DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessing Compliance with the Wildlife Crossing Guideline in South Korea

  • 투고 : 2018.03.19
  • 심사 : 2018.04.03
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30

초록

To restore the connectivity of fragmented habitats, 415 wildlife crossings have been built between 1998 and 2014 in South Korea. However, their effect on wildlife conservation is still in doubt. As a first step to examine the effectiveness, our study aims to assess compliance with the guideline for wildlife crossing construction and management, developed by the Ministry of Environment Korea that provides fundamental information to understand the status and the problem of wildlife crossings in Korea and thus to provide practical guidance for the improvement. According to our survey, the Korea National Park Service complied with the guideline best (62.5%) while local government followed the guideline least (46.1%). In addition, the compliance rate was the highest for wildlife crossings in national roads (53.6%) followed by highways (53.2%) and local and municipal roads (52.2%). For the overpass wildlife crossings, the compliance rates for installation of an escaping facility in the drainage and prevention of pedestrian and vehicle access were particularly low. In case of underpass wildlife crossings, small ditches for amphibians and reptiles were not sufficient, and the linkage between wildlife fences and underpass were weak. In order to ensure the effectiveness of wildlife crossings, the effort to increase the compliance rate with the guideline is critical, and mandating the guideline could be a practical way to enforce the compliance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beckmann JP, Clevenger AP, Huijser MP, Hilty JA. 2010. Safe passages: highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity. Island Press, Washington.
  2. Choi TY, Yang BG, Woo DG. 2012. The suitable types and meas- ures of wildlife crossing structures for mammals of Korea. J Environ Impact Assess 21: 209-218. (in Korean)
  3. De Montis A, Ledda A, Ortega E, Martin B, Serra V. 2018. Landscape planning and defragmentation measures: an assessment of costs and critical issues. Land Use Policy 72: 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.068
  4. Glista DJ, DeVault TL, DeWoody JA. 2009. A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife morality on roadways. Landscape Urban Plan 91: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.001
  5. Kim K, Hong S. 1997. Accounting for rapid economic growth in Korea, 1963-1995. Korea Development Institute, Seoul.
  6. Ministry of Environment. 2003. Guidelines for design and management of wildlife crossing structures in Korea. Ministry of Environment, Gwacheon. (in Korean)
  7. Ministry of Environment. 2010. Guidelines for design and management of wildlife crossing structures in Korea. Ministry of Environment, Gwacheon. (in Korean)
  8. National Institute of Ecology. 2017. Wildlife Crossing Network. http://wildlifecrossing.nie.re.kr/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.
  9. Statistics Korea. 2017. Statistics System. http://www.index.go.kr. Accessed 11 Feb 2017.