대한건축학회논문집:구조계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction)

  • 제36권3호
  • /
  • Pages.147-157
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-9107(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1788(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공사비 변화에 따른 제로에너지건축물 경제성 분석 - 사회적비용을 고려한 비용편익 분석을 중심으로 -

Economic Analysis of Zero Energy Building in South Korea - focusing on Cost-Benefit analysis considering Social Cost -

  • 김재문 ((주)삼우씨엠건축사사무소 기술연구소)
  • Kim, Jae-Moon (Graduate School of Environmental Studio, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.31
  • 심사 : 2020.03.18
  • 발행 : 2020.03.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

With the increasing obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the building sector, the government has been gradually expanding its obligation to zero-energy buildings since 2020. Since the ZEB certification took effect in 2017, 48 preliminary and main certifications have been completed as of March 2019, and most of them are public buildings or even certified, but have earned Grade 5 of ZEB. This means that compared with the number of annual building permits registered in Korea, the figure is insignificant, and that it receives little if not mandatory. Therefore, this study investigated empirical cases of ZEB additional construction cost and conducted cost benefit analysis according to changes in ZEB additional construction cost based on a preliminary feasibility analysis project recently conducted by the KDI. In addition, considering the public buildings, the social costs were considered, and the cost-benefit analysis method was the same as the KDI's preliminary feasibility analysis method. The analysis shows that if the ratio of ZEB additional construction cost is more than 5 percent, it is analyzed that there is no economic feasibility, and considering that the ratio of additional construction cost in the cases of ZEB in Korea is 17 percent to 38 percent, it will not be easy to obtain ZEB certification in terms of cost. Finally, to narrow these differences in cost and economic aspects, the overseas low energy and ZEB incentive examples proposed measures such as the concept of subsidy payment in Illinois and the compensation of social costs to private ZEB.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 국토교통부

이 연구는 2019년도 국토교통부 도시건축연구개발사업 연구비지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호:19AUDP-B151641-01

