Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dietary lysophospholipids supplementation inhibited the activity of lipolytic bacteria in forage with high oil diet: an in vitro study

  • Kim, Hanbeen (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Byeongwoo (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cho, Seongkeun (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kwon, Inhyuk (EASY BIO, Inc.) ;
  • Seo, Jakyeom (Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2019.10.31
  • Accepted : 2020.01.22
  • Published : 2020.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of lysophospholipids (LPL) supplementation on rumen fermentation, degradability, and microbial diversity in forage with high oil diet in an in vitro system. Methods: Four experimental treatments were used: i) annual ryegrass (CON), ii) 93% annual ryegrass +7% corn oil on a dry matter (DM) basis (OiL), iii) OiL with a low level (0.08% of dietary DM) of LPL (LLPL), and iv) OiL with a high level (0.16% of dietary DM) of LPL (HLPL). An in vitro fermentation experiment was performed using strained rumen fluid for 48 h incubations. In vitro DM degradability (IVDMD), in vitro neutral detergent fiber degradability, pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), volatile fatty acid (VFA), and microbial diversity were estimated. Results: There was no significant change in IVDMD, pH, NH3-N, and total VFA production among treatments. The LPL supplementation significantly increased the proportion of butyrate and valerate (Linear effect [Lin], p = 0.004 and <0.001, respectively). The LPL supplementation tended to increase the total bacteria in a linear manner (p = 0.089). There were significant decreases in the relative proportions of cellulolytic (Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus albus) and lipolytic (Anaerovibrio lipolytica and Butyrivibrio proteoclasticus) bacteria with increasing levels of LPL supplementation (Lin, p = 0.028, 0.006, 0.003, and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: The LPL supplementation had antimicrobial effects on several cellulolytic and lipolytic bacteria, with no significant difference in nutrient degradability (DM and neutral detergent fiber) and general bacterial counts, suggesting that LPL supplementation might increase the enzymatic activity of rumen bacteria. Therefore, LPL supplementation may be more effective as an antimicrobial agent rather than as an emulsifier in the rumen.

