DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In silico approaches to identify the functional and structural effects of non-synonymous SNPs in selective sweeps of the Berkshire pig genome

  • Shin, Donghyun (Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Oh, Jae-Don (Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Won, Kyeong-Hye (Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Ki-Duk (Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.19
  • 심사 : 2018.01.30
  • 발행 : 2018.08.01

초록

Objective: Non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) were identified in Berkshire selective sweep regions and then were investigated to discover genetic nsSNP mechanisms that were potentially associated with Berkshire domestication and meat quality. We further used bioinformatics tools to predict damaging amino-acid substitutions in Berkshire-related nsSNPs. Methods: nsSNPs were examined in whole genome resequencing data of 110 pigs, including 14 Berkshire pigs, generated using the Illumina Hiseq2000 platform to identify variations that might affect meat quality in Berkshire pigs. Results: Total 65,550 nsSNPs were identified in the mapped regions; among these, 319 were found in Berkshire selective-sweep regions reported in a previous study. Genes encompassing these nsSNPs were involved in lipid metabolism, intramuscular fatty-acid deposition, and muscle development. The effects of amino acid change by nsSNPs on protein functions were predicted using sorting intolerant from tolerant and polymorphism phenotyping V2 to reveal their potential roles in biological processes that may correlate with the unique Berkshire meat-quality traits. Conclusion: Our nsSNP findings confirmed the history of Berkshire pigs and illustrated the effects of domestication on generic-variation patterns. Our novel findings, which are generally consistent with those of previous studies, facilitated a better understanding of Berkshire domestication. In summary, we extensively investigated the relationship between genomic composition and phenotypic traits by scanning for nsSNPs in large-scale whole-genome sequencing data.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jeong H, Song KD, Seo M, et al. Exploring evidence of positive selection reveals genetic basis of meat quality traits in Berkshire pigs through whole genome sequencing. BMC Genet 2015;16:104.
  2. Hazel LN. The Genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 1943;28:476-90.
  3. Li M, Tian S, Yeung CK, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of Berkshire (European native pig) provides insights into its origin and domestication. Sci Rep 2014;4:4678.
  4. Wood JD, Nute GR, Richardson RI, et al. Effects of breed, diet and muscle on fat deposition and eating quality in pigs. Meat Sci 2004;67:651-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.01.007
  5. Ryu YC, Choi YM, Lee SH, et al. Comparing the histochemical characteristics and meat quality traits of different pig breeds. Meat Sci 2008;80:363-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.12.020
  6. Lee SH, Choi YM, Choe JH, et al. Association between polymorphisms of the heart fatty acid binding protein gene and intramuscular fat content, fatty acid composition, and meat quality in Berkshire breed. Meat Sci 2010;86:794-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.024
  7. Jeong DW, Choi YM, Lee SH, et al. Correlations of trained panel sensory values of cooked pork with fatty acid composition, muscle fiber type, and pork quality characteristics in Berkshire pigs. Meat Science. 2010;86:607-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.011
  8. Oh JD, Kim ES, Lee HK, Song KD. Effect of a c-MYC gene polymorphism (g.3350G>C) on meat quality traits in Berkshire. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:1545-50. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0425
  9. Lee SH, Choi YM, Choe JH, et al. Association between polymorphisms of the heart fatty acid binding protein gene and intramuscular fat content, fatty acid composition, and meat quality in Berkshire breed. Meat Sci 2010;86:794-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.024
  10. Suzuki K, Shibata T, Kadowaki H, Abe H, Toyoshima T. Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc. Meat Sci 2003;64:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00134-1
  11. Kang YK, Choi YM, Lee SH, et al. Effects of myosin heavy chain isoforms on meat quality, fatty acid composition, and sensory evaluation in Berkshire pigs. Meat Sci 2011;89:384-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.019
  12. Cho IC, Park HB, Yoo CK, et al. QTL analysis of white blood cell, platelet and red blood cell-related traits in an F2 intercross between Landrace and Korean native pigs. Anim Genet 2011;42:621-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02204.x
  13. Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:443-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2986
  14. Ramensky V, Bork P, Sunyaev S. Human non-synonymous SNPs: server and survey. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:3894-900. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf493
  15. Radivojac P, Vacic V, Haynes C, et al. Identification, analysis, and prediction of protein ubiquitination sites. Proteins 2010;78:365-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22555
  16. Doniger SW, Kim HS, Swain D, Corcuera D, Williams M, Yang S-P, Fay JC. A catalog of neutral and deleterious polymorphism in yeast. PLoS Genet 2008;4:e1000183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000183
  17. Daley D, Park JE, He J-Q, et al. Associations and interactions of genetic polymorphisms in innate immunity genes with early viral infections and susceptibility to asthma and asthma-related phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:1284-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.051
  18. Azad AK, Sadee W, Schlesinger LS. Innate immune gene polymorphisms in tuberculosis. Infect Immun 2012:80:3343-59. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00443-12
  19. Netea MG, Wijmenga C, O'Neill LA. Genetic variation in Toll-like receptors and disease susceptibility. Nat Immunol 2012;13:535-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2284
  20. Noreen M, Arshad M. Association of TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, and TIRAP polymorphisms with disease susceptibility. Immunol Res 2015;62:234-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-015-8640-6
  21. Ghosh M, Sodhi SS, Sharma N, et al. An integrated in silico approach for functional and structural impact of non- synonymous SNPs in the MYH1 gene in Jeju native pigs. BMC Genet 2016;17:35.
  22. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
  23. Andrews S. Fastqc: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Babraham Institute; 2010 [cited 2017 Mar]. Available from: http://www.bioinformaticsbabrahamacuk/projects/fastqc
  24. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
  25. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
  26. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2010;20:1297-303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110
  27. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2156-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
  28. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000;155:945-59.
  29. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 2003;164:1567-87.
  30. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1091-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101
  31. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 2009;4:1073-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.86
  32. Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3812-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg509
  33. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2013;Chapter 7:Unit7.20.
  34. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 2012;6:80-92. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695
  35. Luo W, Cheng D, Chen S, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of meat quality traits in a porcine Large $White{\times}Minzhu$ intercross population. Int J Biol Sci 2012;8:580-95. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.3614
  36. Canovas A, Quintanilla R, Amills M, Pena RN. Muscle transcriptomic profiles in pigs with divergent phenotypes for fatness traits. BMC Genomics 2010;11:372. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-372
  37. Rutkowski JM, Stern JH, Scherer PE. The cell biology of fat expansion. J Cell Biol 2015;208:501-12. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201409063
  38. Wood J, Richardson R, Nute G, et al. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Sci 2004;66:21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6
  39. Kinoshita S, Ogawa W, Okamoto Y, et al. Role of hepatic STAT3 in the regulation of lipid metabolism. Kobe J Med Sci 2008;54:200-8.
  40. Grant R, Boler V, Ridge T, Graves T, Swanson K. Skeletal muscle tissue transcriptome differences in lean and obese female beagle dogs. Anim Genet 2013;44:560-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12035