대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

  • 제35권3호
  • /
  • Pages.59-66
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-9093(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-177X(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

보행자를 위한 권장 경사의 경사로와 계단의 선호도 비교분석

A Comparative Analysis of Preference for Pedestrian Ramp on Recommended Angle of Slop and Stairs

  • Park, Changbae (Department of Architecture, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.10
  • 심사 : 2019.03.16
  • 발행 : 2019.03.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In recent years, urban regeneration is focused on smart and pedestrian oriented development utilizing various mobility technology. The characteristics of walkways needs to reflect such development orientations. This research is the first step to find an adequate slope for ramp replacing stairs and shared by pedestrians, personal mobilities and powered wheelchairs. It aims to check if ramps on a recommended degree of angle by general guidelines are more preferred than stairs and find out what make difference of such preferences. Two surveys were conducted at $9^{\circ}$ and $9.6^{\circ}$ ramps coexisted with stairs at sequential and parallel location. The study on the survey result found that the general evaluation of $9^{\circ}$ ramp was better than $9.6^{\circ}$ ramp but $9^{\circ}$ ramp was not preferred than stairs while $9.6^{\circ}$ ramps was preferred. The difference of preferences was related to characteristics of stairs. The stair with shorter tread and riser next to $9^{\circ}$ ramp was evaluated much better than stairs next to $9.6^{\circ}$ ramp. Therefore the research concludes that $10.0^{\circ}$ which many guidelines recommend for the maximum slop of a ramp was not adequate for a ramp to replace stairs as a preferred means of vertical circulation. In addition the research found that the preference was sensitive to moving direction and gender especially in regards to comfort of stairs and safety of ramp. Most pedestrians chose a means of vertical circulation based on its comfort but pedestrian's evaluation of safety was most different based on moving direction.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 부산대학교

참고문헌

  1. Allen, E. (2005). How buildings work: the natural order of architecture: Oxford University Press.
  2. Alread, J., Leslie, T., Whitehead, R., Alread, J., Leslie, T., & Whitehead, R. (2014). Design-tech: Building science for architects, 2nd edition.
  3. Bentham, J., Cesare, M., Stevens, G. A., Zhou, B., Bixby, H., & Cowan, M. (2016). A century of trends in adult human height. Elife, 5.
  4. Bohannon, R. W., & Andrews, A. W. (2011). Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 97(3), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004
  5. Bosina, E., & Weidmann, U. (2017). Estimating pedestrian speed using aggregated literature data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 468, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.09.044
  6. Browning, R. C., Baker, E. A., Herron, J. A., & Kram, R. (2006). Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. Journal of Applied Physiology, 100(2), 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00767.2005
  7. Dreyfuss, H. (1967). The measure of man: human factors in design: Whitney Library of Design New York.
  8. Han J., Cho, J., & Bae, S. (2006). The Spatio-temporal Analysis of Gait Characteristics during Ramp Ascent and Descent at Different Inclinations. The Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy, 18(1), 95-106.
  9. Levine, R. V., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 30(2), 178-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030002003
  10. Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Pick, H. L., & Warren, W. H. (2007). Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Experimental brain research, 181(2), 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0917-0
  11. Neufert, E., & Herz, R. (1970). Architects' data. London: Lockwood.
  12. Ramsey, C. G. (1932). Architectural graphic standards for architects, engineers, decorators, builders and draftsmen. In H. R. Sleeper (Ed.). New York: J. Wiley & sons, inc.
  13. Ramsey, C. G. (1970, 1995). Architectural graphic standards. In H. R. Sleeper (Ed.), (6th, 8th ed.). New York: J. Wiley.
  14. Templer, J. (1995). The staircase: studies of hazards, falls, and safer design: MIT press.
  15. Turner, G., & Collins, B. (1981). Pedestrian movement characteristics on building ramps. Washington, DC
  16. Turner, G., &Collins, B. (1981). Pedestrian movement characteristics on building ramps. U.S. Department of Commerce, Environmental Design Research Division.
  17. U.S. Dept. of Defense, (1995). Handbook for human engineering design guideline. (MIL-HDBK-759C).
  18. U.S. Dept. of Labor. (1983). Health Standards, General Industry,(29 CFR 1910).
  19. Weidmann, U. (1993). Transporttechnik der Fussganger: transporttechnische Eigenschaften des Fusgangerverkehrs, Literaturauswertung. IVT Schriftenreihe, 90.