Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of adaptation time and inclusion level of sugar beet pulp on nutrient digestibility and evaluation of ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs

  • Zhang, Ze Yu (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Shuai (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Lai, Chang Hua (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhao, Jin Biao (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zang, Jian Jun (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Huang, Cheng Fei (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2018.02.28
  • Accepted : 2018.07.31
  • Published : 2019.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of adaptation time and inclusion level of sugar beet pulp (SBP) on nutrient digestibility and to evaluate the ileal amino acid digestibility of SBP fed to pigs. Methods: In Exp. 1, thirty-six crossbred barrows ($85.0{\pm}2.1kg$) were allotted to 6 diets in a completely randomized design with six replicates per diet. Diets included a corn-soybean meal diet and 5 test diets containing 14.6%, 24.4%, 34.2%, 43.9%, or 53.7% SBP, respectively. The adaptation time consisted 7, 14, 21, or 28 d consecutively for each pig followed by 5 d for fecal collection. Feces were collected from d 8 to 13, d 15 to 20, d 22 to 27, and d 29 to 34, respectively. In Exp. 2, six pigs ($35.1{\pm}1.7kg$) with T-cannulas at the terminal ileum were fed to 3 diets in a replicated $3{\times}3$ Latin square design with 3 periods and 2 replicate pigs per diet. Each period consisted 5 d for diet adaptation followed by 2 d for digesta collection. Results: The digestible energy (DE) value and the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of gross energy (GE), dry matter (DM), ash, and organic matter in diets linearly decreased (p<0.05) as the adaptation time increased or as the dietary SBP increased, while the ATTD of neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre in diets linearly increased (p<0.01) as the dietary SBP increased. The DE value and the ATTD of GE and crude protein (CP) in SBP linearly increased (p<0.05) as the adaptation time increased, while the ATTD of CP in SBP linearly decreased (p<0.01) as the inclusion level increased. The standardized ileal digestibility of Lys, Met, Thr, and Trp in SBP was 37.03%, 51.62%, 40.68%, and 46.22%, respectively. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that the ATTD of energy and nutrients were decreased as inclusion rate of SBP increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Chiba LI. Sustainable swine nutrition. In: Urriola PE, Cervantes-Pahm SK, Stein HH, editors. Fiber in swine nutrition. 1st ed. Ames, IA, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Publication; 2013. 260 p.
  2. Yen JT, Nienaber JA, Klindt J, Crouse DJ. Effect of ractopamine on growth, carcass traits, and fasting heat production of U.S. contemporary crossbred and Chinese Meishan pure- and crossbred pigs. J Anim Sci 1991;69:4810-22. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69124810x
  3. McBurney MI, Sauer WC. Fiber and large bowel energy absorption: validation of the integrated ileostomy-fermentation model using pigs. J Nutr 1993;123:721-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/123.4.721
  4. Adesehinwa AOK. Energy and protein requirements of pigs and the utilization of fibrous feedstuffs in Nigeria: A review. Afr J Biotechnol 2008;7:4798-806.
  5. Andersson C, Lindberg JE. Forages in diets for growing pigs 1. Nutrient apparent digestibilities and partition of nutrient digestion in barley-based diets including lucerne and whiteclover meal. Anim Sci 1997;65:483-91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800008687
  6. Urriola PE, Stein HH. Effects of distillers dried grains with solubles on amino acid, energy, and fiber digestibility and on hindgut fermentation of dietary fiber in a corn-soybean meal diet fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2010;88:1454-62. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2162
  7. Huang Q, Piao XS, Liu L, Li DF. Effects of inclusion level on nutrient digestibility and energy content of wheat middlings and soya bean meal for growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr 2013;67:356-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2013.837233
  8. Longland AC, Low AG, Quelch DB, Bray SP. Adaptation to the digestion of non-starch polysaccharide in growing pigs fed on cereal or semi-purified basal diets. Br J Nutr 1993;70:557-66. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19930148
  9. Noblet J, Le Goff G. Effect of dietary fiber on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001;90:35-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00195-X
  10. Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Kemp B, den Hartog LA, Schrama JW, Verstegen MWA. Adaptation to the digestion of nutrients of a starch diet or a non-starch polysaccharide diet in grouphoused pregnant sows. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2002;86:414-21. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00398.x
  11. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2012.
  12. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2006.
