Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제33권6호
  • /
  • Pages.973-980
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nutritional value and in situ degradability of fruit-vegetable byproducts and their feeding effects on performance of growing Hanwoo steers

  • Song, Keun Hong (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Woo, Jun Sik (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Ju Ri (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Ryu, Gyeong Lim (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Baek, Youl Chang (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Oh, Young Kyoon (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwak, Wan Sup (College of Medical Life Sciences, Konkuk University) ;
  • Park, Keun Kyu (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.25
  • 심사 : 2020.01.28
  • 발행 : 2020.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate nutritional value and in situ degradability of fruit-vegetable byproducts and their feeding effects on performance of growing Hanwoo steers. Methods: Nutritional value and in situ degradability of cabbage, Chinese cabbage and fruit-vegetable byproducts were assessed. In vivo feeding trial was also performed for 12 weeks. Thirty-six growing steers were randomly allocated into three groups according to body weight (BW) and age in 12 pens (4 replications/treatment) and assigned to one of the three dietary treatments: control (byproduct 0%), FV-B (fruit-vegetable byproduct 20%), and CA-B (cabbage peel 15% plus Chinese cabbage peel 15%, total byproduct 30%). Results: The crude protein contents of cabbage, Chinese cabbage and fruit-vegetable byproducts were 18.69%, 20.20%, and 10.07%, respectively. Concentrations of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were higher in cabbage (22.31%) and Chinese cabbage (28.83%) than fruit-vegetable (13.94%). Higher concentrations of non-fiber carbohydrate were observed for fruit-vegetable (66.72%) than cabbage (44.93%) and Chinese cabbage byproducts (24.69%). The effective degradability (ED) of both dry matter (DM) and NDF for fruit-vegetable byproduct (DM, 84.69%; NDF, 85.62%) was higher (p<0.05) than cabbage (DM, 68.47%; NDF, 55.97%) and Chinese cabbage byproducts (DM, 68.09%; NDF, 54.22%). The DM intake was not different among treatments because the amount of feed was kept constant according to the BW of growing steers to prevent overweight during the growing period. The average daily gain during the whole experimental period was not different among treatments (1.26, 1.25, and 1.34 kg/d for control, FV-B, and CA-B). The ED of both DM and NDF degradability of the total mixed ration (TMR) diets were very similar among treatments. Feed conversion ratio during the whole period showed no significant difference among treatments. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that fruit-vegetable and cabbage byproducts up to 20% and 30% (as fed basis), respectively can be included in TMR diets for growing beef cattle.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Porat R, Lichter A, Terry LA, Harker R, Buzby J. Postharvest losses of fruit and vegetables during retail and in consumers' homes: quantifications, causes, and means of prevention. Postharvest Biol Technol 2018;139:135-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.11.019
  2. FAO. Production - Crops. Cabbages and other brassicas [Internet]. FAO; c2019 [cited 2019 Aug] Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare
  3. Choi MH, Ji GE, Koh KH, Ryu YW, Jo DH, Park YH. Use of waste Chinese cabbage as a substrate for yeast biomass production. Bioresour Technol 2002;83:251-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00232-2
  4. Kim YS, Phae CG. Analysis of generation characteristics for fruit and vegetables byproducts generated in G public agricultural wholesale market. J Korea Soc Waste Manag 2019;36:49-54. https://doi.org/10.9786/kswm.2019.36.1.49
  5. Ahmadi F, Lee YH, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park KK, Kwak WS. Preservation of fruit and vegetable discards with sodium metabisulfite. J Environ Manage 2018;224:113-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.044
  6. Ahmadi F, Lee YH, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park KK, Kwak WS. Long-term anaerobic conservation of fruit and vegetable discards without or with moisture adjustment after aerobic preservation with sodium metabisulfite. Waste Manage 2019; 87:258-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.010
  7. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC Int.; 2000.
  8. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC Int.; 2006.
  9. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analysis. USDA, superintendent of documents. Washington, DC, USA: USDA Agricultural Research Service; 1970. Handbook number 379.
  10. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  11. Nocek JE. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. J Dairy Sci 1988;71:2051-69. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79781-7
  12. Michalet-Doreau B, Ould-Bah MY. In vitro and in sacco methods for the estimation of dietary nitrogen degradability in the rumen: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1992;40:57-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90112-J
  13. Orskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degrability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci 1979;92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
  14. National Institute of Animal Science. Korean feeding standard for Hanwoo. 4th Ed. Jeonju, Korea: Rural Development Administration; 2017.
  15. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  16. Conrad HR, Weiss WP, Odwongo WO, Shockey WL. Estimating net energy lactation from components of cell solubles and cell walls. J Dairy Sci 1984;67:427-36. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81320-X
  17. Gupta R, Chauhan TR, Lall D. Nutritional potential of vegetable waste products for ruminants. Bioresour Technol 1993;44:263-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(93)90162-5
  18. Ngu NT, Ledin I. Effects of feeding wastes from Brassica species on growth of goats and pesticide/insecticide residues in goat meat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2005;18:197-202. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.197
  19. Wadhwa M, Kaushal S, Bakshi MPS. Nutritive evaluation of vegetable wastes as complete feed for goat bucks. Small Rumin Res 2006;64:279-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.017
  20. Angulo J, Mahecha L, Yepes SA, et al. Quantitative and nutritional characterization of fruit and vegetable waste from marketplace: A potential use as bovine feedstuff? J Environ Manage 2012;95:S203-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.022
  21. Esteban MB, Garcia AJ, Ramos P, Marquez MC. Evaluation of fruit-vegetable and fish wastes as alternative feedstuffs in pig diets. Waste Manage 2007;27:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.004
  22. Garcia AJ, Esteban MB, Marquez MC, Ramos P. Biodegradable municipal solid waste: characterization and potential use as animal feedstuffs. Waste Manage 2005;25:780-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.01.006
  23. Karkoodi K, Fazaeli H, Mirghaffari S. Assessing the nutritive value of fruit and vegetable residues as ruminant feed. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2012;36:239-44. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1008-22
  24. Gasa J, Castrillo C, Baucells MD, Guada JA. By-products from the canning industry as feedstuff for ruminants: digestibility and its prediction from chemical composition and laboratory bioassays. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1989;25:67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(89)90108-9
  25. Chung KY, Lee SH, Cho SH, Kwon EG, Lee JH. Current situation and future prospects for beef production in South Korea - a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:951-60. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0187
  26. National Institute of Animal Science. Korean feeding standard program for Hanwoo [Internet]. National Institute of Animal Science; c2015 [2019 May]. Available from: http://www.nias.go.kr/front/researchUtilizeBoardView.do?cmCode=M090918001117679&cntntsNo=8507&columnName=title&searc hStr=
  27. Froetschel MA, Ross CL, Stewart Jr. RL, Azain MJ, Michot P, Rekaya R. Nutritional value of ensiled grocery food waste for cattle. J Anim Sci 2014;92:5124-33. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8126

피인용 문헌

  1. Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Waste: Safety and Nutritional Characterisation for Their Potential Re-Use in Livestock Nutrition vol.13, pp.16, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169478
  2. White Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) waste, as biowaste for the preparation of novel superabsorbent polymer gel vol.9, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106689