Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Types of College Class Perception among College Students

대학생의 수업인식에 관한 주관성 연구

  • 심태은 (동국대학교 역량개발센터) ;
  • 이송이 (동국대학교 다르마칼리지)
  • Received : 2019.11.18
  • Accepted : 2020.03.06
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the subjective structure of classes for college students. This study was conducted using the Q-methodology, and 33 various items were selected through a comprehensive review and revision process. Forty college students were selected for the P sample. The results showed four types of perception regarding college classes: Type 1 (Substantial Class-Focused Type) includes those who want to be a mature person through college classes; Type 2 ( Practical Class-Focused Type) includes those who have an interest in college classes to develop their work skills; Type 3 (Educational Environment-Focused Type) includes those who feel class size, communication with teachers, and the educational system itself are important; and Type 4 (Personal Competence-Focused Type), which includes those who feel that the right to take classes in order to increase their competence without mandatory classes is very important. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the types of individuals in terms of college class perception, as well as to provide reference materials to improve educational innovation for college students.

본 연구는 대학생들이 수업에 대한 인식을 유형화하여 보다 효과적인 수업방식을 도입하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 Q 방법론을 활용하였으며, Q표본은 33개의 진술문으로 구성되었고, P표본은 교양수업을 듣는 40명의 학생으로 구성되었다. 연구결과 총 4가지의 유형이 도출되었으며 유형 1은 수업을 통하여 성장하려고 하는 욕구가 강한 '내실 있는 수업을 중요하게 생각하는 유형', 유형 2는 수업을 듣는 과정이 일을 할 때 실질적인 도움이 되기를 기대하는 '실무능력 향상을 중요하게 생각하는 유형', 유형 3은 수강인원수나 교수와의 소통, 실질적인 환경 등에 중점을 두는 '교육환경을 중요하게 생각하는 유형', 유형 4는 스스로 듣고 싶은 수업을 통하여 다양한 지적 역량을 향상시키고자 하는 '개인적인 역량 향상을 중요하게 생각하는 유형' 등으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과가 대학 수업의 질을 향상하고 다양한 대학생의 수업 요구를 충족할 수 있도록 돕는 기초자료가 되기를 바란다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. H. Jeong, "An Importance-Performance Analysis of Conceptions of Good Instruction in Higher Education : Based on the College of Education", Korean education, vol.43, no.1, pp. 231-259, 2016. UCI : G704-000419.2016.43.1.007
  2. S. J. Chae, "An Investigation on Curriculum Design in Outcome Based Curriculum", Medical education, vol.11, no.1, pp.3-9, 2009. UCI : G704-SER000002144.2009.11.1.001
  3. Feldman, K. A. "The superior college teacher from the student's view", Research in Higher Education, no.5, pp.243-288. 1976.
  4. H. R. Min, "The characteristics of good teaching based on the students' awareness : The comparative analysis of actual learning experiences between A university in Korea and oversea universities", The Journal of Yeolin Education, vol.19. no.1. pp57-88, 2011. UCI : G704-001282.2011.19.1.008
  5. C. G. Koh, "An Ethnographic Study on the Instructional Characteristics Found in Elementary School Teachers; 'Good' Instruction : Focused on Act, Elicitation, Teaching Behavior Element, and Repair", The Journal of Yeolin Education, vol.14. no.1. pp.25-49, 2006. UCI : G704-001282.2006.14.1.008
  6. Johnson-Farmer, B. J. & Frenn, M. "Teaching excellence: What great teachers teach us", Journal of Professional Nursing, vol.25, no.5, pp.267-272. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.020
  7. McMahon, T. "Teaching for more effective learning: Seven maxims for practice", Radiography, vol.12, no.1, pp.34-44. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2005.03.009
  8. Eom, M., Kim, M. Chang, S., & Park, I. "A study on perception of good instruction between in-service and pre-service teachers", The Korea Educational Review, vol.15, no.1, pp107-132. 2009. UCI : G704-001273.2009.15.1.007
  9. Kwon, S. "The dfferences in teachers' conceptions of the importance and practice of good teaching according to the level of school and teaching experience", The Journal of Yeolin Education, vol.18, no.4, pp.78-103. 2010. UCI : G704-001282.2010.18.4.011
  10. Reid, D. J., ＆ Johnston, M. "Improving teaching in higher education: Student an teacher perspectives", Educational Studies, vol.25, no.3, pp.269-281, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055699997792
  11. Zimitat, C. "First year students' perceptions of the importance of good teaching: Not all things are equal", Research and Development in Higher Education, vol.29, pp.386-392. 2006.
  12. Kang, H., Ko, E., Kim, T., Cho, W., Lee, K., & Lee, D. "Mathematics teachers' perspectives on competencies for good teaching and perspective teacher education", School Mathematics, vol.13, no.4, pp.633-649. 2011. UCI : G704-000843.2011.13.4.009
  13. Choi, S. "Analysis on the characteristics of good teaching perceived by junior college student: Based on a case study of K college", The Korea Contents Society, vol.14, no.8. pp.517-527. 2014. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.517
  14. Brophy, J. Teaching (Educational practices series-1). Brussels, Belgium: International Academy of Education, 2000.
  15. Yune, S. "Analysis of good college teaching characteristics by multi-faceted approach", The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, vol.24, no.6, pp.963-976. 2012. UCI : G704-001373.2012.24.6.011 https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2012.24.6.963
  16. Lee, S., Lee, Y., & Li, L. "Comparison of the high school teachers and students perception on Good Instruction in Korea and China". Korean Journal of Comparative Education, vol.18, no.3, pp27-47, 2008. UCI : G704-SER000002131.2008.18.3.001
  17. Park. M. J. "Students' Perceptions of Good Teaching in Higher Education -An Essay-Review of College Students", the study of humanities, vol.75. pp229-253. 2008. UCI : G704-001795.2008.35.3.002
  18. Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Rytkonen, H. "Students' conceptions of good teaching in three different disciplines". Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. vol.36. no.5, pp.549-563. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541023