대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

담론 분석을 통한 건축계 표절 관련 쟁점 도출

Addressing the issues on Architectural Plagiarism through the Analysis of Discourses

  • 김영선 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과) ;
  • 최재필 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.03.14
  • 심사 : 2019.12.09
  • 발행 : 2019.12.27
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to address the Issues on Architectural Plagiarism through the analysis of the discourses written in texts form. This study selected 60 texts of 20 suspected pairs of architectural plagiarism to derive key-words and key-passages to understand the Issues on Architectural Plagiarism. As a result, the Issues on Architectural Plagiarism are categorized into six different topics; Prototype, Archetype, Motif, Expression of Idea, Commodification, and Westernized-modernization. Meanwhile, the six issues were not discussed independently, but several issues were considered simultaneously in individual cases. This study is the first step to establish the objective guideline to judge Architectural Plagiarism and to be a basis in Architectural Plagiarism research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ames, N. (2014). Building The Gate, Retrieved January 14, 2019 from https://www.middleeastarchitect.com/insight/building-the-gate
  2. Bosker, B. (2013). Original Copies: Architectural Mimicry in Contemporary China. 1st ed., Honolulu, University of Hawai'i Press.
  3. Chung, H. (2009). The culture of plagiarism and ethixs of writing. 1st ed., Busan, Sanzini Book, 10-19.
  4. Cohen, S. (2005). A tale of two houses: the all-glass masterworks by Philip Johnson and Mies van der Rohe are less connected than they seem, Retrieved January 15, 2019 from https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?v=2.1&it=r&sw=w&id=GALE%7CA132120688&prodId=AONE&sid=googleScholarFullText&userGroupName=82sookmyung
  5. Fairs, M. (2013). Zaha Hadid building pirated in China, Retrieved January 8, 2019 from https://www.dezeen.com/2013/01/02/zaha-hadid-building-pirated-in-china/
  6. Giovannini, J. (1987). Johnson and His Glass House: Reflections, Retrieved January 15, 2019 from https://www.nytimes.com/1987/07/16/garden/johnson-and-his-glass-house-reflections.html
  7. Gray, C. (1997). Streetscapes/The Beresford, the San Remo, the Majestic, the El Dorado, the Century; Namesake Precursors of Central Park West's Towers, Retrieved January 21, 2019 from https://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/14/realestate/streetscapesberesford-san-remo-majestic-el-dorado-century-namesake-precursors.html
  8. Ha, E. (2018). A study on the creative design approach of imitation and appropriation, Korea Science and Art Forum, 35, 473-483. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2018.09.30.473
  9. Hill, J. (2017). Is 1WTC a Copycat Design?, Retrieved November 1, 2019 from https://www.world-architects.com/en/architecture-news/headlines/is-1wtc-a-copycat-design
  10. Holowka, D. (2009). The Farnsworth House, part 1: whose less is more?, Retrieved January 15, 2019 from https://www.architakes.com/?p=2097
  11. Hong, S. (2008). A Legal Study on the Standard of Judgment on The Copyright Infringement of Cinematographic Works, The Institute for Legal Studies, Inha University, 11(2), 85-109.
  12. Inbar, E. (2013). Zaha Hadid And the morphology of the "aggressive snake motif", Retrieved January 22, 2019 from https://archidialog.com/2012/06/08/zaha-hadid-andthe-morphology-of-the-aggressive-snake-motif/
  13. Khaled, A. (2012). No wonder Singapore is a model for other cities, Retrieved January 14, 2019 from https://www.thenational.ae/no-wonder-singapore-is-a-model-for-other-cities-1.368451?videoId=5771275459001
  14. Kim, H., Cho, H., Lee, S., & Ko, E. (2018). Kim chung-up Dialogue. 1st ed., Paju, Youlhwadang, 210, 313-315.
  15. Kim, J. (2009). The Reenactment of the National Theater of Myeong-dong: The Poor Nortel Girder of Our Times. Wide, 8, 66-72.
  16. Kim, J. (2014). Observing Korean Modern Architecture through the Writings and Projects of Architects. Space, 563, 52-77.
  17. Korea Institute of Design Promotion(2013). Did bjarke ingels plagiarize?, Retrieved February 25, 2019 from http://www.designdb.com/?menuno=680&bbsno=20934&act=view&ztag=rO0ABXQANzxjYWxsIHR5cGU9ImJvYXJkIiBubz0iNTg1IiBza2luPSJwaG90b19uYXRpb24iPjwvY2FsbD4%3D
  18. Lee, S. (2007). Controversy over Claims to Use 'Gyeongju Tower' Design, Retrieved January 21, 2019 from http://d.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=1428487
  19. Moon, H. (2006). A study of copyright issues in the architectural design area: focused on the u.s. architectural works copyright cases, Copyright Quarterly, 19(4), 102-125.
  20. Nam, H. (2015). Theory of plagiarism. 1st ed., Seoul, Heyinamsa, 47-52.
  21. Nam, H. (2016). Law and the Arts, Journal of Korea Information law, 20(2), 31-68.
  22. Ng, J. (2007). Who Owns Architecture? Copyright and the Freedom Tower Controversy, Retrieved January 14, 2019 from https://morningsidereview.org/essay/who-owns-architecture-copyright-and-the-freedom-tower-controversy/
  23. Peterson, S. (2014). Milan 'Supertree' Prompts Claims of Architectural Plagiarism, Retrieved January 22, 2019 from https://www.curbed.com/2014/12/9/10013858/marcobalich-wilkinson-eyre-supertree-plagiarism
  24. Posner, R. (2007). The Little Book about Plagiarism. 1st ed., New York, Pantheon Books. 65, 105.
  25. Space(2012). An insult to the symbol of an expo with hasteful changes, short preparation and issue of plagiarism, Retrieved February 25, 2019 from http://old.vmspace.com/2008_re/kor/popup/print_page.asp?cate=AR&idx=11659
  26. Tata Steel(2011). Liverpool Museum vs MAXXI - haven't I seen you somewhere before?, Retrieved January 22, 2019 from https://blog.tatasteelconstruction.com/liverpoolmuseum-vs-maxxi-havent-i-seen-you-somewhere-before/
  27. Van, T. (2015). Is Hanoi Museum too similar to foreign museums?, Retrieved January 1, 2019 from https://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/art-entertainment/139276/is-hanoi-museum-too-similar-to-foreign-museums-.html