Computers and Concrete

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental and numerical investigation on bearing mechanism and capacity of new concrete plug structures

  • Weng, Yonghong (Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research) ;
  • Huang, Shuling (Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of the Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute) ;
  • Xu, Tangjin (Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research) ;
  • Zhang, Yuting (Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of the Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute)
  • Received : 2019.05.26
  • Accepted : 2019.10.23
  • Published : 2019.11.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The stability and safety of concrete plug structure of diversion tunnel is crucial for the impoundment of upstream reservoir in hydropower projects. The ongoing Wudongde hydropower plant in China plans to adopt straight column plugs and curved column plugs to replace the traditional expanded wedge-shaped plugs. The performance of the proposed new plug structures under high water head is then a critical issue and attracts the attentions of engineers. This paper firstly studied the joint bearing mechanism of plug and surrounding rock mass and found that the quality and mechanical properties of the interfaces among plug concrete, shotcrete, and surrounding rock mass play a key role in the performance of plug structures. By performing geophysical and mechanical experiments, the contact state and the mechanical parameters of the interfaces were analyzed in detail and provide numerical analysis with rational input parameters. The safety evaluation is carried out through numerical calculation of plug stability under both construction and operation period. The results indicate that the allowable water head acting on columnar plugs is 3.1 to 7.4 times of the designed water head. So the stability of the new plug structure meets the design code requirement. Based on above findings, it is concluded that for the studied project, it is feasible to adopt columnar plugs to replace the traditional expanded wedge-shaped plugs. It is hoped that this study can provide reference for other projects with similar engineering background and problems.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Central Research Institutes of Public Causes

References

  1. Bu, J., Chen, X., Liu, S., Li, S. and Shen, N. (2018), "Experimental study on the dynamic behavior of pervious concrete for permeable pavement", Comput. Concrete, 22(3), 291-303. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.3.291.
  2. Dong, Z.H., Ding, X.L., Ye, S.Y., Wu, Y.J. and Fu, J. (2011), "Analysis on stability of diversion tunnel plug of large-scale hydropower engineering", J. Yangtze River Sci. Res. Inst., 28(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2011.02.009
  3. Ebrahimi, M., Hedayat, A.A. and Fakhrabadi, H. (2018), "Selecting optimized concrete structure by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)", Comput. Concrete, 22(3), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.3.327.
  4. Falamarz-Sheikhabadi, M.R. and Zerva, A. (2017), "Analytical seismic assessment of a tall long-span curved reinforcedconcrete bridge. Part I: numerical modeling and input excitation", J. Earthq. Eng., 21(8), 1305-1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1211565.
  5. Gan, W.X. (2000), "Discussions on several issues of diversion tunnel design", Des. Hydroelec. Power Stat., 16(4), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-9805.2000.04.007
  6. Gan, W.X. (2001), "Discussion on design of the plug for hydraulic tunnels", Yangtze River, 21(5), 34-36.
  7. Gharehbaghi, S. (2018), "Damage controlled optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete framed structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 65(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.1.053.
  8. hang, Y., Ding, X., Huang, S., Qin, Y., Li, P. and Li, Y. (2018), "Field measurement and numerical simulation of excavation damaged zone in a 2000 m-deep cavern", Geomech. Eng., 16(4), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.16.4.399.
  9. Hashemi, A. and Mosalam, K.M. (2006), "Shake‐table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(14), 1827-1852. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.612.
  10. Heidari, A., Keikha, R., Haghighi, M.S. and Hosseinabadi, H. (2018), "Numerical study for vibration response of concrete beams reinforced by nanoparticles", Struct. Eng. Mech., 67(3), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.3.311.
  11. Huang, J. (2016) Online material at http://www.sohu.com/a/259742764_100122963
  12. Kim, G.J. and Kwak, H.G. (2017), "Depth-dependent evaluation of residual material properties of fire-damaged concrete", Comput. Concrete, 20(4), 503-509. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.4.503.
  13. Lv, X.J., Cao, M.L., Li, Y., Li, X., Li, Q., Tang, R., Wang, Q. and Duan, Y.P. (2015), "A new absorbing foam concrete: preparation and microwave absorbing properties", Adv. Concrete Constr., 3(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2015.3.2.103.
  14. Mao, L., Barnett, S., Begg, D., Schleyer, G. and Wight, G. (2014), "Numerical simulation of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete panel subjected to blast loading", Int. J. Impact Eng., 64, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.10.003.
  15. Nguyen, X.H. and Nguyen, H.C. (2016), "Seismic behavior of non-seismically designed reinforced concrete frame structure", Earthq. Struct., 11(2), 281-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.281.
  16. Tang, K., Millard, S. and Beattie, G. (2015), "Technical and economical feasibility of using GGBS in long-span concrete structures", Adv. Concrete Constr., 3(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/acc.2015.3.1.1.
  17. The National Standards Compilation Group of the People's Republic of China (2015), "Standard for engineering classification of rock masses (GB/T50218-2014)", China Planning Press, Beijing.
  18. The Standard Compilation Group of the National Energy Administration of People's Republic of China (2014), "Design code for concrete gravity dam (NB/T 35026-2014)", China Electric Power Press, Beijing.
  19. The Standards Compilation Group of the Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China (2016), "Specification for design of hydraulic tunnel (SL279-2016)", China Water and Power Press, Beijing.
  20. Yan, J.B., Liew, J.R., Zhang, M.H. and Sohel, K.M.A. (2015), "Experimental and analytical study on ultimate strength behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite beam structures", Mater. Struct., 48(5), 1523-1544. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0252-4.
  21. Yang, J.A. and Guo, H.Y. (2008), "Structure and stability analysis of diversion tunnel plug for Laxiwa hydropower station", Power Syst. Clean Energy, 24(11), 71-75.
  22. Yang, J.A., Wu, H.G., Su, K., Shi, Q.C. and Song, Y.B. (2007), "Structure and stability analysis of diversion tunnel plug for large scale hydropower station", Water Resour. Power, 25(1), 94-97.
  23. Yin, D.S., Wang, W.M. and Wang, S.F. (2008), "Plug shape optimization of diversion tunnels of Shuibuya project", Eng. J. Wuhan Univ., 41(3), 68-71.
  24. Zhang, Z.L. and Zou, Q. (2002), "Design practices for the plug structure of diversion tunnels at Tianshengqiao No. 1 Hydropower plant", Water Power, 1, 30-32.