대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제36권11호
  • /
  • Pages.117-128
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

표절 의혹 사례에 대한 건축차용 비평모형 구축

Construction of the Criticism Model on Architectural Appropriation for the Accused Cases of Plagiarism

  • 김영선 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과) ;
  • 최재필 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.31
  • 심사 : 2020.11.10
  • 발행 : 2020.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In different types of arts, appropriation is understood as a creative method. The pure creations are rare and most of the creations are the appropriations in art. The study constructed a criticism model on architectural appropriation based on the aesthetics of appropriation. Previously the criticism flow chart of architectural appropriation was suggested for just the cases which the architects mentioned about borrowing ideas or inspiring projects. This study forced on the accused cases of plagiarism which the architects never mentioned about the idea of appropriation. Therefore the study suggested 3 different criticism approaches; excluding the commodified architectures, tectonic approach, and aesthetic approach. In addition to that, the structure of art criticism was applied in the new model which is the description, interpretation, and evaluation to explain the specific stage of each criticism. As a result, the study reconstructed criticism model on the architectural appropriation for the accused cases of plagiarism which the architects did not have mentioned on appropriation. The next study will use the new criticism model on the real cases on architectural plagiarism. Therefore the view of creation in architecture may change to accept the idea of aesthetics of appropriation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, S. (1984). A Study on the need for a history of architectural criticism: Concentrating on the problem of the objectivity in architectural criticism, Master Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  2. Attoe, W. (1997). Architecture and Critical Imagination. (Lee, D., & Lee, J., Trans.). 2nd ed., Seoul: Dooyoung, 19. (Original work was published 1978).
  3. Foster, H.(Eds). (1993). The Object of Post-Criticism. Ulmer, G. (Au), The Anti-Aesthetics: Essays on Postmodern Culture (pp.155), (Yoon, B., Trans.). Seoul: Hyundai-meehak Publishing. (Original work published 1983)
  4. Han, S. (2007). Art and Creative Imitation, Essence and Phenomenon, 10.
  5. Jeon, W. (2011). A Study on Construction Background and Architectural Characteristics of Seoul Jongno-gu Gwancheol-dong Samilro Building: Focused on the Social Meaning and Roles of Architectures, Master Dissertation, Hanyang University.
  6. Jeong, I. (2002). House should be singing. Seoul: Haneul-Area, 72-73,76.
  7. Kang, M. (2007). Research on Architectural Variety and Criticism on Korean Architecture: Focusing on the Criticism of Architecture Journal in 1999-2006, Master Dissertation, Jeonbuk National University.
  8. Kim, H. (2018). "Beyond the mistification," Kim Chung-up Dialogue, 304-319, Paju: Youlhwadang.
  9. Kim, K. (1980). A Basic Study of Architectural Criticism: Its Methodology and an Application to Korean Architecture since 1969, Master Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  10. Kim, Y., & Choi, J. (2020a). Addressing the issues on Architectural Plagiarism through the Analysis of Discourses, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 35(12), 3-12.
  11. Kim, Y., & Choi, J. (2020b). The Applicability of Aesthetics of Appropriation for the Discussion on Architectural Plagiarism, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 36(5), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2020.36.5.11
  12. Nam, H. (2016). Law and the Arts. Journal of Korea Information law, 20(2), 31-68.
  13. Park, H. (2003). Teaching Techniques of Appreciation of Art & Art Criticism, Seoul: Sigongsa, 57.
  14. Park, S. (2017). A Study on the Type of Criticism Contents of Korean Architecture Magazine in 1980s: In case of Space, Ggumim, Architecture & Entironment, Mater Dissertation, Hanyang University.
  15. Park, Y. (1995). Criticism of Art and Criticism of Architecture, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 39(4), 16-18.
  16. Posner, R. (2007). The Little Book about Plagiarism. 1st ed., New York, Pantheon Books, 65, 105.
  17. Yim, S. (1995). The Problems in Korean Contemporary Architecture During the Period of Adapting Westernized-Modernization, Journal of Architectural History, 4(2), 135-139.
  18. Yoon, Y. (2013). A Study on Deformation using Appropriating and Composition Images: Focus on Photography and Painting, Doctoral Dissertation, Konkuk University.