopane worms (Imbrasia belina) in Southern Zimbabwe. J Sustain Dev Afr 12: 127-145.
  8. Hope RA, Frost PGH, Gardiner A, Ghazoul J. 2009. Experimental analysis of adoption of domestic mopane worm farming technology in Zimbabwe. Dev South Afr 26: 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350802640065
  9. Illgner P, Nel E. 2000. The geography of edible insects in sub-Saharan Africa: a study of the mopane caterpillar. Geogr J 166: 336-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2000.tb00035.x
  10. Jim K. 2015. Scientists engage phane harvesters. BCA Newsletter, pp. 10-11.
  11. Kozanayi W, Frost P. 2002. Marketing of mopane worm in souther Zimbabwe. Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, 31 pp.
  12. Kwiri R, Winini C, Muredzi P, Tongonya J, Gwala W, Mujuru F, Gwala ST. 2014. Mopane worm (Gonimbrasia belina) utilisation, a potential source of protein ion fortified blended foods in Zimbabwe: a review. Glob J Sci Front Res 14: 55-67.
  13. Lieberherr E. 2009. Policy Relevance of New Institutional Economics? Assessing Efficiency, Legitimacy and Effectiveness. Discussion paper series on the Coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures.
  14. Makhado R, Potgieter M, Timberlake J, Gumbo D. 2014. A review of the significance of mopane pproducts to rural people's livelihood in southern Africa. Trans Roy Soc S Afr 69: 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2014.922512
  15. Makhado R. 2008. Mopane wood utilisation and management perceptions of rural inhabitants in the Greater Giyani Municipality, Limpopo Province. Unpublished Msc Dissertation. Sovenga: University of Limpopo.
  16. Morebodi BH. 2001. Botswana: Towards a national geospatial data infrastructure. In: International Conference on Spatial Information for Sustainable Development; Nairobi, Kenya; October 2-5 2001.
  17. Mpuchane S, Gashe BA, Allotey J, Siame B, Teferra G, Ditlhogo M. 2000. Quality deterioration of phane, the edible caterpillar of an emperor moth Imbrasia beliana. Food Control 11: 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(00)00010-4
  18. Muchapondwa Edwin, Akpalu W, Precious Zikhali. 2009. Can the restrictive harvest period policy conserve mopane worms in southern Africa? A bioeconomic modelling approach. Environment and Development Economics 14: 587-600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X0900518X
  19. Naidoo S, Davis C, Van Gardener EA. 2013. Forest, rangelands and climate change in Southern Africa. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
  20. Nascimento DM, Alves RRN, Barboza RRD, Schmidt AJ, Mourao JS. 2017. Commercial relationships between intermediaries and harvesters of the mangrove crab Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) in the Mamanguape River estuary, Brazil, and their socio-ecological implications. Ecol Econ 131: 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.017
  21. Neumann RP, Hirch E. 2000. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: review and analysis of research. Center for International Forestry Research, Bagor.
  22. Ostrom E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  23. Ostrom E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100: 641-672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
  24. Ouma E, Jagwe J, Obare GA, Abele S. 2010. Determinants of smallholder farmers' participation in banana markets in Central Africa: the role of transaction costs. Agric Econ 41: 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00429.x
  25. Thomas B. 2013. Sustainable harvesting and trading og mopane worms (Imbrasia belina) in Northern Namibia: an experience from the Uukwaluudhi area. Int J Environ Stud 70: 494-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.829324
  26. Wessels KJ, Prince SD, Frost PE, van Zyl D. 2004. Assessing the effects of human-induced land degradation in the former homelands of northern South Africa with a 1 km AVHRR NDVI time-series. Remote Sens Environ 91: 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.005