참고문헌

  1. Boradman, G., & Vining, W. (2014). Cost-BenefIt Analysis Concepts and Practice, Pearson International Edition, pp.137-171
  2. Celine, F. (2019). Defining the Nearly Zero Energy, Passive House Institute, pp.27-28, from https://passreg.eudownload 01.28.2020 (2020.01.20.)
  3. Cho, S., Sung, U.J., Rim, M.Y., & Kim, S.H. (2018). A Fundamental Study on the Technical Package in Zero Energy Building, Journal of the Korean Institute of Architectural Green Facilities, Vol.12 No.3, pp.253-263
  4. Choe, G. (2017). Policy and Trends of Zero Energy Building in Korea, Construction Technology/Ssangyong, pp.8-15
  5. Choe, J.M. (2013). "Proposal of the process for developing small-sized zero energy building considering the cost", Sungkyunkwan University, pp.1-154.
  6. Hans, E. (2014). Selected examples of Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings(Detailed Report), EPBD, pp.01-72, from https://www.epbd-ca.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CT5_Report_Selected_examples_of_NZEBs-final.pdf
  7. Illinois Clean Energy (2020). Net Zero Energy Building Program, The Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation, from https://www.illinoiscleanenergy.org/energy-program/net-zero-energy-building-program (2020.01.21.)
  8. Joint Related Ministries (2018). 2030 Modification & complementation of the greenhouse gas reduction roadmap, Ministry of Environment, 2018, p.3
  9. Joint Related Ministries (2015). Energy New Industry Proliferation Strategy for the response of the new climate system, The Ministry of Land, pp.3-4, from https://www.motie.go.kr/motie/ne/presse/press2/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_seq_n=157176&bbs_cd_n=81 (2020.01.29.)
  10. Joint related ministries (2014). Early activation plan of zero energy building response to climate change, p.2
  11. Jeong, J.W., Cho, D.W., & Yu, J.Y. (2013). Analysis of the Indoor Thermal Environment and Heating Energy Consumption of Zero Carbon Green Home, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, v.31 n.01, pp.151-158
  12. Jo, D. (2010). Technical Trend of Zero Carbon Green Home Application Technology, Construction Technology/Ssangyong, Winter, (v.57), pp.10-15
  13. Jeon, J.W., Song, G.S., Jun, I.A., & Won, J.Y. (2018). Analyzing Technical Elements of Zero Energy Building through the Case Study of the Main Certification in Korea, Journal of KIAEBS, V.12, No5, Oct, pp.469-486
  14. Jo, Y.J. (2017). An analysis of the effects of 2017 zero energy building renewal & incentives, Korea Energy Agency, pp2-194
  15. Korea Energy Agency (2019). Certification Status of Zero Energy Building, from https://zeb.energy.or.kr/pdsZero/notice_view.aspx?no=246, (2019.01.24.)
  16. Korea Energy Agency (2018). Data Sheet for Element Technologies of Zero Energy Building, pp.1-46, from https://zeb.energy.or.kr/pdsZero/pds_view.aspx?no=207, (2020.01.19.)
  17. Kim, M.H., Kim, H.G., & Hong, G.P. (2018). Design Factors and Initial Cost by Zero Energy Building Rating Systems through Case Study, KIEAE Journal, Vol.18 No.2, pp.55-60 https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2018.18.2.055
  18. Kim, D.E. (2017). Analysis of Renewal and Incentive Effects of Zero Energy Building, Korea Energy Agency, pp1-208
  19. Lim, I.H.., Son, E.J., & Lee, M.J. (2016). A Study on the Long-term Repair Plan for Additional Energy Saving Elements in Zero Energy Housing Complex, Architectural Institute of Korea(structural system), vol.32, No.2, pp.35-43
  20. Lee, M.J. (2016). Is it possible to mandate zero energy building in 2025, Architecture and Urban Space, Vol.22, pp.30-37
  21. Lim, I.H. (2018). A Study on Zero Energy Apartment Cost Benefit Analysis, Department of Architect Graduate School, Myongji University, pp.01-119
  22. Ministry of Environment (2016). Guidelines for the operating objective management of greenhouse gas/energy, Ministry of Environment Notice, No.206-255
  23. Ministry of Land (2020). The Second Green Building Basic Plan, Green Architecture Division, pp.1-12, from http://www.molit.go.kr/USR/NEWS/m_71/dtl.jsp?id=95083381, (2019.06.24.)
  24. Ministry of Land (2018). Building Statistics Summary Report, p.6, from https://www.eais.go.kr/eais/archStat.do?actionFlag=content (2020.01.30.)
  25. Public Investment Management Center (2018). A Study on Modification and Supplement of General Guidelines for Preliminary Feasibility Study(Fifth edition), the Korea Development Institute, 2018, pp.181-213
  26. Public Investment Management Center (2014). Reconstruction a warrior's house, Korea Development Institute Preliminary Feasibility Study Report, pp.2-312
  27. Public Investment Management Center (2015). Smart grid spread business, Korea Development Institute Preliminary Feasibility Study Report, pp.13-50
  28. Sa, H.G., & Han, K.H. (2019). A Study on the Estimation of Additional Cost for the Certification of Zero Energy Apartment Buildings, KJCEM, Vol.20 No.5, pp.21-30
  29. Shin, D.Y., Song, Y.M., & Kim, S.A. (2016). Social Costs Estimation to Evaluate Urban Trip Activity; An application of student housing and social costs analysis for urban planning, Korean Institute of BIM, Vol.6, No.2, pp.19-28
  30. Shin, J.W. (2011). Current Status of Building Environmental Performance and Energy Efficiency Improvement Techniques, CERIK Journal, pp.13-17, from https://zeb.energy.or.kr/pdsZero/pds_view.aspx?no=207, (2020.01.19.)
  31. Vincent, C. (2009). Realizing the Ultimate Goal of Samsung GREEN TOMORROW, SAMSUNG CONSTRUCTION Technology, Vol.61, pp.40-43
  32. Won, J.Y. (2018). A Case Study on the Environment-friendly Architecture of the Second Techno Valley Enterprise Support Hub in Pangyo, Korean Institute of Architectural Green Facilities, Vol.12 No3, pp.54-57
  33. Yu, K.H., & Kim, Y.W. (2018). The trend of the Zero Energy Building System (Focusing on France and Domestic System), KGBC, p. 36. pp.196-194
  34. Zhijian, L., Qingxu Z., Zhiyong, T., & Guangya, J. (2019). A comprehensive analysis on definitions, development, and policies of nearly zero energy buildings in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 114, pp.1-13