Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of dietary supplementation of autolyzed whole yeast and yeast cell wall products on broiler chickens

  • Received : 2019.03.18
  • Accepted : 2019.06.11
  • Published : 2020.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of yeast products on growth performance, visceral organ weights, endogenous enzyme activities, ileal nutrient digestibility and meat yield of broiler chickens fed diets containing autolyzed whole yeast (WY) and yeast cell walls (YCW) at varying levels of inclusion. Methods: Nine dietary treatments consisting of WY or YCW included at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 g/kg diet and a control diet without yeast supplementation was used in the experiment. Each of the nine treatments was replicated six times with nine birds per replicate. Birds were housed in cages, in climate-controlled rooms and fed starter, grower and finisher diets. Results: There was an improvement (p<0.05) in body weight gain and feed conversion ratio on d 10, 24, and 35 for birds fed 1.0 to 2.0 g/kg WY or YCW diet. Small intestine weight was heavier on d 10 and 24 for birds on higher levels of WY and YCW compared to the control group. On d 10 and 24, there was a significant increase (p<0.05) in tissue protein content and pancreatic enzyme activities (trypsin and chymotrypsin) of birds on 1.5 to 2.0 g/kg WY and YCW diets compared to the control group. Compared to the control group, birds on WY (2.0 g/kg diet) and YCW (at 1.5 and 2.0 g/kg diet) had better (p<0.05) protein digestibility on d 24. On d 35, there was significant improvement (p<0.05) in percentage of carcass, absolute and relative breast weight for broiler chickens fed WY and YCW mostly at 2 g/kg diet compared to birds on the control diet. Conclusion: Supplementation of diets with autolyzed WY and YCW products especially at 1.5 to 2.0 g/kg diet improved broiler chicken performance and meat yield through their positive effects on ileal protein digestibility and pancreatic enzyme activities.

