DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a knowledge-based medical expert system to infer supportive treatment suggestions for pediatric patients

  • Ertugrul, Duygu Celik (Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University) ;
  • Ulusoy, Ali Hakan (Department of Information Technology, School of Computing and Technology, Eastern Mediterranean University)
  • Received : 2018.08.09
  • Accepted : 2019.04.28
  • Published : 2019.08.02

Abstract

This paper discusses the design, implementation, and potential use of an ontology-based mobile pediatric consultation and monitoring system, which is a smart healthcare expert system for pediatric patients. The proposed system provides remote consultation and monitoring of pediatric patients during their illness at places distant from medical service areas. The system not only shares instant medical data with a pediatrician but also examines the data as a smart medical assistant to detect any emergency situation. In addition, it uses an inference engine to infer instant suggestions for performing certain initial medical treatment steps when necessary. The applied methodologies and main technical contributions have three aspects: (a) pediatric consultation and monitoring ontology, (b) semantic Web rule knowledge base, and (c) inference engine. Two case studies with real pediatric patients are provided and discussed. The reported results of the applied case studies are promising, and they demonstrate the applicability, effectiveness, and efficiency of the proposed approach.

Keywords

References

  1. S. A. Madhi and K. P. Klugman, Acute respiratory infections. Disease and mortality in sub‐Saharan Africa. 2nd edition (Jamison DT et al., eds.), Chapter 11, Washington DC, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 2006.
  2. R. C. Merrell and C. R. Doarn, m‐Health, Telemedicine J. E‐Health 20 (2014), 99-101. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.9997
  3. M. T. Baysari and J. I. Westbrook, Mobile applications for patient‐centered care coordination: a review of human factors methods applied to their design, development, and evaluation, Yearbook Medical Inf. 10 (2015), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2015-011
  4. E. Alepis and C. Lambrinidis, M‐health: supporting automated diagnosis and electronic health records, SpringerPlus 2 (2013), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-103
  5. N. Mohammadzadeh and R. Safdari, Patient monitoring in mobile health: opportunities and challenges, Medical Archives 68 (2014), 57-60. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.57-60
  6. S. Shridevi, V. Viswanathan, and B. Saleena Ontology‐driven decision support systems for health care, Knowledge Computing and its Applications, Springer, Singapore, 2018, 65-86.
  7. H. Yin et al., Smart Healthcare, Foundations Trends(R) Electr. Des. Autom.12 (2018) no. 4, 401-466. https://doi.org/10.1561/1000000054
  8. T. Berners‐Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, The Semantic Web, Scientific American, May 2001, 29-37.
  9. T. Gruber, Ontology, Encyclopedia of Database Systems, Springer (L. Liu and M. T. Ozsu, eds.) 2008, available at http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-definition-2007.htm.
  10. O. Lassila and R. R. Swick, Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax, W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, 1999.
  11. D. L. McGuinness and F. Van Harmelen, OWL Web ontology language overview, W3C Recommendation 10 (2004), available at https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
  12. B. Dolan. Cell Scope, smartphone diagnostic startup, raises $1 M, 2012, available at http://www.mobihealthnews.com/17598/cellscope-smartphone-diagnostic-startup-raises-1m/.
  13. S. Leng et al., The electronic stethoscope, Biomed. Eng. 14 (2015), 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00560666
  14. Mobile stethoscope. available at http://mobilestethoscope.com/.
  15. 3M Littmann range, available at http://www.littmann.com/.
  16. Rijuven cardio sleeve, available at http://rijuven.com/cardiosleeve.html/.
  17. VitaDock, available at http://www.vitadock.com/vitadock.html.
  18. Magnetic iPhone and Android lens series, available at https://photojojo.com/awesomeness/cell-phone-lenses.
  19. D. Y. Altinkalem, The information level of mothers about fever and febrile, Family Medicine Thesis, T. C. Ministry of Health Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007.
  20. Stanford University, Protege OWL ontology editor, available at http://protege.stanford.edu.
  21. R. Srivastava et al. PEDTERM ontology, available at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/PEDTERM.
  22. Pediatric consultation and monitoring ontology, available at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/PCMO.
  23. I. Horrocks et al., SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, W3C member submission, 21 (2004), 79.
  24. E. Sirin et al., Pellet: a practical OWL‐DL reasoner, Web Semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web 5 (2007), 51-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004
  25. D. Tsarkov and I. Horrocks, FaCT++ description logic reasoner: system description, Proc. of the 6th Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2006), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 4130 (2006), 292-297.
  26. V. Haarslev, et al., The RacerPro knowledge representation and reasoning system, in Proc, Ohio, USA, Semantic Web, Vol. 2011, pp. 1-5.
  27. Pellet API, OWL 2 Reasoner Java API, available at https://github.com/stardog-union/pellet.
  28. M. Horridge and S. Bechhofer. The OWL API: a Java API for working with OWL 2 ontologies, in Proc. Int. Conf. OWL: Experiences Directions, Oct. 2009, pp. 49-58.
  29. D. Crockford.The application/json media type for JavaScript object notation (JSON), RFC 4627, 2006, available at http://www.json.org/json-tr.html.
  30. L. Richardson and S. Ruby, RESTful Web Services, O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2007.

Cited by

  1. Toward automated severe pharyngitis detection with smartphone camera using deep learning networks vol.125, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103980
  2. A Rule-Based System for Human Performance Evaluation: A Case Study vol.11, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11072904