Architectural research

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.75-84
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5575(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding Contextualised Liveability from the Bottom Up: A Qualitative Analysis of the Participatory Planning Proposals in Daegu, South Korea

  • Choi, Yo Sep (Department of Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seo, Bo Kyong (Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.10
  • 심사 : 2020.09.03
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper takes a qualitative approach to examining liveability by analysing the participatory planning proposals delivered by the local residents in Daegu, South Korea. Drawing on the textual resources of the proposals and interview data, the perceived liveability was found to vary across different neighbourhoods, and community cohesion and community capacity building were found highly valued in the liveability discourses in the Korean context. The paper argues that our understandings of liveability should be localised and contextualised at a sub-municipal level. It also highlights that participatory planning can be useful in articulating local communities' perception and experiences of liveability of their immediate localities, particularly in the less attractive and less affluent neighbourhoods in the city.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Balsas, C. (2004). Measuring the liveability of an urban center: an exploratory study of key performance indicators. Planning Practice & Research, 19, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745042000246603
  2. Bazeley, P. (2000). The NVivo qualitative project book. London & Thousand Oaks, California, Sage.
  3. Chaskin, R. (1997). Perspectives on neighbourhood and community: A review of the literature. Social Service Review, 71, 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1086/604277
  4. Clapham, D. (2012). Social constructionism and beyond in housing research. The SAGE handbook of housing studies, London, Sage, 174-187.
  5. Clavel, P. (1986). The progressive city: Planning and participation 1969-1984. New Brunswick, N.J. Rutgers University Press.
  6. Daegu Creative Urban Regeneration Center (DCURC). (2016). 2016 community participatory planning school report. Daegu, Daegu Creative Urban Regeneration Center.
  7. Daegu Metropolitan Government. (2016). 2025 strategic plan for urban regeneration in daegu metropolitan city. Daegu, Daegu Metropolitan Government.
  8. de Chazal, J. (2010). A systems approach to liveability and sustainability: Defining terms and mapping relationships to link desires with ecological opportunities and constraints. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 27, 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1058
  9. Douglass, M. (2016). The rise of progressive cities in Asia: Toward human flourishing in Asia's urban transition. Asia Research Institute Working Paper Series, No. 248. Singapore, National University of Singapore.
  10. Fainstein, S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05279275
  11. Friedmann, J. (2000). The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 460-472 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00258
  12. Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. London, Profile Books.
  13. Hankins, K. B. & Powers, E. M. (2009). The disappearance of the state from “liveable” urban spaces. Antipode, 41, 845-866 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00699.x
  14. Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 939-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x
  15. Hong, K., Choi, M., Park, B., Kim, J., Kwon, H., Kim, K., Park, M., Kwon, D., & Jeong, H. (2013). Urban revitalisation projects in Korea: The state and the future chellenges. Urban Information Service, 265, 3-26.
  16. Joo, Y., & Seo, B. (2018). Dual policy to fight urban shrinkage, Daegu, South Korea. Cities, 73, 128-137 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.015
  17. Kaal, H. (2011). A conceptual history of liveability: Dutch scientists, politicians, policy makers and citizens and the quest for a liveable city. City, 15, 532-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.595094
  18. Kashef, M. (2016). Urban liveability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003
  19. Keating, W., Krumholz, N., & Star, P. (1996). Revitalizing urban neighbourhoods. Lawrence, University Press of Kansas.
  20. Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, Calif. & London, Sage.
  21. Lefebvre, H., Kofman, E., & Lebas, E. (1996). Writings on cities. Cambridge, Mass, USA, Blackwell Publishers.
  22. Ley, D. (1990). Urban liveability in context. Urban Geography, 11, 31-35. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.11.1.31
  23. Lloyd, K., Fullagar, S., & Reid, S. (2016). Where is the 'social' in constructions of 'liveability'? exploring community, social interaction and social cohesion in changing urban environments. Urban Policy and Research, 34, 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2015.1118374
  24. Looker, B. (2012). Visions of autonomy: The new left and the neighbourhood government movement of the 1970s. Journal of Urban History, 38, 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144211428770
  25. McCrea, R., & Walters, P. (2012). Impacts of urban consolidation on urban liveability: Comparing and inner and outer suburb in Brisbane, Australia, Housing, Theory and Society, 29, 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2011.641261
  26. Mullins, P., & Western, J. (2001). Examining the links between housing and nine key socio cultural factors. Final report. Melbourne, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
  27. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2013). City life: Rankings (livability) versus perceptions (satisfaction). Social Indicators Research, 110, 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9939-x
  28. Pacione, M. (1990). Urban liveability: A review. Urban Geography, 11, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.11.1.1
  29. Pacione, M. (2003). Quality-of-life research in urban geography. Urban Geography, 24, 314-339. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.24.4.314
  30. Peterman, W. (2000). Neighbourhood planning and community-based development: The potential and limits of grassroots action. Thousand Oaks, California, United States, Sage.
  31. Rozek, J., Giles-Corti, B., & Gunn, L. (2018). The world's 'most liveability city' title isn't a measure of the things most of us actually care about. The Conversation. Retrieved February 26, 2019 from https://theconversation.com
  32. Ryan, R., & Selim, Y. (2018). Liveable Sydney: Liveable for whom? In R. W. Caves, & F. Wagner, Liveable cities from a global perspective, New York & Abingdon, Routledge, 111-126.
  33. Saitluanga, B. L. (2014). Spatial pattern of urban liveability in himalayan region: A case of Aizawl City, India, Social Indicators Research, 117, 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0362-3
  34. Teo, S. (2014). Political tool or quality experience? Urban liveability and the Singaporean state's global city aspirations, Urban Geography, 35, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.858510
  35. Vine, D. (2012). The neglected dimension of community liveability: Impact on social connectedness and active ageing in higher density accommodation. Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
  36. Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3. Retrieved May 31, 2019 from http://www.qualitative-research.net.
  37. Wetzstein, S. (2010). Exploring understanding of liveability for Perth: Towards better urban outcomes. FACTBase Bulletin, 17, Perth, The University of Western Australia and the Committee for Perth.
  38. Woolcock, G. (2009). Measuring up?: Assessing the liveability of Australian cities. Perth, Paper presented at the 4th State of Australian Cities (SOAC) National Conference.