Journal of Forest and Environmental Science

  • 제34권2호
  • /
  • Pages.145-152
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2288-9744(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9752(eISSN)
강원대학교 산림과학연구소 (Institute of Forest Science, kangwon National University)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Carbon Stock Variation in Different Forest Types of Western Himalaya, Uttarakhand

  • 투고 : 2017.09.15
  • 심사 : 2017.10.30
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Quantification of Carbon stock has become in the contest of changing climate and mitigation potential of forests. Two different forest types, Dry Shiwalik Sal Forest and Moist Shiwalik Sal Forest in Barkot and Lachchiwala of Doon Valley, Western Himalaya are selected for the study. Volume equations, destructive sampling and laboratory analysis are done to estimate the carbon stock in different carbon pools like trees, shrubs, herbs and soils. Considerable variations are observed in terms of carbon stocks in different forest types. In Dry Shiwalik Sal Forest, carbon stock density varied between 129.81 and $136.00MgCha^{-1}$ while in Moist Shiwalik Sal Forest, carbon stock density ranged from 222.29 to $271.67MgCha^{-1}$. Tree species like Shorea robusta, Syzigium cumini, Miliusa velutina, Acacia catechu, and Mallotus philippensis had significant role in carbon sequestration. Shorea robusta had contributed highest in carbon stock due to highest density. Total of 2,338,280.165 Mg carbon stock was estimated in all the forest types.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Babu CR. 1977. Herbaceous flora of Dehra Dun. Publications & Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi.
  2. Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, Delhi.
  3. Devi LS, Yadava PS. 2015. Carbon stock and rate of carbon se- questration in Dipterocarpus forests of Manipur, Northeast India. J For Res 26: 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0070-8
  4. Gaur RD. 1999. Flora of the district Garhwal, North West Himalaya: with ethnobotanical notes. TransMedia, Srinagar (Garhwal), India.
  5. Haripriya GS. 2000. Estimates of biomass in Indian forests. Bio Bio 19: 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00040-4
  6. ICFRE (Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education). 2016. Stocktaking of REDD+ in India. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun, India.
  7. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan.
  8. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan.
  9. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  10. Jana BK, Biswas S, Majumder M, Roy PK, Mazumdar A. 2009. Carbon sequestration rate and aboveground biomass carbon po- tential of four young species. J Ecol Nat Environ 1: 15-24.
  11. Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK. 2010. Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15: 489-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9230-5
  12. Khum BTM, Shrestha BB. 2015. Carbon Stock in Community Managed Hill Sal (Shorea robusta) Forests of Central Nepal. J Sustain For 34: 483-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2015.1031251
  13. Lal M, Singh R. 2000. Carbon sequestration potential of Indian forests. Environ Monit Assess 60: 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006139418804
  14. Manhas RK, Negi JDS, Rajesh K, Chauhan PS. 2006. Temporal assessment of growing stock, biomass and carbon stock of Indian forests. Clim Change 74: 191-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-9011-4
  15. Mukesh KG, Rajesh KM, Ashutosh KT. 2014. Plant species diversity in unmanaged moist deciduous forest of Northern India. Curr Sci 106: 277-287.
  16. Negi SS, Gupta MK, Sharma SD. 2013. Sequestered Organic Carbon Pool in the Forest Soils of Uttarakhand State, India. Int J Sci Environ Technol 2: 510-520.
  17. Qing L, Tang LN, Ren Y. 2011. Temporal dynamics and spatial variations of forest vegetation carbon stock in Liaoning Province, China. J For Res 22: 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0195-3
  18. Rajput SS, Shukla NK, Gupta VK, Jain JD. 1996. Timber mechanics: strength, classification and grading of timber. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun.
  19. Ramachandaran A, Jayakumar S, Haroon RM, Bhaskaran A, Arockiasamy DI. 2007. Carbon sequestration: estimation of carbon stock in natural forests using geospatial technology in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Curr Sci 92: 323-331.
  20. Rawat VRS, Singh TP. 2016. Forests under Paris Climate Agreement. Ind For 142: 513-514.
  21. Sahu SC, Kumar M, Ravindranath NH. 2016. Carbon stocks in natural and planted mangrove forests of Mahanadi Mangrove Wetland, East Coast of India. Curr Sci 110: 2253-2260. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v110/i12/2253-2260
  22. Singh TP, Rawat VRS, Rawat RS. 2015. Implementing REDD+ as a climate mitigation option in India. Indian For 141: 9-17.
  23. Tewari DN. 1995. A Monograph on Sal, India, Vedam Publications.
  24. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2016. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015; 2015 Nov 30-Dec 13; Paris, France: UNFCCC.
  25. Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37: 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  26. Wilde SA, Voigt GK, Iyer JG. 1964. Soil and Plant Analysis for Tree Culture. Oxford Publishing House, Calcutta, India.