DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of mass eccentricity on the torsional response of building structures

  • Georgoussis, George K. (Department of Civil Engineering Educators, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE)) ;
  • Mamou, Anna (Department of Civil Engineering Educators, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE))
  • Received : 2018.04.04
  • Accepted : 2018.07.10
  • Published : 2018.09.25

Abstract

The effect of earthquake induced torsion, due to mass eccentricities, is investigated with the objective of providing practical design guidelines for minimizing the torsional response of building structures. Current code provisions recommend performing three dimensional static or dynamic analyses, which involve shifting the centers of the floor masses from their nominal positions to what is called an accidental eccentricity. This procedure however may significantly increase the design cost of multistory buildings, due to the numerous possible spatial combinations of mass eccentricities and it is doubtful whether such a cost would be justifiable. This paper addresses this issue on a theoretical basis and investigates the torsional response of asymmetric multistory buildings in relation to their behavior when all floor masses lie on the same vertical line. This approach provides an insight on the overall seismic response of buildings and reveals how the torsional response of a structure is influenced by an arbitrary spatial combination of mass eccentricities. It also provides practical guidelines of how a structural configuration may be designed to sustain minor torsion, which is the main objective of any practicing engineer. A parametric study is presented on 9-story common building types having a mixed-type lateral load resisting system (frames, walls, coupled wall bents) and representative heightwise variations of accidental eccentricities.

Keywords

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Kyrkos, M.T. and Stathopoulos, K.G. (2015a), "Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: Critical review and state of the art", Earthq. Struct., 8(2), 305-377. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305
  2. Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Kyrkos, M.T., Papalymperi, A. and Plevri, E. (2015b), "Should accidental eccentricity be eliminated from Eurocode 8?", Earthq. Struct., 8(2), 463-484. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.463
  3. ASCE. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA: 2010.
  4. Basu, D. and Jain, S.K. (2007), "Alternative method to locate center of rigidity in asymmetric buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36, 965-973. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.658
  5. Basu, D., Constantinou, M.C. and Whittaker, A.S. (2014), "An equivalent accidental eccentricity to account for the effects of torsional ground motion on structures", Eng. Struct., 69, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.038
  6. Bosco, M., Ferrara, G.A.F., Ghersi, A., Marino, E.M. and Rossi, P.P. (2015), "Seismic assessment of existing r.c. framed structures with in-plan irregularity by nonlinear static methods", Earthq. Struct., 8(2), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.401
  7. Bosco, M., Ghersi, A., Marino, E.M. and Rossi, P.P. (2017), "Generalized corrective eccentricities for nonlinear static analysis of buildings with framed or braced structure", Bullet. Earthq. Eng.
  8. Cheung, V.W.T. and Tso, W.K. (1986), "Eccentricity in irregular multi-story building", Can. J. Civil Eng., 13, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1139/l86-007
  9. Chopra, A.K. (2008), Dynamics of Structures, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, U.S.A.
  10. De-La-Colina, J., Gonzalez, J.V. and Perez, C.A.G. (2013), "Experiments to study the effects of foundation rotation on the seismic building torsional response of a reinforced concrete space frame", Eng. Struct., 56, 1154-1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.005
  11. De-La-Llera, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (1994a), "Accidental torsion in buildings due to stiffness uncertainties", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230202
  12. De-La-Llera, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (1994b), "Using accidental eccentricity in code specified static and dynamic analyses of buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230903
  13. De-La-Llera, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (1995), "Estimation of accidental torsion effects for seismic design of buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 121(1), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:1(102)
  14. EAK-2000 Greek Aseismic Code (2000), Greek Ministry of Environment, City Planning and Public Works, Greece.
  15. EC-8/2004 Eurocode 8 (2004), Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, European Standard EN/1998.
  16. Georgoussis, G.K. (2010), "Modal rigidity center: Its use for assessing elastic torsion in asymmetric buildings", Earthq. Struct., 1(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.2.163
  17. Georgoussis, G.K. (2014), "Modified seismic analysis of multistory asymmetric elastic buildings and suggestions for minimizing the rotational response", Earthq. Struct., 7(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.1.039
  18. Georgoussis, G.K. (2015), "Minimizing the torsional response of inelastic multistory buildings with simple eccentricity", Can. Civil Eng., 42(11), 966-969. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0091
  19. Georgoussis, G.K. (2016), "An approach for minimum rotational response of medium-rise asymmetric structures under seismic excitations", Adv. Struct. Eng., 19(3), 420-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216630049
  20. Georgoussis, G.K. (2017), "Locating optimum torsion axis in asymmetric buildings subjected to seismic excitation", Proceedings ICE.
  21. Makarios, T. and Anastassiadis, K. (1998a), "Real and fictitious elastic axis of multi-storey buildings: Theory", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 7(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199803)7:1<33::AID-TAL95>3.0.CO;2-D
  22. Makarios, T. and Anastassiadis, K. (1998b), "Real and fictitious elastic axis of multi-storey buildings: Applications", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 7(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199803)7:1<57::AID-TAL96>3.0.CO;2-0
  23. Marino, E.M. and Rossi, P.P. (2004), "Exact evaluation of the location of the optimum torsion axis", Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build., 13, 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.252
  24. Newmark, N.M. and Rosenblueth, E. (1971), Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, U.S.A.
  25. Sheikhabadi, M.R.F. (2014), "Simplified relations for the application of rotational components to seismic design codes", Eng. Struct., 59, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.035
  26. Stathopoulos, K.G. and Anagnostopoulos, S.A. (2010), "Accidental design eccentricity: Is it important for the inelastic response of buildings to strong earthquakes?", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(9), 782-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.12.018
  27. Wolff, E.D., Ipek, C., Constantinou, M.C. and Morillas, L. (2014), "Torsional response of seismic isolated structures revisited", Eng. Struct., 59, 462-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.017