DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Refutation against the Non-Scientificity Argument on Korean Medicine

한의학의 비과학성 논란에 대한 반박

  • Chi, Gyoo Yong (Department of Korean Medicine Pathology, College of Korean Medicine, Dongeui University)
  • 지규용 (동의대학교 한의과대학 병리학교실)
  • Received : 2019.09.18
  • Accepted : 2019.10.23
  • Published : 2019.10.25

Abstract

This study is aimed to refute against medical opponent's claim that Korean medicine does not conform to the conditions of science. Analyses and refutations against a journal treatise and a Facebook column formally written for a logical criticism and attack were conducted. As an example of the logic of the knowledge production process in Chinese medicine, 8 principle theory was exemplified in the Han danasty Classics "Neijing" and "Shanghanlun" at first. The knowledge was continuously revised and accumulated historically and then completed through Ming、Cheng period. The differential diagnosis and treatment theory is a logical process of forming knowledge through the process of abduction, deduction and induction begun from "Shanghanlun" succeeded to nowadays and it is essentially equaled with the process of experimental inference by Claude Bernard. Examples of normal science status based on Kuhn's scientific standards include the theory of 8 principle, differntial diagnosis of viscera and bowel, 3 yang and 3 yin diseases of "Shanghanlun" and warm disease theory. Examples of science lost or get its normal status by refutation following Popper's standards were cold damage theory and warm disease theory respectively. This allowed Chinese medicine to follow the general principles of science that form scientific knowledge and to correspond with the demarcation standards and concepts of science. However, as one of the conditions for becoming a science, Chinese medicine is partially lacking in terms of the interpretation of text language or the accordance with modern knowledge. Therefore methods are required to supplement this lack through multi-faceted research such as literature-based, theoretical and clinical studies.

Keywords

References

  1. EDITORIAL, The World Health Organization's decision about traditional Chinese medicine could backfire, Nature 2019;570, 5. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01726-1
  2. David Cyranoski. Why Chinese medicine is heading for clinics around the world, 26 September 2018, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06782-7
  3. Zhang GY. Farewell to Traditional Chinese Medicine and Remedies, Medicine and Philosophy (Humanistic &Social Medicine Edition), Total No. 306. Apr 2006;27(4):14-7.
  4. Yan F, Xu LJ. 120 Fallacies in "Farewell to Traditional Chinese Medicine and Remedies" by Zhang Gongyao, Journal of University of Science and Techology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition) Aug. 2013;29(4):54-68.
  5. Yoo YS. Only when Heo Jun dies does the country live, Goonja Publishing Co., Seoul, 2005.
  6. Lee GS. Medical Associations of Ulsan Metropolitan City, Special Committee on Oriental Medicine held a regional briefing. Medical News, 2019.7.30. http://www.bosa.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=2109852
  7. Jeong JY. Doctors News, 2015.2.9. http://www.doctorsnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=101815
  8. Institute of Science-Centered Medicine and Publications, http://www.i-sbm.org/?1A1a1J
  9. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=462911307829446&id=100023317422222
  10. Yeo IS. Korean medicine, see it as science? Research Institute for Healthcare Policy Korean Medical Association 9(3):70-5.
  11. Hwang SI, http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201403212021105#csidxb773897a666c60ab35cc96bd5aa1210
  12. Leem YW, Kim YS. A Historical Study on the Korean Science Curriculum for the Elementary and Secondary Schools, Biology Education 2013;41(3):483-503. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.3.483
  13. Hong WS, Yoon CY(Ed.). Enlarged History of Chinese Medicine, Iljungsa 2001;86.
  14. Hong WS(Revise). Hwangjenaegyong, Research Institute of Oriental Medicine, Seoul, 1981.
  15. Lee SM. Laozi and Hwang Lao discipline, Sowadang, 2010.
  16. Kim SH. A Study of HwangLaoDao-the origin of thought and the genealogy of the spirit of the times, Journal of The Studies of Taoism and Culture 27:33-72.
  17. Moon JG. A study on development of yinyang and 5 phases theory I, Age and Philosophy 1989;14:21-70.
  18. Shen JW, Wu M. To correctly read "Shanghanlun" and "Synopsis of the Golden Chamber", clearing up the historical background and academic origin is required first. Forum on Traditional Chinese Medicine 2017;32(4):1-4.
  19. Xu BL. Briefly on Xu Shuwei's Academic Thought, Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2005;25(1):28-9. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-5028.2005.01.013
  20. Chen YC, Ma FQ, Bai Y. Orthodox New Zhejiang Shanghan science School, Zhejiang J Tradit Chin Med 2018;53(05):313-5.
  21. Chang X. Each Dialectical Method History, Theory and Practice Significance, Heirongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Master's Thesis 2008;13-21.
  22. Kou ZS. Elucidation of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing Commercial Press, 1956;6.
  23. Sun YQ. Complete Works of Red water and Black pearl. Beijing people's medical publishing house, 1986;16.
  24. The State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine promulgated protective plan against SARS by Traditional Chinese Medicine, Modern Seed Industry 2003;24(3):55.
  25. Yuk SW, Lee KG, Yu YC, A study on the Pyung Yin Jeol Gok of the Young Chu, J. Soc. Kor Med Diag. 1998;2(2):6-20.
  26. Claude Bernard, Henry Copley Greene, A. M.(Trans), An Introduction To The Study of Experimental Medicine, Henry Schuman, Inc. 1949, p. 24, 63, 98-9. (2014 Internet Archive) https://archive.org/details/b21270557/page/24
  27. Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality, Corrected edition, David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne, The Free Press, New York, 1978. Internet Archive. https://archive.org/stream/AlfredNorthWhiteheadProcessAndReality/
  28. Sattler, R. "Process morphology: structural dynamics in development and evolution". Canadian Journal of Botany 1992;70:708-14. https://doi.org/10.1139/b92-091
  29. Charles Sanders Peirce, Collected Paper. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1982;5:172.