  13. Thiex NJ, Anderson S, Gildemeister B. Crude fat, diethyl ether extraction, in feed, cereal grain, and forage (Randall/Soxtec/submersion method): collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2003;86:888-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/86.5.888
  14. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  15. Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:917-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02
  16. Stein HH, Shipley CF, Easter RA. Technical note: A technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1433-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651433x
  17. Li PL, Wang FL, Wu F, Wang JR, Liu L, Lai CH. Chemical composition, energy and amino acid digestibility in double-low rapeseed meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015;6:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0033-0
  18. Stein HH, Seve B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CF. Invited review: Amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: Terminology and application. J Anim Sci 2007;85:172-80. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-742
  19. Zhang WJ, Li DF, Liu L, et al. The effects of dietary fiber level on nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2013;4:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-17
  20. Bindelle J, Buldgen A, Delacollette M, et al. Influence of source and concentrations of dietary fiber on in vivo nitrogen excretion pathways in pigs as reflected by in vitro fermentation and nitrogen incorporation by fecal bacteria. J Anim Sci 2009;87:583-93. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0717
  21. Molist F, Gomez de Segura A, Gasa J, et al. Effects of the insoluble and soluble dietary fibre on the physicochemical properties of digesta and microbial activity in early weaned piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009;149:346-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.06.015
  22. Le Gall M, Serena A, Jorgensen H, Theil PK, Bach Knudsen KE. The role of whole-wheat grain and wheat and rye ingredients on the digestion and fermentation processes in the gut- a model experiment with pigs. Br J Nutr 2009;102:1590-600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509990924
  23. Rainbird RM, Thorne JH, Hardy RWF. Role of amides, amino acids, and ureides in the nutrition of developing soybean seeds. Plant Physiol 1984;74:329-34. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.74.2.329
  24. Mata YN, Blazquez ML, Ballester A, Gonzalez F, Munoz JA. Sugar-beet pulp pectin gels as biosorbent for heavy metals: Preparation and determination of biosorption and desorption characteristics. Chem Eng J 2009;150:289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.001
  25. Brunsgaard G, Bach Knudsen KE, Eggum BO. The influence of the period of adaptation on the digestibility of diets containing different types of indigestible polysaccharides in rats. Br J Nutr 1995;74:833-48.
  26. Len NT, Lindberg JE, Ogle B. Digestibility and nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of fibre in local (Mong Cai), F1 (Mong Cai$\times$Yorkshire) and exotic (Landrace$\times$Yorkshire) growing pigs in Vietnam. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2007;91:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00653.x
  27. Jorgensen H, Zhao XQ, Eggum BO. The influence of dietary and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. Br J Nutr 1996;75:365-78. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19960140
  28. Morel PCH, Lee TS, Moughan PJ. Effect of feeding level, live weight and genotype on the apparent faecal digestibility of energy and organic matter in the growing pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006;126:63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.06.006
  29. Le Goff G, Dubois S, van Milgen J, Noblet J. Influence of dietary fibre level on digestive and metabolic utilisation of energy in growing and finishing pigs. Anim Res 2002;51:245-59. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2002019
  30. Huang Q, Su YB, Liu L, Piao XS, Li DF. Effects of inclusion levels of wheat bran and body weight on ileal and fecal digestibility in growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:847-54. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0769
  31. Dikeman CL, Fahey Jr GC. Viscosity as related to dietary fiber: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2006;46:649-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390500511862
  32. Cunningham HM, Friend DW, Nicholson JWG. The effect of age, body weight, feed intake, and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility and nutritive value of cellulose. Can J Anim Sci 1962;42:167-75. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas62-027
  33. Fernandez JA, Jorgensen H, Just A. Comparative digestibility experiments with growing pigs and adult sows. Anim Sci 1986;43:127-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100018419
  34. Lowell JE, Liu Y, Stein HH. Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients in diets fed to sows and growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr 2015;69:79-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2015.1013664
  35. Kass ML, Van Soest PJ, Pond WG, Lewis B, McDowell RE. Utilization of dietary fibre from alfalfa by growing swine. I. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. J Anim Sci 1980;50:175-91. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1980.501175x
  36. Roca-Canudas M, Anguita M, Nofrarias M, et al. Effects of different types of dietary non-digestible carbohydrates on the physico-chemical properties and microbiota of proximal colon digesta of growing pigs. Livest Sci 2007;109:85-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.085
  37. Schulze H, van Leeuwen P, Verstegen MWA, et al. Effect of level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal apparent digestibility and ileal nitrogen losses in pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:2362-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7292362x
  38. Eklund M, Rademacher M, Sauer WC, Blank R, Mosenthin R. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in alfalfa meal, sugar beet pulp, and wheat bran compared to wheat and protein ingredients for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:1037-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6436