Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Integrated Type of the Cadastral System and Land Registration System in Foreign Countries

지적제도와 토지등기제도의 통합 사례에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2020.04.22
  • Accepted : 2020.06.12
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to derive the type by examining and analyzing the integrated cases of the Cadastral System (hereafter as CS.) and the Land Registration System (hereafter as LRS.) except for France, the Netherlands, Japan, and Taiwan introduced in Korea. As a result of the study, it was confirmed that the CS. and LRS. were integrated in Turkey, Indonesia, Hungary, Czech Republic, and Lithuania, and the following three types were drawn as a result of analyzing the integration case. First, the French type, the CS. and LRS. has been integrated since the establishment of the system, and the central and state governments are managed by one Administrative Agency, The basic municipalities include France and Turkey, which are managed by two separate agencies. Second, the Dutch type, there are Netherlands, Indonesia, and Lithuania, which are integrated and managed by one Administrative Agency since the creation of the CS. and LRS. Third, the Japanese type, there are Japan, Taiwan, Hungary, and Czech Republic which was separated from the creation of the CS. and the LRS. and the CS. was managed by the Administrative Agency and the LRS. was managed by the Judicial Agency. but after integrated both systems were managed by one Administrative Agency, Furthermore, CS. was managed by the Administrative Agency in all countries but LRS. was managed by the Judicial Agency in some countries. but after integrated both systems were managed by one Administrative Agency. I hope that active research on the integration of the CS. and LRS. will be carried out in the future, and hope that the results of this study will be used as basic data for research on how to integrate the CS. and LRS. in Korea.

본 연구의 목적은 우리나라에 소개된 프랑스·네덜란드·일본·대만을 제외하고 지적제도와 토지등기제도의 통합사례를 조사 분석하여 그 유형을 도출하는데 있다. 연구 결과 터키·인도네시아·헝가리·체코·리투아니아 등에서 지적제도와 등기제도가 통합되어 있는 사실을 확인하였으며, 통합 사례를 분석한 결과 다음과 같이 세 가지 유형이 도출되었다. 첫째, 프랑스 형으로, 지적제도와 등기제도의 창설 당시부터 통합되어 중앙정부와 주정부는 행정부의 1개부에서 관장하고 있으나, 기초자치단체는 이를 분리하여 2개의 기관에서 관장하는 프랑스·터키 등이 있으며, 둘째, 네덜란드 형으로, 지적제도와 등기제도의 창설 당시부터 통합되어 행정부의 1개부에서 관장하는 네덜란드·인도네시아·리투아니아 등이 있고, 셋째, 일본 형으로, 지적제도와 등기제도의 창설 당시부터 분리되어 지적제도는 행정부에서, 등기제도는 사법부에서 관장하였으나, 이를 통합하여 행정부의 1개부에서 관장하는 일본·대만·헝가리·체코 등의 국가가 있다. 그리고 지적제도는 모든 국가가 행정부에서 관장하고 있으며, 등기제도는 일부 국가가 사법부에서 관장하고 있었으나, 통합한 후에는 모두 행정부에서 관장하는 것으로 분석되었다. 앞으로 지적제도와 등기제도의 통합사례에 관한 적극적인 연구가 이루어지길 바라며, 본 연구 결과가 지적과 등기제도의 통합 방안에 관한 연구의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwak Yj. 1998. Real Estate Law. Seoul. Park Young-sa. 72.
  2. Ministry of Home Affairs. 1975. Inspection report of comparative study on Cadastral System. 115-119.
  3. Ministry of Home Affairs. 1979. Inspection report of comparative study on Cadastral System. 8.
  4. Park SP. 1982. Foreign Cadastral System Research Report(focused on the Cadastral and registered unification of Japan and Taiwan). Ministry of Home Affairs. 57-78.
  5. Cadastral Research Institute of KCSC. 2005. Cadastral History and Resurveying in France. 43.
  6. Cadastral Research Institute of KCSC. 2010. Comparison of advanced foreign Cadastral systems. 17-88.
  7. Ryu BC. 2017. Cadastral Science(2nd Edition). Seoul. Buyonsa. 46:490-491.
  8. Ryu BC. 2019. A New Perspectives on the Research of Domestic and Overseas Land Category System. Journal of Cadastre & Land Informatix. 49(2):164.
  9. Ahn Gj. 1997. Real Estate Registration Law. KCSC. Training Institute(Training Materials). 5.
  10. Lee Gt. 1974. Research on Real Estate Registration and Improvement of Cadastral System. [Master's Thesis]. Konkuk University.
  11. Jeong TL. 1971. The Land Administration of Japan and Taiwan(Japan & Taiwan Inspection and Education Results Report). Gyeonggido. 28-30.
  12. Korean Cadastral Society. 1993. Unification Method of Land Registration Disclosure System (Integrated Cadastral & Registration System). 65-77.
  13. Bronislovas Mikuta. 2003. FIG. Commission 7. Cadastre and Land Management. Lithuania:2.
  14. Gyula Ivan. 2007. "Unified Land Administration for a Better Spatial Infrastructure". FIG. Commission 7 Annual Meeting 2007. KCSC. 600.
  15. Gyula Ivan. 2007. "New e-services in the Hungarian Unified Land Registry System". FIG. Commission 7 Annual Meeting 2007. KCSC. 261-263.
  16. Romualdas Kasperavicius. 2007. "New e-services for Land Administration in Lithuania". FIG. Commission 7 Annual Meeting 2007. KCSC. 281-283.
  17. Supranowo. 1992. "A Challenge to Accelerate the Land Registration Implementation in Indonesia". International Conference on Cadastral Reform '92. Department of Surveying and Land Information. The University of Melbourne. 460. 463:473-474.