DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Space Configuration according to the Operation of Residential Welfare Facilities for the Aged

노인주거복지시설의 운영에 따른 공간구성에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Yun-Jin (Dept. of Socail Welfare, Open Cyber University Of Korea)
  • 최윤진 (한국열린사이버대학교 사회복지학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.11
  • Accepted : 2019.03.15
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Korea, which became an aging society in 2000, has made transition to an aged society more quickly than expected since late 2017 after 17 years. Despite this trend, the awareness towards elderly housing facilities has not yet been raised across in society. The primary reason is that use of elderly housing facilities has not been promoted due to lack of understanding about the construction and management of the facilities. The housing of the elderly should be considered in terms of not only residential space but also the issues of medical care and continuous care. Therefore, the trend of elderly housing is pursuing the Continuing Care Retirement Community. Thus, this study analyzed the policies of existing elderly housing facilities and existing elderly housing through comparison with policies and housing of foreign countries. Based on the results, the the government intends to present characteristics and direction of suitable housing design of senior citizens' housing facilities through maintenance of UNIT, securing convergence through changes in the use of facilities, and realising the cost of operation, and studying social welfare measures to cope with the increasing number of elderly residents.

2000년 고령화 사회에 진입한 우리나라는 17년이 지난 2017년말에 예상보다 빠르게 고령사회로 진입하게 되었다. 이러한 추세에 비하여 아직 노인주거시설에 관한 인식은 사회에 정착하지 못하고 있으며, 다양한 이유 중 가장 큰 이유는 시설의 건축과 경영에 대한 이해가 부족하여 노인주거시설의 활성화가 이루어지지 못한 것이라 할 수 있다. 더불어 정부의 정책 또한 뒷받침을 하지 못하는 면도 무시할 수 없다. 노인의 주거는 단순한 주거 공간 뿐 만이 아니라 의료의 문제와 연관지어서 생각해야 한다는 점과 지속적인 케어의 문제를 함께 고려해야 한다. 그래서 노인주거의 추세는 연속보호형 시설(Continuing Care Retirement Commuity)을 추구하고 있다고 할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 기존의 노인주거시설의 정책과 기존 노인주거를 외국의 정책 및 주거와의 비교를 통하여 분석한다. 이 결과를 바탕으로 노인주거시설의 운영을 중심으로 경제적 부담을 최소화하기 위해 기본UNIT의 유지, 시설의 용도변경을 통한 융통성의 확보, 공용공간의 쉐어, 운영비의 현실화 등을 통해 노인주거시설의 적합한 주거디자인의 유형의 특성과 방향성을 제시하고 증가하는 노인인구에 대처할 수 있는 사회복지적 방안을 연구함에 의의를 두고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gwon Oh-Jeong. (2012). A Study on Current Housing Facilities for the Elderly Generations & the Elderly Housing Alternative, Financial Planning Review, Issue 2(5), 67-69.
  2. Korea Law Information Center, (October 1, 2017). WELFARE OF THE AGED ACT. Retrieved from http://www.law.go.kr
  3. CEO REPORT 2012-no.6 (2012). In the aging society, the housing market changes. CEO REPORT 2012 no.6 p.3.
  4. J.H. Lee, (2017). A Study on the Developmentof Elderly Housing Models for Ultra-AgedSociety, (Ph.D. Konkuk University).
  5. KRIHS POLICY Brief (2012). Direction ofHousing Policy for the Elderly. no.383. p5.
  6. Cho, Cheol-Ho. (2010). The research regarding the community residential welfare facilities for the Aged, Korean institute of interior design journal 19(2), 229-230.
  7. Chu Hyeon-Gyeong, (2012). A Study on the Housing Welfare Legislation System in Each Country: Germany(Focusing on the Elderly Housing Welfare Legislation System). Korea Legislation Research Institute, Gobal JR12 02, p.31, p87.
  8. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, (2014). "Analysis of Current Elderly Welfare Policy Enforcement System and Measures for Improvement", Policy Report 2014, p.11.
  9. Kim Seon-Ja, (2010). Strategy for Transformation of Seoul into An Elderly-Friendly City. SDI Policy Report 2010. p.4
  10. Lee Yeo-Sook, Yoo Seon-Jong, Kim Byeong-Ryang, (2013). "A Study Investigating the Effect of Elderly Welfare Housing Characteristic Elements on the Prices for Moving In", Housing Research, Issue 1, Vol. 21. 141-145.
  11. Ahn Joon-Yeong, Oh Dong-Hoon, (2011). A Study on Housing Environmental Characteristics of Elderly Housing: Focusing on the Elderly Welfare Housing in Seoul. Housing Research, Issue 3, Vol. 19, p.181.
  12. Seoul Institute (2015). Housing Status of Seoul Citizens
  13. Do Joo-Eun, Yoo Seon-Jong, (2014). A Study on Characteristics of Monthly Payment for Service Type Elderly Housing In Japan. Real Estate Research, Issue 3, Vol. 24, p.128.
  14. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (May 26, 2011). Press Release
  15. C. H. Park, (2016). A Study on the Status of Elderly Welfare Housing (M.S. Yonsei University)
  16. Song Joon-Ho, (2012). A Study on the Scale of Auxiliary Facilities of Urban Type Elderly Welfare Housing. Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 279 p.132.
  17. S. E. Jeong, (2016). A Study on the Community Space of Urban Elderly Welfare Housing from the Standpoint of Aging in Place (M.S. Hongik University)
  18. Busan Institute of Social Welfare Development (2015) A Study on Development of Guideline on Elderly-Friendly City. Busan, 5 p.11
  19. Kim Yeong-Hye, (2011). Why Are Elderly-Friendly Cities Pursued Gyeonggi Family & Women's Research Institute, Issue Brief, December, 2011, Issue 36, p.1
  20. Gyeonggi Welfare Foundation (2015). A Study on Community-Oriented Elderly Housing Protection System(Focusing on Cases of the United States). p.63.
  21. Kim Soo-Jung, (2017). Analysis of Facility Stand For Elderly Welfare Facility BY Universal Design Priciple and Guideline. The Journal of Industrial Convergence, 15(1),1-7.