대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.105-116
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-9093(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-177X(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공개공지 조성지침 시대별 특징 및 개선방안 연구

A Study for Ameliorating Design Guidelines to Vitalize Privately Owned Public Space(POPS)

  • 투고 : 2017.06.14
  • 심사 : 2018.02.07
  • 발행 : 2018.03.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

POPS(Privately Owned Public Spaces) is one of the major component that vitalize the city by private sectors providing open-spaces to the public. It holds great significances and possibilities within CBD(Central Business District) which lack open-space and green-space. Despite of its importance, a large number of problems such as deficient accessibility for the public and being unpractical from constructing only with formality occur in existing POPS. POPS should be for both owners and public because it is a public space located within a private estate. To vitalize POPS, functions like "diversity", "accessibility and connectivity", and "usability" are essential. Providing diverse types of spaces makes dynamic city, and the spaces must have easy access by public and variety of functions. Managements by diverse types of POPS are necessary to improve availability and to provides suitable spaces. To make diverse types of POPS, advanced classifications of type and clear criteria are required. From aspect of accessibility and connectivity, firstly detailed instructions for the arrangement are necessary for reinforcement. Specific research on means of connection such as how many faces of POPS should adjoin streets and in which direction it should be facing should be applied. Purposes of POPS must be specified depending on the type of POPS. By connecting adjacent buildings with POPS, one of the main principal of vitalizing POPS, inflow of people can be increased. Accordingly, improvements of design guidelines in "diversity", "accessibility and connectivity", and "usability" can be suggested to vitalize POPS. With these concerns in mind, this paper analyzes problems of current Seoul POPS guidelines with three aspects.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 중앙대학교

참고문헌

  1. CABE. (2007). Bringing it all back home. Its our space, 16. Retrieved June 13, 2008 from http://www.idi-design.ie/content/files/its-our-space.pdf
  2. Jeong, S. (1994). Approach to the partnership in urban space design based on an analysis of the public characteristics in the exterior space of architecture : focusing on 'the public open space' of the high-rise office buildings in Seoul. Seoul National University, Thesis.
  3. Kim, BW. (2008). Bringing it all back home. How to make a good place, 1. Retrieved December 31, 2008 from https://www.pps.org/article/goodplaces
  4. Kim, DG. & Kim, GY. (2011). A Study on the improvement of legal policies for activating public open sSpace in urban environment improving project of Seoul Cit.. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture.
  5. Kim, JH. (2006). A Study on the Utilization of the Public Open Space on Mixed-Use Apartment in Busan. Chung-ang University, Thesis.
  6. Kim, JH. & Woo, DJ. (2005). Study on the improvement of open space incentive zoning. Korean Association of Architectural Societies.
  7. Kwon, OS. (2015). A study on utilization of city public space in downtown. Hanyang University, Thesis.
  8. Lee, CH. (2005). A study on the improving publicity through open space of building. Hongik University, Thesis.
  9. Lee, GS. (2003). A study on the characteristics of indoor-public open space in urban setting. Chung-ang University, Thesis.
  10. Lee, SM. & Kim, YH. (2012). The Improvement of System on Privately Owned Public Space for Elevating the Quality of Urban Public Spaces. Architecture and Urban Research Institute.
  11. Lee, WJ. (2016). Study for ameliorating design guidelines to vitalize privately owned public space. Chung-ang University, Thesis.
  12. Park, CS. (2012). A study on spatial composition of landscape for quality improvement of open space in urban. Kongju National University, Thesis.
  13. Park, JI. (2010). A study on the improvement of design guideline for the use enhancement of privately owned public space. Korea University, Thesis.
  14. Seoul Metropolitan City. (2000). District Unit Plan Guideline.
  15. Seoul Metropolitan City. (2009). A Study on the Joint Evaluation Criteria of Apartment Building in Seoul.
  16. Seoul Metropolitan City. (2010). Historical Cultural Landscape of Seoul Metropolitan City.
  17. Seoul Metropolitan City. (2010). Seoul Metropolitan Environmental Renewal Program in 2020.
  18. Seoul Metropolitan City. (2011). A Study on the Criteria of Comprehensive Housing and Public Buildings in Seoul Metropolitan Area.
  19. Seoul Metropolitan City. (2014). 2014 Guideline for the Implementation of District Unit Plan in Seoul.
  20. Seoul Metropolitan City. (2015). Criteria for Determining the Relationship Between Buildings in Seoul Metropolitan Area.
  21. The Ministry of Construction. (1983). Guidelines for Developing Urban Design Criteria.
  22. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2012). District Unit Plan Guideline.
  23. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (2014). District Unit Plan Guideline.
  24. Urban Design Institute of Korea. (2006). A Study on the Utilization of Outdoor Spaces for Landscape and Urban Culture, Ministry of Culture. Sports and Tourism, 180.
  25. Urban Design Institute of Korea. (2012). Korean Urban Design Agency. Boseongak, 76-80.
  26. Yoo, GH. (2012). A study on the analysis and activating plan of public of privately owned open space. Hanyang University, Thesis.
  27. Yoon, JH. & Kim, JG. (2005). A Study on the Need for Indoor-Public Space and Publicity in Urban Setting. Architectural Institute of Korea.