DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pseudo seismic and static stability analysis of the Torul Dam

  • Karabulut, Muhammet (Department of Civil Engineering, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University) ;
  • Genis, Melih (Department of Mining Engineering, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University)
  • Received : 2018.10.16
  • Accepted : 2019.01.22
  • Published : 2019.02.10

Abstract

Dams have a great importance on energy and irrigation. Dams must be evaluated statically and dynamically even after construction. For this purpose, Torul dam built between years 2000 and 2007 Harsit River in Gümüşhane province, Turkey, is selected as an application. The Torul dam has 137 m height and 322 GWh annual energy production capacity. Torul dam is a kind of concrete face rock fill dam (CFRD). In this study, static and pseudo seismic stability of Torul dam was investigated using finite element method. Torul dam model is constituted by numerical stress analysis named Phase2 which is based on finite element method. The dam was examined under 11 different water filling levels. Thirteenth stage of the numerical model is corresponding full reservoir condition which water filled up under crest line. Besides, pseudo static coefficients for dynamic condition applied to the dam in fourteenth stage of the model. Stability assessment of the Torul dam has been discussed according to the displacement throughout the dam body. For static and pseudo seismic cases, the displacements in the dam body have been compared. The total displacements of the dam according to its the empty state increase dramatically at the height of the water level of about 70 m and above. Compared to the pseudo-seismic analysis, the displacement of dam at the full reservoir condition is approximately two times as high as static analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Cooke, J.B. (1984), "Progress in rockfill dams", J. Geotech. Eng., 110(10), 1383-1414. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:10(1381)
  2. Cooke, J.B. and Sherard, J.L. (1987), "Concrete face rockfill dam: Assessment; II. Design", J. Geotech. Eng., 113(10), 1113-1132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:10(1113)
  3. Dakoulas, P. and Gazetas, G. (1986), "Seismic shear strains and seismic coefficients in dams and embankments", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 5(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(86)90001-1
  4. DSI (2018), General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works of Turkey, .
  5. Fan, W, Cao, P., Zhang, K., Li, K. and Chen, C. (2015), "Stability assessment and optimization design of lakeside open-pit slope considering fluid-solid coupling effect", Math. Prob. Eng.
  6. Hynes-Griffin, M.E. and Franklin, A.G. (1984), "Rationalizing the seismic coefficient method", Miscellaneous Paper GL-84-13, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, U.S.A.
  7. IITK-GSDMA (2007), "Guidelines for seismic design of earth dams and embankments", Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority Gandhinagar.
  8. Kartal, M.E. (2010), "Reliability analysis of concrete-faced rockfill dams considering geometrically and materially nonlinear response", Ph.D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish).
  9. Marcuson, W.F. (1981), "Moderator's report for session on Earth dams and stability of slopes under dynamic loads", Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
  10. Nadi, B., Askari, F. and Farzaneh, O. (2014), "Seismic performance of slopes in pseudo-staticdesigns with different safety factors", Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng., 38(C2), 465-483.
  11. Raksiri, S., Pornthap, P., Pornkasem, J., Warat, K. and Pitthaya, J. (2018), "Deformation analysis of high CFRD considering the scaling effects", Geomech. Eng., 14(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.12989/GAE.2018.14.3.211
  12. Rocscience (2007), Phase2 (ver.8) User Manuel, Toronto, Canada, .
  13. Rodriguez, R.F., Nicieza, C.G., Gayarre, F.L. and Lopez, F.R. (2015), "Application of hydraulic cylinder testing to determine the geotechnical properties of earth-filled dams", Geomech. Eng., 9(4), 483-498. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.4.483
  14. Seed, H.B. (1979), "Considerations in the earthquake resistant design of earth and rockfill dams", Geotechnique, 29(3), 215-263. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.3.215
  15. Seed, H.B. and Martin, G.R. (1966), "The seismic coefficient in earth dam design", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., (92), 25-58.
  16. Steven, L.K. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.
  17. Terzaghi, K. (1950), Mechanisms of Landslides, Engineering Geology (Berkey) Volume, Geological Society of America.
  18. Terzi, N.U. and Selcuk, M.E. (2015), "Nonlinear dynamic behavior of Pamukcay Earthfill Dam", Geomech. Eng., 9(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.1.083
  19. Uddin, N. (1999), "A dynamic analysis procedure for concretefaced rockfill dams subjected to strong seismic excitation", Comput. Struct., 72(1-3), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00011-5
  20. Wieland, M. and Brenner, R.P. (2007), Seismic Performance of CFRDs, International Water Power & Dam Construction, March.
  21. Zeinab, M., Akbarpour A., Khatibinia, M. and Siuki, A.K. (2015), "Optimal design of homogeneous earth dams by particle swarm optimization incorporating support vector machine approach", Geomech. Eng., 9(6), 709-727. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.6.709
  22. Zhou, W., Li, S.L., Ma, G., Chang, X.L., Cheng, Y.G. and Ma, X. (2016), "Assessment of the crest cracks of the Pubugou rockfill dam based on parameters back analysis", Geomech. Eng., 11(4), 571-585. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.11.4.571

Cited by

  1. Seismic response analysis of embankment dams under decomposed earthquakes vol.21, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.1.035
  2. Seismic fragility analysis of a cemented Sand-gravel dam considering two failure modes vol.26, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.26.6.483