Journal of Forest and Environmental Science

Institute of Forest Science, kangwon National University (강원대학교 산림과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Evaluation Criteria for Forest Education Using the CIPP Model

  • Kim, Soyeon (Department of Forest Management, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Choi, Jungkee (Department of Forest Management, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2019.11.15
  • Accepted : 2020.01.05
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop evaluation criteria for forest education using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. To this end, we designed a survey based on expert advice and content analysis of previous studies on the CIPP model and forest education. The survey was conducted on 393 forest education specialists, and Cronbach's α coefficient was set as 0.6 or higher to verify reliability and validity, and to determine reliability by factor. Eventually, 52 out of 57 evaluation items were extracted, and the evaluation indexes were selected through factor analysis as follows: four evaluation indexes for the context dimension, namely "Clarity of goal setting," "Developing conditions for education," "Meeting of requirements," and "Institutional drive"; three evaluation indexes for the input dimension, namely "Acquisition of education infrastructure," "Establishment of operational support," and "Adequacy of assigned manpower"; four evaluation indexes for the process dimension, which were "Adequacy of budget allocation," "Expertise of forest education instructors," "Diversity of programs," and "Public-private academic partnership"; and five evaluation indexes for the product dimension, namely "Effectiveness of perception change," "Influence over the society," "Continuity of improvement in evaluation," "Continuity of education," and "Verification of the effects of education."

Keywords

References

  1. Bae HS. 1994. Program evaluation. Wonmisa, Seoul, pp 457.
  2. Cho SH. 1992. Korea's Technical and Vocational Education Policy Evaluation. Doctoral dissertation. Hongik University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  3. Cho YS. 2015. The Development of Evaluation Criteria for School Consulting Based on the CIPP Evaluation Model. Doctoral dissertation. Incheon National University, Incheon, Korea. (in Korean)
  4. Choi JC, Kim YH, Jeon DG. 2007. Criteria for evaluating the quality of lifelongeducation lecturer. J Korean Educ 34: 155-186.
  5. Choi JY. 2000. Criteria development of educational practice program evaluation by CIPP evaluation model. MS thesis. Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  6. Han HR. 2011. (The) development of the evaluation indicators based upon CIPP model for after school program. Doctoral dissertation. Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea. (in Korean)
  7. Hecht AR. 1975. Utility of the Cipp Model for Evaluating an Established Career Programin a Community College. Washington, ERIC Clearinghouse, pp 6.
  8. Inoue M, Oishi Y, Fujii T, Kobayashi H. 2008. Forestry Education Support by a Forest Research Institute: Development of Forestry Educational Programs for Vocational High Schools. J For Environ Sci 24: 175-179.
  9. Jeon HC, Kim SW. 2009. Development of the evaluation scale for elementary school special supplemental program : applying the CIPP evaluation model. Doctoral dissertation. Elem Educ Res 22: 83-111. (in Korean with English abstract)
  10. Jeong AY. 2012. Effectiveness Analysis on Middle School Cyber Home Study based on the CIPP Evaluation Model. MS thesis. Ajou University, Suwon, Korea. (in Korean)
  11. Jeong JG. 2000. An Application of CIPP Evaluation Model for the Improvement of Korean Accreditation System. Doctoral dissertation. Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea. (in Korean)
  12. Kim AJ. 2008. Criteria Development for Evaluating Traditional Nursery Song Programs by CIPP Evaluation Model and Applying to Early Childhood Educational Institutions. Doctoral dissertation. Keimyung University, Daego, Korea. (in Korean)
  13. Kim HS. 2012. An Evaluation of Peer Counseling Program in Middle Schools based on CIPP Model. MS thesis. Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  14. Kim SC. 2014. Evaluation criteria development for the subject classroom system curriculum in the school level. Doctoral dissertation. Konkuk University. Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  15. Kim SW, Han HR. 2008. An Evaluation on After School Program in Middle Schools. J Educ Eval 21: 27-53.
  16. Kim SY, Choi JK. 2018. Effects of Forest Experience Activity on the Attitude toward Forest and Personality of Primary School Students. J For Environ Sci 34: 490-496.
  17. Kim WJ. 2011. Evaluation of consulting supervision by CIPP evaluation model. MS thesis. Sogang University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  18. Koo KH, Nam SM. 2019. The Development of Evaluation Scale for Middle School Free Semester Activity Program Based on CIPP Evaluation Model. Stud Korean Youth Activity 5: 31-35.
  19. Korea Forest Service. 2011. Forest Education Promotion Act. https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfs/idx/Index.do. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
  20. Korea Forest Service. 2015. Establishment of the Korean forest education systems and program development for sustainable development. https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfs/idx/Index.do. Accessed 13 Nov 2019.
  21. Korean Council for University Education. 1995. Comprehensive University Evaluation Report, 1995. Korean Council for University Education, Seoul.
  22. Lee JH, Kim SH, Kim JM. 2010. Evaluation Study on Policy of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development Using CIPP Evaluation Model. Korea Educ Rev 16: 183-213.
  23. Lee KN. 2010. The Development of the Process-oriented Evaluation Criteria for the Cyber Education Program of Human Resource Development. Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea. (in Korean)
  24. Lee KY. 2009. A Study on The Evaluation of Education Welfare Policies: Supportive Project for the Priority Region of Educational Welfare Investment. Doctoral dissertation. Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. (in Korean)
  25. Lee SH, Yun MH, Cho CH. 2017. Development of Evaluation Scale at Long-Term Facilities based on CIPP Evaluation Model. J Korean Soc Qual Manag 2017: 119-120.
  26. Lee YG, Choi JK. 2004. New Perspective of Forest Recreation Program in Gangwon-do. J For Environ Sci 20: 28-39.
  27. Lim JY. 2007. Conceptual Framework of Theory-Driven Evaluative Criteria Set: Choosing Youth Activity Program. J Youth Stud 14: 47-70.
  28. Min BJ. 2002. A study on the construction of comprehensive educational policy evaluation model. Doctoral dissertation. Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  29. Park JH. 2017. The Comparison of Perceptions between School Consulting Managers, Clients, and School Consultants on School Consulting: Focusing on the CIPP Evaluation Model. Doctoral dissertation. Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea. (in Korean)
  30. Schreyer R, Driver BL. 1990. The benefits of wildland recreation participation: what we know and where we need to go. RM Gen Tech Rep 196: 20-35.
  31. Seo JH. 1987. Evaluation of Education Policies in Korea. CNU J Educ Stud 41-66. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2019.40.3.41
  32. Shin WS. 1999. Forest Experience and Environmental Education. For Cult 8: 28-30. (in Korean)
  33. Stufflebeam DL; Phi Delta Kappa. 1971. Educational evaluation and decision making. Phi Delta Kappa, Bloomington, Indiana.
  34. Yun MH, Lim HS. 2008. Development of Inventories for After-School Program Evaluation. Educ Eval Res 21: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2167/erie1.0