East Asian Economic Review

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (대외경제정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitive Sectors in Free Trade Agreements

  • Deardorff, Alan V. (University of Michigan)
  • Received : 2018.08.01
  • Accepted : 2018.10.19
  • Published : 2018.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper documents the presence of "sensitive sectors" in Free Trade Agreements, defined as sectors for which the within-FTA tariffs remain positive. The paper includes some brief theoretical discussion of the welfare implications of these, but the main emphasis is on reporting two measures of this phenomenon for countries in FTAs that entered into force between 1994 and 2003. One measure is the percentage of tariff lines that remain dutiable, and the second is the change, from before the FTA to after, in the average maximum (across 6-digit products) positive tariffs. Both measures are derived from data in the UNCTAD TRAINS database, and are then related to measures of country characteristics that might explain them. Low per capita GDP countries tend to have larger fractions of dutiable tariff lines, while higher income countries tend to post larger increases in average maximum positive tariffs. Both suggest that the favored treatment of sensitive sectors is undermining the potential gains from trade that FTAs could provide.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, J. E. and J. P. Neary. 2007. "Welfare Versus Market Access: The Implications of Tariff Structure for Tariff Reform," Journal of International Economics, vol. 71, no. 1, March, pp. 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.004
  2. Caliendo, L. and F. Parro. 2015. "Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA," Review of Economic Studies, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu035
  3. Deardorff, A. V. 2017. Sensitive Sectors in Free Trade Agreements. RSIE Discussion Paper, no. 663.
  4. Deardorff, A. V. 2018. "Rue the ROOs: Rules of Origin and the Gains (or Losses) from Trade Agreements," International Trade Journal, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2018.1503575
  5. Fontagne, L., Laborde, D. and C. Mitaritonna. 2011. "An Impact Study of the Economic Partnership Agreements in the Six ACP Regions," Journal of African Economies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 179-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejq037
  6. Gawande, K., Sanguinetti, P. and A. Bohara. 2002. Exclusions for Sale: Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Model of Free Trade Agreements. May 17, 2002, Seminario de Economia. La Plata: Facultad de Ciencias Economicas.
  7. Krueger, A. O. 1999. Trade Creation and Trade Diversion under NAFTA. NBER Working Paper, no. 7429.
  8. Olarreaga, M. and I. Soloaga. 1998. "Endogenous Tariff Formation: The Case of Mercosur," World Bank Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 297-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/12.2.297
  9. Viner, J. 1950. The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.