Keywords

References

  1. Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O'Mara F, McAllister TA. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 2008;48:21-7. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA 07199
  2. Joshi A, Paratkar SG, Thorat BN. Modification of lecithin by physical, chemical and enzymatic methods. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2006;108:363-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600016
  3. Boontiam W, Jung B, Kim YY. Effects of lysophospholipid supplementation to lower nutrient diets on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and blood metabolites in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2017;96:593-601. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew269
  4. Polycarpo GV, Burbarelli MFC, CarAo ACP, et al. Effects of lipid sources, lysophospholipids and organic acids in maize-based broiler diets on nutrient balance, liver concentration of fat-soluble vitamins, jejunal microbiota and performance. Br Poult Sci 2016;57:788-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/000716 68.2016.1219019
  5. Zampiga M, Meluzzi A, Sirri F. Effect of dietary supplementation of lysophospholipids on productive performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass quality traits of broiler chickens. Ital J Anim Sci 2016;15:521-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/182805 1X.2016.1192965
  6. Zhao PY, Li HL, Hossain MM, Kim IH. Effect of emulsifier (lysophospholipids) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood profile in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2015;207:190-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeed sci.2015.06.007
  7. Jenkins TC, Gimenez T, Cross DL. Influence of phospholipids on ruminal fermentation in vitro and on nutrient digestion and serum lipids in sheep. J Anim Sci 1989;67:529-37. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.672529x
  8. Sontakke UB, Kaur H, Tyagi AK, et al. In vitro evaluation of rice bran lyso-phospholipids for its use in ruminant ration. Indian J Anim Nutr 2014;31:65-8.
  9. Lee C, Morris DL, Copelin JE, Hettick JM, Kwon IH. Effects of lysophospholipids on short-term production, nitrogen utilization, and rumen fermentation and bacterial population in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2019;102:3110-20. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15777
  10. Lee CH, Sung HG, Eslami M, et al. Effects of Tween 80 pretreatment on dry matter disappearance of rice straw and cellulolytic bacterial adhesion. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2007;20:1397-401. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1397
  11. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18 ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists International; 2005.
  12. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  13. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, prcedures, and some applications). Washington, DC, USA: USDA Agr Handb; 1970.
  14. Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1994;48:185-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6
  15. Schofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J Anim Sci 1994;72:2980-91. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112980x
  16. Pell AN, Schofield P. Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:1063-73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77435-4
  17. Chaney AL, Marbach EP. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem 1962;8:130-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130
  18. Yu Z, Morrison M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 2004;36:808-12. https://doi.org/10.2144/04365ST04
  19. Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2006;58:572-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x
  20. Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, Krause DO. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:7115-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00739-09
  21. Whelan JA, Russell NB, Whelan MA. A method for the absolute quantification of cDNA using real-time PCR. J Immunol Methods 2003;278:261-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(03)00223-0
  22. Matsuba K, Padlom A, Khongpradit A, et al. Selection of plant oil as a supplemental energy source by monitoring rumen profiles and its dietary application in Thai crossbred beef cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2019;32:1511-20. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0946
  23. Rodrigues JPP, Ramin M, Huhtanen P, Aru F, Detmann E, Marcondes MI. Effect of soya bean oil supplementation and forage type on methane production and fibre digestibility using the in vitro gas production system. Grass Forage Sci 2018;73:368-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12326
  24. Brooks CC, Garner GB, Gehrke CW, Muhrer ME, Pfander WH. The effect of added fat on the digestion of cellulose and protein by ovine rumen microorganisms. J Anim Sci 1954;13:758-64. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1954.134758x
  25. Jenkins TC. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76:3851-63. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77727-9
  26. Kamande GM, Baah J, Cheng K-J, McAllister TA, Shelford JA. Effects of Tween 60 and Tween 80 on protease activity, thiol group reactivity, protein adsorption, and cellulose degradation by rumen microbial enzymes. J Dairy Sci 2000;83:536-42. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74913-7
  27. Getachew G, DePeters EJ, Robinson PH, Taylor SJ. In vitro rumen fermentation and gas production: influence of yellow grease, tallow, corn oil and their potassium soaps. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001;93:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00264-4
  28. Pi Y, Ma L, Pierce KM, Wang HR, Xu JC, Bu DP. Rubber seed oil and flaxseed oil supplementation alter digestion, ruminal fermentation and rumen fatty acid profile of dairy cows. Animal 2019;13:2811-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111900137X
  29. Bauman D, Perfield J, De Veth M, Lock A. New perspectives on lipid digestion and metabolism in ruminants. In: Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf; 2003: Cornell University NY, USA. p. 175-89.
  30. Remond B, Souday E, Jouany JP. In vitro and in vivo fermentation of glycerol by rumen microbes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1993;41:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90 118-4
  31. Yang SL, Bu DP, Wang JQ, et al. Soybean oil and linseed oil supplementation affect profiles of ruminal microorganisms in dairy cows. Animal 2009;3:1562-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990462
  32. El-Nor SA, AbuGhazaleh AA, Potu RB, Hastings D, Khattab MSA. Effects of differing levels of glycerol on rumen fermentation and bacteria. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010;162:99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.012
  33. Rico DE, Ying Y, Harvatine KJ. Effects of lysolecithin on milk fat synthesis and milk fatty acid profile of cows fed diets differing in fiber and unsaturated fatty acid concentration. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:9042-7. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12976
  34. Polycarpo GV, Burbarelli MFC, Carao ACP, et al. Effects of lipid sources, lysophospholipids and organic acids in maize-based broiler diets on nutrient balance, liver concentration of fat-soluble vitamins, jejunal microbiota and performance. Br Poult Sci 2016;57:788-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/000716 68.2016.1219019
  35. Sylvester JT, Karnati SKR, Yu Z, Morrison M, Firkins JL. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. J Nutr 2004;134:3378-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.12.3378
  36. Wang R-F, Cao W-W, Cerniglia CE. PCR detection of Ruminococcus spp. in human and animal faecal samples. Mol Cell Probes 1997;11:259-65. https://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1997. 0111
  37. Stevenson DM, Weimer PJ. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007;75:165-74. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0802-y
  38. Paillard D, McKain N, Chaudhary LC, et al. Relation between phylogenetic position, lipid metabolism and butyrate production by different Butyrivibrio-like bacteria from the rumen. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2007;91:417-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-006-9121-7
  39. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Benno Y. Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:2766-74. http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.6.2766-2774.2001

Cited by

  1. Effects of seaweed extracts on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics, methane production, and microbial abundance vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03356-y
  2. Specific inhibition of Streptococcus bovis by endolysin LyJH307 supplementation shifts the rumen microbiota and metabolic pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism vol.12, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00614-x