Keywords

References

  1. Stanton TB. A call for antibiotic alternatives research. Trends Microbiol 2013;21:111-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.002
  2. Castanon JIR. History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poult Sci 2007;86:2466-71. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00249
  3. Huyghebaert G, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F. An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. Vet J 2011;187:182-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.03.003
  4. Edens FW. An alternative for antibiotic use in poultry: probiotics. Braz J Poult Sci 2003;5:75-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2003000200001
  5. Diarra MS, Malouin F. Antibiotics in Canadian poultry productions and anticipated alternatives. Front Microbiol 2014; 5:282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00282
  6. Roto SM, Rubinelli PM, Ricke SC. An Introduction to the avian gut microbiota and the effects of yeast-based prebiotic-type compounds as potential feed additives. Front Vet Sci 2015;2:28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00028
  7. Morales-Lopez R, Auclair E, Van Immerseel F, Ducatelle R, Garcia F, Brufau J. Effects of different yeast cell wall supplements added to maize- or wheat-based diets for broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 2010;51:399-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.503484
  8. Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee SK, et al. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poult Sci 2005;84:1015-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.7.1015
  9. Jung B, Batal A. Effect of dietary nucleotide supplementation on performance and development of the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Br Poult Sci 2012;53:98-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.659654
  10. Shareef AM, Al-Dabbagh ASA. Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance of broiler chicks. Iraqi J Vet Sci 2009;23:23-9. https://doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2009.5683
  11. Kim GB, Seo YM, Kim CH, Paik IK. Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora, and immune response of broilers. Poult Sci 2011;90:75-82. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00732
  12. Muthusamy N, Halder S, Ghosh TK, Bedford MR. Effect of hydrolysed Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and yeast cell wall components on live performance, intestinal histo-morphology and humoral immune response of broilers. Br Poult Sci 2011; 52:694-703. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.633072
  13. Ghosh TK, Haldar S, Bedford MR, Muthusami N, Samanta I. Assessment of yeast cell wall as replacements for antibiotic growth promoters in broiler diets: effects on performance, intestinal histo-morphology and humoral immune responses. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2012;96:275-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01155.x
  14. Yalcinkaya İ, Guengoer T, Basalan M, Erdem E. Mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in broilers: Effects on performance and blood biochemistry. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2008;32:43-8.
  15. Munyaka PM, Echeverry H, Yitbarek A, et al. Local and systemic innate immunity in broiler chickens supplemented with yeast-derived carbohydrates. Poult Sci 2012;91:2164-72. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02306
  16. Gao J, Zhang HJ, Wu SG, et al. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on immune functions of broilers challenged with Eimeria tenella. Poult Sci 2009;88:2141-51. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00151
  17. Aviagen Ross 308 Broiler Nutrition Specification. Huntsville, AL, USA: Aviagen Inc,; 2014. http://en.aviagen.com/
  18. Sweeney RA. Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds: collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 1989;72:770-4.
  19. Short FJ, Gorton P, Wiseman J, Boorman KN. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;59:215-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00916-7
  20. Susbilla JP, Tarvid I, Gow CB, Frankel TL. Quantitative feed restriction or meal-feeding of broiler chicks alter functional development of enzymes for protein digestion. Br Poult Sci 2003;44:698-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660310001643679
  21. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976;72:248-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
  22. Erlanger BF, Kokowski N, Cohen W. The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates of trypsin. Arch Biochem Biophys 1961;95:271-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(61)90145-X
  23. Caviedes-Vidal E, Karasov WH. Developmental changes in digestive physiology of nestling house sparrows, Passer domesticus. Physiol Biochem Zool 2001;74:769-82. https://doi.org/10.1086/322966
  24. Iji PA, Saki A, Tivey DR. Body and intestinal growth of broiler chicks on a commercial starter diet. 2. Development and characteristics of intestinal enzymes. Br Poult Sci 2001;42:514-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120073142
  25. Minitab 17 Statistical Software. [Computer software]. State College, PA, USA: Minitab, Inc.; 2013.
  26. Bradley GL, Savage, TF, Timm KI. The effects of supplementing diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii on male poult performance and ileal morphology. Poult Sci 1994;73:1766-70. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731766
  27. Konca Y, Kirkpinar F, Mert S. Effects of mannan-oligosaccharides and live yeast in diets on the carcass, cut yields, meat composition and colour of finishing turkeys. Asia-Australas J Anim Sci 2009;22:550-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80350
  28. Santin E, Maiorka A, Macari M. Performance and intestinal mucosa development of broiler chickens fed diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J Appl Poult Res 2001;10:236-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/10.3.236
  29. Fuller R. Probiotic in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 1989; 66:365-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  30. Chacher MFA, Kamran Z, Ahsan U, et al. Use of mannan oligosaccharide in broiler diets: an overview of underlying mechanism. Worlds Poult Sci J 2017;73:831-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000757
  31. Yang Y, Iji PA, Choct M. Effects of different dietary levels of mannanoligosaccharide on growth performance and gut development of broiler chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2007;20:1084-91. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1084
  32. Paryad A, Mahmoudi M. Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance, blood constituents and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Afr J Agric Res 2008;3:835-42.
  33. Waldroup PW, Fritts CA, Yan F. Utilization of bio-mos mannan oligosaccharide and Bioplex1 cooper in broiler diets. Int J Poult Sci 2003;2:44-52. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2003.44.52
  34. Blair EC, Allen HM, Brooks SE, et al. Effects of Calsporin$^{(R)}$ on turkey performance, carcass yield and nitrogen reduction. Int J Poult Sci 2004;3:75-9. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.75.79

Cited by

  1. Dietary hydrolysed yeast cell wall extract is comparable to antibiotics in the control of subclinical necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens vol.60, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2019.1664727
  2. Effects of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a substitute to antibiotic on growth performance, immune function, serum biochemical parameters and intestinal morphology of broilers vol.49, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2021.1876705
  3. A comparison of two probiotics Aspergillus oryzae and, Saccharomyces cerevisiae on productive performance, egg quality, small intestinal morphology, and gene expression in laying Japanese quail vol.20, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2021.1878944
  4. Effects of dried yeast, a byproduct of the brewery industry, on the egg production and quality and the immune response of laying hens vol.20, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2021.1940322
  5. Different combinations of peppermint, chamomile and a yeast prebiotic have different impacts on production and severity of intestinal and bursal abnormalities of broilers challenged with coccidiosis vol.20, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2021.1983479
  6. Supplemental effect of bamboo charcoal and bamboo vinegar, alone or in combination, on laying hen performance, egg quality, intestinal bacterial populations and alteration of intestinal villi vol.20, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2021.2007802
  7. Influence of yeast hydrolysate supplement on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, microflora, gas emission, blood profile, and meat quality in broilers vol.63, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e61
  8. Effects of spray dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on growth performance and carcass characteristics, gut health, cecal microbiota profile and apparent ileal digestibility of protein, amino acids vol.53, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02684-5